| Literature DB >> 29989054 |
Sahar El Shedoudy1, Eman El-Doklah1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety of using the stiff end of a coronary wire to perforate an atretic pulmonary valve (PV) in patients with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (PAIVS).Entities:
Keywords: Coronary wire; Percutaneous balloon dilatation of pulmonary valve; Pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum; Pulmonary valve perforation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29989054 PMCID: PMC6035381 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsha.2018.01.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Saudi Heart Assoc ISSN: 1016-7315
Selection criteria prior to intervention.
| No. (%) | |
|---|---|
| Type of PA | |
| Membranous | 13 (100%) |
| RV | |
| Tripartite | 13 (100%) |
| PV annulus | |
| Mean ± SD | 10.0 ± 0.82 |
| Median (min–max) | 10.0 (9.0 to 11.0) |
| PV annulus | |
| Mean ± SD | 1.42 ± 0.18 |
| Median (min–max) | 1.59 (0.62 to 1.96) |
| Infundibulum | |
| Patent | 13 (100%) |
| Coronary sinusoids | 0 (0%) |
| TV annulus | |
| Mean ± SD | 10.2 ± 1.7 |
| Median (min–max) | 10 (8 to 13) |
| TV annulus | |
| Mean ± SD | –0.8 ± 0.9 |
| Median (min–max) | –1 (–2.2 to 0.6) |
| MV annulus | |
| Mean ± SD | 14 ± 1 |
| Median (min–max) | 14 (12 to 15) |
| MV annulus | |
| Mean ± SD | 1.4 ± 0.4 |
| Median (min–max) | 1.5 (0.5 to 1.9) |
| TV/MV annulus | |
| Mean ± SD | 0.73 ± 0.10 |
| Median (min–max) | 0.7 (0.6 to 0.9) |
MV = mitral valve; PA = pulmonary atresia; PV = pulmonary valve; SD = standard deviation; TV = tricuspid valve.
Fig. 1Pulmonary valve perforation procedure.
Data after intervention.
| Before intervention | After intervention | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | 77.1 ± 3.2 | 88.0 ± 6.51 | <0.001 |
| Median (min–max) | 77 (72–83) | 90 (77–95) | |
| Mean ± SD | 94.2 ± 4.5 | 41.9 ± 12 | <0.001 |
| Median (min–max) | 95 (85–100) | 35 (30–70) | |
RV = right ventricle; SD = standard deviation.
significant p value.
Fig. 2Change in mean RV pressure before and after Intervention.
Fig. 3Change in mean oxygen saturation before and after Intervention.
Fig. 4Outcome of the procedure. PDA = patent ductus arteriosus.
Change in tricuspid incompetence, tricuspid annulus size, and TV/MV annulus ratio during follow-up.
| Before | After | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TR | |||
| Mild | 3 (23.1%) | 7 (53.8%) | 0.014 |
| Moderate | 8 (61.5%) | 6 (46.2%) | |
| Severe | 2 (15.4%) | 0 (0%) | |
| TV annulus | |||
| Mean ± SD | 10.2 ± 1.7 | 17.5 ± 3.8 | <0.001 |
| Median (min–max) | 10 (8 to 13) | 18 (8.5 to 22) | |
| TV annulus | |||
| Mean ± SD | –0.8 ± 0.9 | 0.1 ± 0.9 | 0.003 |
| Median (min–max) | –1 (–2.2 to 0.6) | 0.4 (–1.9 to 1.3) | |
| MV annulus | |||
| Mean ± SD | 14 ± 1 | 20.2 ± 2.9 | <0.001 |
| Median (min–max) | 14 (12 to 15) | 21 (13 to 23) | |
| MV annulus | |||
| Mean ± SD | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.66 ± 0.22 | 0.015 |
| Median (min–max) | 1.5 (0.5 to 1.9) | 1.7 (1.1 to 1.9) | |
| TV/MV annulus | |||
| Mean ± SD | 0.73 ± 0.10 | 0.86 ± 0.11 | <0.001 |
MV = mitral valve; SD = standard deviation; TV = tricuspid valve; TR = tricuspid incompetence.
significant p value.
Fig. 5Change in tricuspid incompetence during follow-up.
Fig. 6Change in tricuspid annulus size during follow-up.
Fig. 7Change in tricuspid annulus Z score during follow-up. TV = tricuspid valve.
Fig. 8Change in TV/MV annulus ratio during follow-up.