| Literature DB >> 29988852 |
Takuma Sasaki1, Masaya Uesato2, Takumi Ohta1, Kentarou Murakami1, Akira Nakano1, Hisahiro Matsubara1.
Abstract
A 69-year-old man with advanced esophageal cancer and 2 early gastric cancers received chemoradiotherapy and was scheduled to undergo subtotal esophagectomy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, left lower esophageal perforation induced by vomiting suddenly occurred, and he urgently underwent esophago-proximal gastrectomy and gastrostomy without reconstruction. The resected specimen showed a complete response of pretreatment for the esophageal cancer and radical resection of one gastric cancer. Radical resection of the other gastric lesion was necessary before reconstruction. The fistula of gastrostoma was gradually dilated from 6.7 to 9.3 mm in order to pass the endoscope. At nine months after emergent operation, gastric ESD was performed via only the gastrostoma. A hemoclip with thread was attached to the specimen, and the thread was pulled out of the gastrostoma. The specimen was able to be removed en bloc, resulting in radical resection. Gastric tube reconstruction through the posterior sternal route was performed at six months after the ESD. He has not developed recurrence of the esophageal or gastric cancer in the two years since the emergent operation.Entities:
Keywords: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Gastric cancer; Gastrostoma; Gastrostomy
Year: 2018 PMID: 29988852 PMCID: PMC6033717 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i6.121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc
Figure 1Schematic illustration of esophagectomy. A: This schematic illustration shows the middle thoracic esophageal cancer (1T4b), two gastric cancers (2T1b,3T1a), esophageal perforation (4) and the cutting line of the emergent operation (dotted line); B: After the emergent operation, one gastric cancer (3) remained at the middle posterior wall with the gastrostoma at the anterior wall (arrow).
Figure 2Results of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. A: The remnant gastric lesion located at the middle posterior wall showed a mucosal cancer lesion about 10 mm in diameter; B: Just after the insertion of the scope into the stomach, Funada-type gastric wall fixation (arrow) (Create Medic, Tokyo, Japan) was performed at two opposite sites; C: A hemoclip (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with thread (arrow) was attached to the specimen, and the thread was pulled via the gastrostoma.
Figure 3Gross appearance of the resected gastric mucosa is shown. A superficial depressed tumor measuring 14 mm × 10 mm (white dot) was observed macroscopically.
Cases of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection performed in combination via routes other than the mouth
| Year | 1993 | 1997 | 2005 | 2008 | 2016 | 2018 |
| EMR/ESD | EMR | EMR | ESD | ESD | ESD | ESD |
| Subject | Human | Human | Human | Pig | Pig | Human |
| Number | 1 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 1 |
| Use of an oral endoscope | Traction | EMR | ESD | ESD | ESD | None |
| Use of a gastrostoma | EMR | Traction | Auxiliary endoscope | Traction | Traction | ESD and Traction |
| Diameter of the gastrostoma (mm) | 8 | 2.6 | 8 | 2.5 | 10, 16 | 9.3 |
| Period from PEG to EMR/ESD | 3 wk | Immediate | 3 wk | Immediate | Immediate | 7 wk |
| Gastropexy | Used | Used | None | None | None | Used |
This period was required to expand the fistula diameter from 6.7 to 9.3 mm. EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; PEG: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.