Literature DB >> 29989092

CCL2-SQSTM1 positive feedback loop suppresses autophagy to promote chemoresistance in gastric cancer.

Wenxia Xu1, Qi Wei1, Mengjiao Han2, Bingluo Zhou2, Hanying Wang2, Jianbing Zhang3, Qiang Wang4, Jie Sun1, Lifeng Feng1, Shouyu Wang4, Yang Ye5, Xian Wang2, Jianwei Zhou4, Hongchuan Jin1.   

Abstract

Chemotherapy is one of the most important approaches for the treatment of various cancers. However, tumor cells often develop resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. The tumor microenvironment reconstituted by various cytokines secreted from immune cells was recently found to play important roles in affecting therapeutic response of tumor cells. Herein, we reported that tumor cells can secrete autocrine cytokines to confer chemoresistance by inactivating proapoptotic autophagy. Through cytokine screening, we found that drug resistant cancer cells secreted more CCL2 than drug sensitive cells. Such secreted CCL2 could not only maintain chemoresistance in drug-resistant cancer cells but also confer drug resistance to drug-sensitive cancer cells. CCL2 attenuated drug-induced cytotoxicity by activating PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling to inhibit proapoptotic autophagy and increase SQSTM1 expression. CCL2 expression in primary carcinoma tissues also correlated well with SQSTM1 expression. Either CCL2 knock-down or autophagy induction successfully reversed drug resistance of tumor cells. Moreover, increased expression of SQSTM1 in turn activated CCL2 transcription via NF-κB signal pathway, representing a positive feedback loop to maintain drug resistance. Therefore, our results provided a new insight to understand drug resistance, and indicated the potential value of CCL2 as a biomarker and intervention target for chemotherapy resistance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCL2; apoptosis; autophagy; drug resistance; gastric cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29989092      PMCID: PMC6036739          DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.25349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Sci        ISSN: 1449-2288            Impact factor:   6.580


Introduction

Chemotherapy is one of the most important approaches for the treatment of many cancers. However, tumor cells often develop resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs, leading to the failure of chemotherapy 1. It has been well documented that tumor cells can resist various chemotherapeutic drugs. Drug resistance involves genetic and epigenetic changes to reprogram the expression of genes critical to drug response 2-3. Evidences have indicated that the tumor microenvironment influences therapeutic response and drug resistance in various tumor cells 4. In this regarding, the non-tumor host cells in the tumor microenvironment such as fibroblasts and immune cells secrete various cytokines to activate or inactivate distinct signaling pathways in tumor cells, resulting in the resistance of drug-induced cell death 5-6. On the other hand, tumor cells can also recruit and educate non-tumor host cells to construct a beneficial microenvironment in support of their growth and expansion 7-8. CCL2 (chemokine C-C motif ligand 2), also named MCP-1 (Monocyte Chemotactic Protein-1), is a well-known cytokine belonging to the CC chemokine family 9. CCL2 is usually secreted by macrophages in response to infectious pathogens 10. Interestingly, paracrine CCL2 can also be secreted by tumor-associated-macrophages (TAMs) in tumor microenvironment to activate PI3K/AKT pathway in the tumor cells 11. CCL2 expression was associated with the development of various tumors, such as lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and gastric cancer 12-15. Recently, some tumor cells such as ovarian cancer cells were found to secrete autocrine CCL2 to confer the resistance to paclitaxel or carboplatin based chemotherapy 16. Therefore, cytokines could affect drug sensitivity in both paracrine and autocrine manners. However, it is still unknown what the role of CCL2 plays in drug resistance of gastric cancer cells, nor the precise mechanism. Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved cellular degradation process in which damaged organelles and protein aggregates are sequestered in a double membrane vesicle followed by fusion with lysosomes for degradation 17. Many chemotherapeutic drugs show significant effects on autophagy, whereby modulating autophagy can influence the anticancer effects 18-20. Activation of autophagy can promote resistance to various treatments 21-24. Therefore, autophagy inhibition was proposed to potentially increase the clinical efficacy of chemotherapies and the anti-cancer effect of autophagy inhibitors in combination with various chemotherapeutic regiments have been extensively evaluated in multiple clinical trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov). Recently, we established two chemoresistant cancer cell lines BGC823/DDP cells and SGC7901/DDP 25-27. By using these cell models, we reported two XRCC1 related proteins JWA and TXNL1 that contributed to drug resistance. These studies demonstrated the important role of DNA repair and apoptosis in gastric cancer chemoresistance. Here, in an effort to clarify the relevance of tumor cell-produced autocrine cytokines to drug resistance, we performed a cytokine screening and found that drug resistant cancer cells secreted more CCL2. Moreover, CCL2 was found to maintain or transduce drug resistance by activating PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway to suppress autophagy, leading to the increased expression of SQSTM1. In this regard, autophagy should be activated rather than inhibited to overcome chemoresistance. Moreover, increased expression of SQSTM1 activated CCL2 transcription via NF-κB signal pathway, demonstrating the CCL2-SQSTM1 positive feedback loop in chemoresistance. Therefore, CCL2 could be a potential biomarker and intervention target for chemotherapy resistance.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and Cell lines

Rapamycin and LY294002 were bought from Sigma-Aldrich (Louis, MO, USA) and CCL2 recombinant protein was provided by Sino Biological Inc (Beijing, China). BAY11-7082 were bought from Selleck Chemicals (Shanghai, China). Human gastric cancer cell lines BGC823 and SGC7901 were purchased from the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml of penicillin, and 100 μg/ml of streptomycin (Life Technologies/Gibco). Grand Island, NY, USA). The cells were grown at 37℃ in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Cisplatin was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The cisplatin-resistant cells were developed from the parental cells subjected to persistent gradient exposure to cisplatin for about 12 month, through increasing cisplatin concentration from 0.05 μg/ml until the cells acquired resistance to 1 μg/ml.

Co-culture experiments

Co-culture of BGC823 and BGC823/DDP, SGC7901 and SGC7901/DDP were performed with Corning Transwell polyester membrane cell culture system including 24 mm Transwell with 0.4 μm pore polyester membrane insert.

Cytokine screening and validation

1×106 BGC823, BGC823/DDP, SGC7901 and SGC7901/DDP cells were plated in 6-cm dish. After 24 h incubation, the mediums were replaced with serum free 1640 medium for 24 h. The conditional mediums were then collected to screen cytokines with cytokine antibody array according to protocols provided (RayBio® Human Cytokine Antibody Array G Series 1000). For the validation, the cytokines in the conditional medium were determined by ELISA according to the manufacturer's instructions (Boster, Wuhan, China).

siRNA and transfection

Small interfering RNA (siRNA) specific for CCL2 (1# 5'-CUCGCGAGCUAUAGAAGAATT-3', 2# 5'-CUCGCGAGCUAUAGAAGAATT-3'), SQSTM1 (1# 5'-GUGACGAGGAAUUGACAAUTT-3', 2# 5'-GGAGUCGGAUAACUGUUCATT-3') and control siRNA was synthesized in GenePharma (Shanghai, China). The siRNA was transfected into cells with Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Reagent (Life Technologies, CA, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions. In brief, cells were seeded overnight in 6-well plates (3-5×105/well). (a) Dilute 9μl Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Reagent in 150μl Opti-MEM Medium. (b) Dilute 30pmol siRNA in 150μl Opti-MEM Medium. Add (a) to (b) for 5min. Then Add siRNA-lipid complex to cells. Incubate cells for 1-3 days at 37°C. Then, analyze transfected cells.

Cytotoxicity assay

One day before treatment, BGC823, SGC7901, BGC823/DDP, SGC7901/DDP cells were plated at a density of 5000 cells per well in 96-well plates. The cells were treated with various concentrations of drugs. After 24 h treatment, the cell viability was determined using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan). The cell survival rates were expressed as mean±S.D. from at least three independent experiments.

TUNEL assay

Apoptosis was determined using the TUNEL apoptotic cell detection kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The percentages of apoptotic cells were counted from at least 1000 cells. The confocal images of cells were sequentially acquired with Zeiss AIM software on a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope system (Carl Zeiss Jena, Oberkochen, Germany) and images were processed with ZEN LE software (Carl Zeiss).

Tandem mRFP-GFP fluorescence microscopy

A tandem monomeric RFP-GFP-tagged LC3 (tfLC3) was used to monitor autophagy flux as previous reported. For evaluating tandem fluorescent LC3 puncta, 48 h after tfLC3 transfected alone, or with siRNAs/plasmid cotransfected, cells were washed with 1 × PBS, and then sent out for confocal microscope analysis directly. Samples were examined under a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope system (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and images were processed with ZEN LE software (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany)

Western blotting

Western blot analyses were performed as previously described 28. In brief, cells were lysed in whole-cell lysate buffer containing 1% phosphatase inhibitor cocktail and NPC tumor tissues were lysed in RIPA buffer (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) with 1% phosphatase inhibitor cocktail. Lysates containing 20-30 µg protein were loaded onto 8% or 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels for electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and the separated proteins transferred to poly vinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Pall, NY, USA). After blocking with 5% fat free milk for 1 h in Tris-buffered saline (TBS), the membranes were incubated with the primary antibody overnight at 4°C and then with the peroxidase labelled secondary antibody (agilent, CA, USA) for 1 h on the next day. WB bands were visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (EMD Millipore, MA, USA). The primary antibodies used were γH2AX (1:2000 dilution, Epitomics, Burlingame, CA, USA) and monoclonal anti-cleaved PARP-1, β-actin, p-AKT, p-mTOR, SQSTM1/p62, LC-3, P-P65 (1:2000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA).

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR

RT-PCR analyses were performed as previously described 29. In brief, Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNAs were quantified using a NanoDrop 2000c instrument (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA). Reverse transcription reaction was performed using 1μg of total RNA with Quantscript RT kit (Tiagen Biotechnology, Beijing, China). The mRNA expression level was determined by quantitative real-time PCR using SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystens, CA, USA) and ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). Human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal control of RNA integrity. The Primers (CCL2-F 5'-CAGCAGCAAGTGTCCCAAAG-3', CCL2-R 5'-TCCAGGTGGTCCATGGAATC-3'), (SQSTM1-F 5'-AGAACGTTGGGGAGAGTGTG, SQSTM1-R 5'-GCGATCTTCCTCATCTGCTC-3'), (GAPDH-F 5'-GGAGTCAACGGATTTGGT-3', GAPDH-R 5'-GTGATGGGATTTCCATTGAT-3').

Immunohistochemistry

All tissue samples were obtained from the tissue bank of Sir Runrun Shaw Hospital. This study was approved by the hospital ethics committee. Both anti-CCL2 (1:300 dilution) and anti-SQSTM1 (1:400 dilution) antibodies were optimized for immunohistochemistry. Subsequently, an identical formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded human gastric cancer tissue array was immunostained using microwave antigen retrieval in 0.01 M citrate buffer, pH 6.0. After washing, signal was detected using a suitable HRP-labeled second antibody with DAB as the chromagen. The staining results were judged by 2 independent pathologists in the department of pathology of our hospital. The positive staining was defined as uniform staining of more than 5% of 1000 tumor cells and the staining of less than 5% of 1000 tumor cells was defined as negative. Slides were assessed using Chi-Square analysis to determine the correlation of CCL2 and SQSTM1 expression.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. The statistical significance of the differences between the cell lines was determined by the parametric unpaired Student's t test. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.

Results

Identification of CCL2 as a critical autocrine cytokine to transmit drug resistance

Recently, we have established two cisplatin-resistant GC cell lines BGC823/DDP cells and SGC7901/DDP. These cells can keep vigorous growth in the medium containing various chemotherapeutic drugs such as cisplatin or arsenic trioxide.26-27 Here, we confirmed the drug resistance character of BGC823/DDP and SGC7901/DDP cells. Compared with BGC823/DDP and SGC7901/DDP cells, their parental sensitive cells BGC823 and SGC7901 were significantly killed in the presence of 1.0 μg/ml cisplatin (Figure ). In order to identify autocrine cytokines relevant to drug resistance in gastric cancer cells, we constructed an in vitro model to co-culture drug resistant cells with sensitive cells. In this co-culture transwell system, drug resistant BGC823/DDP or SGC7901/DDP cells were cultured in the top insert and the drug sensitive parental cells were cultured in the bottom well (Figure ), allowing the incorporation of cytokines potentially produced from drug resistant cells into the culture medium for drug sensitive cells. PARP1 plays a role in various pathological processes such as DNA damage repair and cell death. When PARP1 is cleaved by caspase-3, a truncated fragment of 89 KD is produced and mediates apoptosis 30. As a result, the cleaved form of PARP1 (C-PARP1) was significantly elevated in cisplatin-treated BGC823 and SGC7901 cells co-cultured with drug sensitive cells (Figure ). However, such ciaplatin-induced cleavage of PARP1 was significantly impaired after the co-culture of drug resistant cells (Figure ). In line with this result, the TUNEL assay also showed that cisplatin-induced apoptosis was significantly decreased in BGC823 cells and SGC7901 cells co-cultured with drug-resistant BGC823/DDP and SGC7901/DDP cells, respectively (Supplementary Figure ). These data demonstrated that drug resistant cancer cells could transmit the resistance to drug sensitive cells, most likely by secreting autocrine cytokines. To identify which cytokines were responsible for the transmission of drug resistance, we employed a cytokine antibody array to screen potential cytokines in the conditional medium of drug-resistant cells (Supplementary Figure ). As a result, CCL2 was 5.6 fold up-regulated in the conditional medium of SGC7901/DDP cells when compared with its level in the conditional medium of SGC7901 cells (Supplementary Figure ). Similarly, CCL2 was also increased in the culture medium of another drug-resistant cell line, BGC823/DDP (Supplementary Figure ). As confirmed by ELISA assay, CCL2 secretion was indeed significantly increased in BGC823/DDP and SGC7901/DDP cells compared with parental BGC823 and SGC7901 cells, respectively (Figure ). Importantly, when CCL2 secretion was effectively inhibited by siRNA-mediated gene knock-down (Supplementary Figure ), drug resistant cells partly lost their ability to transmit drug resistance to sensitive cells (Figure ). These findings indicated that autocrine CCL2 might be responsible for the transmission of drug resistance from resistant cancer cells to sensitive cancer cells.

Relevance of CCL2 to acquired drug resistance

Next, we wonder whether CCL2 is relevant to maintain drug resistance in drug-resistant cells. Indeed, cisplatin-induced PARP1 cleavage in BGC823/DDP and SGC7901/DDP cells was significantly elevated after CCL2 knockdown by transfection of CCL2 siRNA (Figure ). Consistently, knockdown of CCL2 in BGC823/DDP and SGC7901/DDP cells resulted in increased cell death induced by cisplatin (Figure ). The TUNEL assay further confirmed that the apoptosis of BGC823/DDP and SGC7901/DDP cells were significantly increased upon CCL2 knockdown (Supplementary Figure ). To validate the importance of CCL2 to acquired drug resistance in drug sensitive cells, we compared the effect of cisplatin on drug-sensitive BGC823 and SGC7901 cells with or without the addition of recombinant CCL2 protein. Interestingly, cisplatin-induced PARP1 cleavage was significantly decreased with the addition of recombinant CCL2 protein (Figure ). In support of this, the addition of recombinant CCL2 protein significantly attenuated cisplatin-induced viability inhibition of BGC823 and SGC7901 cells (Figure ). The TUNEL assay further confirmed that the apoptosis of BGC823 and SGC7901 cells were attenuated significantly in the presence of recombinant CCL2 protein. (Supplementary Figure ) Therefore, exogenous CCL2 protein could confer drug resistance to drug sensitive cells.

Activation of PI3K/AKT-mTOR signaling and inhibition of autophagy in CCL2-promoted drug resistance

Then, we explored how CCL2 suppressed cisplatin-induced apoptosis. Cisplatin was well-known to induce DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in the form of platinum-DNA adducts. The level of phosphorylated histone H2AX (γH2AX), a sensitive surrogate marker of DSBs, was increased in BGC823 and SGC7901 cells after cisplatin treatment (Supplementary Figure ). However, addition of recombinant CCL2 failed to reverse cisplatin-induced increase of γH2AX level in both cell lines (Supplementary Figure ), indicating that CCL2-transduced drug resistance was most likely due to the interference of downstream events in DNA damage response. It has been reported that CCL2 could activate intracellular signaling pathways such as PI3K/Akt signaling in myeloid-derived cells 11. Therefore, we explored the activity of PI3K/Akt-mTOR signaling in response to changes in CCL2 expression. As a result, we found that the phosphorylation of Akt (P-AKT) and mTOR (P-mTOR) was increased in drug resistant cells when compared with drug sensitive cells (Figure ). In contrast, the P-Akt level was significantly decreased if cells were transfected with CCL2 siRNA (Figure ). Moreover, the P-AKT level was significantly elevated after the treatment of CCL2 (Figure ). LY294002, the PI3K/Akt pathway inhibitor, blocked CCL2-induced phosphorylation of Akt and restored cisplatin-activated cleavage of PARP1 even in the presence of CCL2 (Figure ). PI3K/AKT-mTOR signaling pathway regulates numerous physiologic and pathologic processes 31. Among them, autophagy was recently found to be related with apoptosis and drug resistance 32-33. Indeed, the level of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain-3 II (LC-3 II) was reduced in drug resistant cells when compared with drug sensitive cells (Figure ). Meanwhile, the level of SQSTM1, one of the specific substrates that are degraded by autophagy, was increased in drug resistant cells (Figure ). In addition, after the activation of autophagy by starvation, the elevation of LC-3 II and degradation of SQSTM1 were significantly reduced in drug resistant cells (Figure ). We further introduced the mRFP-GFP-LC3 reporter to determine the autophagy flux. When located in autolysosomes, this form of LC3 displays only red fluorescence since the GFP signal is sensitive to the acidic condition in the lysosome lumen, whereas the RFP signal is more stable. Increased red spots appeared in the merged section of EBSS-treated BGC823 and SGC7901 cells, indicating the maturation of autolysosome in these cells. In contrast, less red spots were observed in drug resistant cells (Figure ). These results suggested that autophagy induction was significantly suppressed in drug resistant cells compared with drug sensitive cells. To further investigate the role of autophagy in drug resistance, we compared the drug response of drug resistant cells before and after activation of autophagy. When autophagy was activated by EBSS incubation (data was not shown) or rapamycin treatment (Figure ), more viability inhibition was observed in drug resistant cells (Figure ). Consistently, in drug resistant cells with autophagy activation, more cleavage of PARP1 was induced by cisplatin (Figure ). Therefore, autophagy was indeed suppressed in drug resistant cells and activation of autophagy could restore drug sensitivity. Based on above findings, we assumed that autocrine CCL2 promotes drug resistance by PI3K/Akt-mTOR activation and subsequent autophagy inhibition. Indeed, there was much more starvation-induced increase of LC-3 II and SQSTM1 degradation in CCL2-depleted resistant cells (Figure ). Moreover, after CCL2 depletion, increased red spots appeared in starved or cisplatin treated resistant cells with GFP-RFP-LC3 expression (Figure ), indicating that autocrine CCL2 was important to inhibit autophagy.

SQSTM1 promotes CCL2 transcription and secretion

Next, we explored the mechanism of CCL2 overexpression in drug resistant cells. We found that the mRNA level of CCL2 was much higher in drug resistant cells (Figure ), indicating that CCL2 gene transcription was enhanced. It has been reported that c-Jun controls histone modifications, NF-κB recruitment, and RNA Polymerase II function to activate the transcription of CCL2 gene 34. We found MAPK signal pathways were actually inhibited in drug resistant cells (Supplementary Figure ). However, P-P65 level was elevated, indicating the activation of NF-κB signal pathway in drug resistant cells (Figure ). Moreover, both the mRNA level and secretion of CCL2 were significantly decreased by treatment with NF-κB inhibitor BAY-11-7082 (Figure ). Since SQSTM1, which is important for the activation NF-κB signal pathway 35-36, was specifically upregulated in drug resistant cancer cells, we investigated whether SQSTM1 regulated the expression of CCL2. As a result, P-P65 was decreased by knockdown expression of SQSTM1 (Figure ). Similarly with NF-КB inhibition, both the mRNA level and secretion of CCL2 were significantly decreased after SQSTM1 knockdown (Figure ). These results indicated that SQSTM1 promoted CCL2 transcription and secretion, forming a positive feedback between CCL2 and SQSTM1. As BGC823 and SGC7901 cells derived from stomach adenocarcinoma, a total of 43 gastric adenocarcinoma tissues were employed to analyze the relationship of CCL2 expression and SQSTM1 in vivo. SQSTM1 positivity was statistically more frequent in CCL2 positive tissues compared with CCL2 negative tissues (Fisher's exact test, P= 0.018) (Figure ), indicating that CCL2 indeed inhibited autophagy in vivo.

Clinical relevance of CCL2 in gastric cancer

We next explored the clinical relevance of CCL2 and SQSTM1 mRNA level in gastric cancer patients by Kaplan-Meier plotter (http://kmplot.com/analysis/). We analyzed the GSE62254 dataset, which includes nearly 300 patients 37. High expression of SQSTM1 and CCL2 mRNAs were significantly associated with shorter overall survival (Figure ). High expression of SQSTM1 and CCL2 mRNAs were also significantly associated with shorter relapse free survival (Figure ). We also found the CCL2 level was much higher in serum of gastric cancer patients than health people (Figure ). CCL2 level was significantly decreased after surgery in patients with high level of CCL2 (>249.5pg/ml, Supplementary Figure . Then we used the conditional medium containg serum of patients with high serum level of CCL2 to culture gastric cancer cells. As a result, patient-derived CCL2 conferred drug resistance to gastric cancer cells which was impaired in the presence of CCL2 neutralizing antibody (Figure ). These results indicated the potential value of CCL2 as a biomarker and intervention target for chemotherapy resistance.

Discussion

Despite many advances that have been achieved, drug resistance is still the major obstacle for cancer treatment. Tumor cells acquired chemoresistance by various mechanisms including increased drug efflux, altered drug metabolism, enhanced capability of DNA repair, and activation of prosurvival signaling pathways 1. However, how the communication between heterogeneous tumor cells and tumor microenvironment contributed to drug resistance was still obscure. Tumor microenvironment created a complicated ecological niche for tumor growth and survival 38. Co-culturing melanoma cells with fibroblasts led to a diminished therapeutic response at least partly due to the production of fibronectin by fibroblasts 38. Interestingly, a subgroup of intrinsically resistant melanoma cells was capable of secreting fibronectin in response to a number of cellular stresses including BRAF inhibitor therapy and chemotherapy 39. In this study, we found that the drug resistant cancer cells secreted chemokine CCL2 to activate PI3K/AKT-mTOR pathway in response to chemotherapy. Moreover, co-culture with drug resistant cells led to a diminished therapeutic response in drug sensitive cells. Therefore, CCL2 may function as a key molecule to transmit drug resistance among heterogeneous tumor cells. CCL2 was usually secreted by host cells to promote tumor progression such as tumor metastasis by recruiting macrophages 40-42. In this study, we proved that CCL2 could be secreted by tumor cells and promote chemoresistance in an autocrine manner. Similarly, drug-resistant ovarian cancer cells can also secrete more CCL2 and blocking CCL2 increased sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs 16. Enhanced the expression and secretion of CCL2 also lead to neovascularization and increased resistance to chemotherapy in glioblastoma 43. Indeed, we succeeded in detecting increased level of CCL2 in cancer patients before surgical tumor removal. Blockage of CCL2 in conditional media by CCL2 neutralizing antibody restored the sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to cisplatin. Taken together, CCL2 could be a potential biomarker and intervention target for chemotherapy resistance. Moreover, CCL2 protein has been recognized as a potential independent adverse prognosticator to improve the predictive accuracy of overall survival in gastric cancer patients 44. Consistently, we found that higher CCL2 mRNA level related to shorter overall survival in gastric cancer patients by using Kaplan-Meier plotter. Whether targeting CCL2 could improve the clinical efficacy of conventional chemotherapy in vivo remains further investigations. Autophagy is an evolutionarily-ancient mechanism by which cellular materials is delivered to lysosomes for degradation 29, 45. In tumor cells, autophagy can be induced by various stresses such as nutrient starvation, hypoxia, chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The pro-survival role of autophagy in chemotherapy resistance has been widely reported, leading to the extensive investigation of autophagy inhibitors for anti-cancer treatments in clinical trials 46-48. However, autophagy acts as a double-edged sword in cancer development 49. Activation of autophagy has also been reported to enhance chemosensitivity 50. For example, autophagy can lead to the autophagic cell death which was also known as type 2 programmed cell death and difficult to differentiate from type 1 (apoptotic) cell death 51. In addition, the crosstalk between apoptosis and autophagy is complex. Autophagy and apoptosis can be simultaneously detected in response to their common stimuli 32. Our previous study reported that apoptosis was suppressed in drug resistant gastric cell lines 25. Here, we found autophagy was also suppressed in drug resistant cells and activation of autophagy by rapamycin reversed chemoresistance through the induction of apoptosis. Interestingly, autophagy occurred earlier than apoptosis, indicating that activation of autophagy triggered apoptosis. Therefore, CCL2 promoted chemoresistance by inhibiting autophagy and autophagy inducer rather than inhibitor should be employed to overcome chemoresistance. SQSTM1, a member of the autophagic receptors that promote autophagy activation, was degraded together with its cargo like misfolded proteins in autolysosomes 52-53. Here, due to the inhibition of autophagy by CCL2, SQSTM1 was up-regulated in drug resistant cells. SQSTM1 expression correlated well with CCL2 expression in primary stomach carcinoma tissues. In addition, higher SQSTM1 and CCL2 expression level were related to shorter overall survival and relapse free survival in gastric cancer patients. Interestingly, SQSTM1 also directly contributes to tumor development through the regulation of autophagy and oncogenic signaling pathways like NF-κB 54. NF-κB in turn can activate CCL2 transcription 55. These data revealed a positive feedback of CCL2 and SQSTM1 that contributed to drug resistance in gastric cancer. In conclusion, tumor cells can secrete autocrine CCL2 to maintain or transmit chemoresistance by activating PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling to inhibit proapoptotic autophagy (Figure ). CCL2 could be a potential biomarker and intervention target for chemotherapy resistance. In tumors with high level of CCL2 expression, autophagy inducers rather than inhibitors should be used to overcome chemoresistance. Supplementary figures and table. Click here for additional data file.
Table 1

CCL2 and SQSTM1 expression in gastric cancer tissues

SQSTM1weakstrong
CCL2weak75
strong625P=0.018
  55 in total

Review 1.  Death by design: apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy.

Authors:  Aimee L Edinger; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 8.382

2.  CCL2 and CCL5 Are Novel Therapeutic Targets for Estrogen-Dependent Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Susanne Svensson; Annelie Abrahamsson; Gabriela Vazquez Rodriguez; Anna-Karin Olsson; Lasse Jensen; Yihai Cao; Charlotta Dabrosin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  CCL2 expression correlates with Snail expression and affects the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jia Zhang; Yan Yan; Xiaohai Cui; Jing Zhang; Ya Yang; Huajing Li; Hongpei Wu; Junhai Li; Li Wang; Min Li; Xu Liu; Jiansheng Wang; Xiaoyi Duan
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 4.  On PAR with PARP: cellular stress signaling through poly(ADP-ribose) and PARP-1.

Authors:  Xin Luo; W Lee Kraus
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  YY1-MIR372-SQSTM1 regulatory axis in autophagy.

Authors:  Lifeng Feng; Yanning Ma; Jie Sun; Qi Shen; Leiming Liu; Haiqi Lu; Faliang Wang; Yongfang Yue; Jiaqiu Li; Shenjie Zhang; Xiaoying Lin; Jue Chu; Weidong Han; Xian Wang; Hongchuan Jin
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 16.016

6.  Heparanase Enhances Tumor Growth and Chemoresistance by Promoting Autophagy.

Authors:  Anna Shteingauz; Ilanit Boyango; Inna Naroditsky; Edward Hammond; Maayan Gruber; Ilana Doweck; Neta Ilan; Israel Vlodavsky
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  MiR-181a suppresses autophagy and sensitizes gastric cancer cells to cisplatin.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Yuqiang Nie; Hong Wang; Yong Lin
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.688

8.  Recruited mast cells in the tumor microenvironment enhance bladder cancer metastasis via modulation of ERβ/CCL2/CCR2 EMT/MMP9 signals.

Authors:  Qun Rao; Yuan Chen; Chiuan-Ren Yeh; Jie Ding; Lei Li; Chawnshang Chang; Shuyuan Yeh
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-02-16

9.  Blockade of autophagy reduces pancreatic cancer stem cell activity and potentiates the tumoricidal effect of gemcitabine.

Authors:  Ming-Chen Yang; Hao-Chen Wang; Ya-Chin Hou; Hui-Ling Tung; Tai-Jan Chiu; Yan-Shen Shan
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  Chloroquine enhances the efficacy of cisplatin by suppressing autophagy in human adrenocortical carcinoma treatment.

Authors:  Liang Qin; Tianyuan Xu; Leilei Xia; Xianjin Wang; Xiang Zhang; Xiaohua Zhang; Zhaowei Zhu; Shan Zhong; Chuandong Wang; Zhoujun Shen
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 4.162

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  The crucial role of LncRNA MIR210HG involved in the regulation of human cancer and other disease.

Authors:  Juan Lu; Danhua Zhu; Xiaoqian Zhang; Jie Wang; Hongcui Cao; Lanjuan Li
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 3.340

Review 2.  The Role of Lipid Metabolism in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Meng-Ying Cui; Xing Yi; Dan-Xia Zhu; Jun Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Impaired autophagic degradation of lncRNA ARHGAP5-AS1 promotes chemoresistance in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Liyuan Zhu; Yiran Zhu; Shuting Han; Miaoqin Chen; Ping Song; Dongjun Dai; Wenxia Xu; Tingting Jiang; Lifeng Feng; Vivian Y Shin; Xian Wang; Hongchuan Jin
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 8.469

4.  Bioinformatics analysis of a long non‑coding RNA and mRNA regulation network in rats with middle cerebral artery occlusion based on RNA sequencing.

Authors:  Xianchun Duan; Lan Han; Daiyin Peng; Can Peng; Ling Xiao; Qiuyu Bao; Huasheng Peng
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.952

Review 5.  Nef-induced CCL2 Expression Contributes to HIV/SIV Brain Invasion and Neuronal Dysfunction.

Authors:  Michael H Lehmann; Jonas M Lehmann; Volker Erfle
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Role of CC Chemokines Subfamily in the Platinum Drugs Resistance Promotion in Cancer.

Authors:  Maria E Reyes; Marjorie de La Fuente; Marcela Hermoso; Carmen G Ili; Priscilla Brebi
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 7.  The Role of Autophagy in Gastric Cancer Chemoresistance: Friend or Foe?

Authors:  Jing-Li Xu; Li Yuan; Yan-Cheng Tang; Zhi-Yuan Xu; Han-Dong Xu; Xiang-Dong Cheng; Jiang-Jiang Qin
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-12-03

8.  Lysyl oxidase and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α: biomarkers of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ya-Lin Han; Li Chen; Rui Qin; Guan-Qing Wang; Xiao-Hua Lin; Guang-Hai Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Effect of apigenin on whole transcriptome profile of TNFα-activated MDA-MB-468 triple negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  David Bauer; Elizabeth Mazzio; Aaron Hilliard; Ebenezer T Oriaku; Karam F A Soliman
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Identification of an Autophagy-Related Signature Predicting Overall Survival for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Gang Hu; Hong-Fang Feng; Hui Zhan
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.