Literature DB >> 29989988

Statistical Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Molecular Modeling.

Muhibur Rasheed, Nathan Clement, Abhishek Bhowmick, Chandrajit L Bajaj.   

Abstract

As computational modeling, simulation, and predictions are becoming integral parts of biomedical pipelines, it behooves us to emphasize the reliability of the computational protocol. For any reported quantity of interest (QOI), one must also compute and report a measure of the uncertainty or error associated with the QOI. This is especially important in molecular modeling, since in most practical applications the inputs to the computational protocol are often noisy, incomplete, or low-resolution. Unfortunately, currently available modeling tools do not account for uncertainties and their effect on the final QOIs with sufficient rigor. We have developed a statistical framework that expresses the uncertainty of the QOI as the probability that the reported value deviates from the true value by more than some user-defined threshold. First, we provide a theoretical approach where this probability can be bounded using Azuma-Hoeffding like inequalities. Second, we approximate this probability empirically by sampling the space of uncertainties of the input and provide applications of our framework to bound uncertainties of several QOIs commonly used in molecular modeling. Finally, we also present several visualization techniques to effectively and quantitavely visualize the uncertainties: in the input, final QOIs, and also intermediate states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29989988      PMCID: PMC6857703          DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2017.2771240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform        ISSN: 1545-5963            Impact factor:   3.710


  24 in total

Review 1.  Remarks about protein structure precision.

Authors:  D W Cruickshank
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  1999-03

2.  Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations.

Authors:  G N RAMACHANDRAN; C RAMAKRISHNAN; V SASISEKHARAN
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations.

Authors:  Todd J Dolinsky; Jens E Nielsen; J Andrew McCammon; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis.

Authors:  Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Gregory S Couch; Daniel M Greenblatt; Elaine C Meng; Thomas E Ferrin
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 5.  Recent advances in the development and application of implicit solvent models in biomolecule simulations.

Authors:  Michael Feig; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0.

Authors:  Howook Hwang; Thom Vreven; Joël Janin; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-15

7.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs.

Authors:  David A Case; Thomas E Cheatham; Tom Darden; Holger Gohlke; Ray Luo; Kenneth M Merz; Alexey Onufriev; Carlos Simmerling; Bing Wang; Robert J Woods
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  BDB: databank of PDB files with consistent B-factors.

Authors:  Wouter G Touw; Gert Vriend
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.650

9.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding.

Authors:  D Eisenberg; A D McLachlan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Jan 16-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  X-ray refinement significantly underestimates the level of microscopic heterogeneity in biomolecular crystals.

Authors:  Antonija Kuzmanic; Navraj S Pannu; Bojan Zagrovic
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.