| Literature DB >> 29988840 |
Christina Lynggaard1, Ian David Woolsey1, Mohammad Nafi Solaiman Al-Sabi2, Nicolas Bertram3, Per Moestrup Jensen1.
Abstract
Vertebrates are hosts to numerous parasites, belonging to many different taxa. These parasites differ in transmission, being through either direct contact, a faecal-oral route, ingestion of particular food items, vertical or sexual transmission, or by a vector. Assessing the impact of diet on parasitism can be difficult because analysis of faecal and stomach content are uncertain and labourious; and as with molecular methods, do not provide diet information over a longer period of time. We here explored whether the analysis of stable isotopes in hair provides insight into the impact of diet and the presence of parasites in the rodent Myodes glareolus. Twenty-one animals were examined for parasites and their hair analysed for stable isotopes (C and N). A positive correlation between δ15N and one species of intestinal parasite was observed in females. Furthermore, several ectoparasites were negatively correlated with δ15N, indicating that infections are further associated with foraging habits (size and layout of the home range, length and timing of foraging, interaction with other rodents, etc.) that set the rodents in direct contact with infected hosts. Although a limited number of animals were included, it seemed that the isotope values allowed for identification of the association between diet and parasite occurrence in this rodent. We therefore propose that this method is useful in providing further insight into host biology, feeding preferences and potential exposure to parasites species, contributing to the understanding of the complex relationship between hosts and parasites.Entities:
Keywords: Bank vole; Diet; Hair; Isotope; Parasitism; δ13C; δ15N
Year: 2018 PMID: 29988840 PMCID: PMC6032500 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2018.04.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Fig. 1The relationship between δ13C and δ15N values for the 21 Myodes glareolus sampled from Kongelunden Denmark in September (S1) and October (S2). The rodents present great variation in isotope values.
Significant association between δ13C and δ15N values and body attributes (sex, liver weight, spleen weight, body weight and body length) and sampling round (S1 or S2) in 21 Myodes glareolus. Insignificant variables (p < 0.05) were step-wise removed.
| Parameter | Estimate | SE | Wald 95% Conf. Limits | Wald Chi-Sq | Pr > ChiSq | AIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δ15N | Intercept | 5.79 | 0.15 | 5.50 | 6.09 | 1462.89 | <.0001 | 24.8 |
| S1 vs S2 | −0.56 | 0.19 | −0.93 | −0.20 | 9.07 | 0.0026 | ||
| Females vs. Males | −0.58 | 0.19 | −0.96 | −0.21 | 9.30 | 0.0023 | ||
| δ13C | Intercept | −27.62 | 0.14 | −27.90 | −27.34 | 38040.70 | <.0001 | 23.1 |
| Females vs. Males | −0.57 | 0.18 | −0.92 | −0.22 | 9.99 | 0.0016 | ||
| Scale | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.40 | ||||
Parasite infracomunity structure of 21 Myodes glareolus collected in September and October.
| Parasites | Prevalence % (CI 95%) | Range of intensity | Mean intensity (CI 95%) | Mean abundance (CI 95%) | Infection site | Transmission route |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 (29–74) | 1–24 | 4.18 (1.91–11.2) | 2.19 (0.86–6.09) | Intestine | Faecal-Oral | |
| 28 (11–52) | 2–275 | 97.5 (16.3–213) | 27.9 (4.48–79) | Eye | Contact | |
| 33 (14–56) | 1–4 | 2 (1.29–2.86) | 0.67 (0.29–1.24) | Caecum | Faecal-Oral | |
| 19 (5–41) | 3–14 | 8 (4.25–12.2) | 1.52 (0.38–3.95) | Pancreatic ducts | I. H. | |
| 19 (2–35) | 1–3 | 1.75 (1–2.5) | 0.33 (0.05–0.76) | Intestine | I. H. | |
| 23 (8–47) | 1–7 | 3 (1–5) | 0.71 (1.43–1.9) | Liver (cysts) | Oral | |
| 57 (35–78) | 1–10 | 2.58 (1.58–4.83) | 1.48 (0.76–2.95) | Body surface | Contact | |
| 33 (13–53) | 1–3 | 1.86 (1.14–2.43) | 0.62 (0.24–1.1) | Body surface | Contact | |
| 4 (0–23) | 1 | 1 (n/a) | 0.05 (0–0.14) | Body surface | Contact | |
| 4 (0–23) | 1 | 1 (n/a) | 0.05 (0–0.14) | Body surface | Contact | |
| 47 (25–70) | 1–3 | 1.5 (1.1–1.9) | 0.71 (0.38–1.1) | Body surface | Contact | |
| 33 (13–53) | 1–14 | 3.43 (1.43–8.71) | 1.14 (0.33–3.76) | Body surface | Contact | |
| 61 (38–81) | 1–27 | 5.15 (2.85–11.7) | 3.19 (1.57–7.65) | Body surface | Contact | |
| 38 (18–61) | 1–72 | 16.6 (2.88–42.1) | 6.33 (1–18.7) | Body surface | Contact | |
| 42 (21–65) | 1–17 | 3.89 (1.89–9.11) | 1.67 (0.67–4.48) | Body surface | Contact | |
| 80 (58–94) | 1–768 | 121 (53.9–267) | 97.9 (42.8–216) | Body surface | Contact | |
| 95 (76–99) | 1–28 | 7.4 (5–11.3) | 7.05 (4.62–10.9) | Body surface | Contact | |
| 90 (69–98) | 1–29 | 11.2 (8.14–15.1) | 10.1 (6.95–13.9) | Body surface | Contact | |
| Cheyletidae | 4 (0–23) | 1 | 1 (n/a) | 0.05 (0–0.14) | Body surface | Contact |
| 4 (0–23) | 1 | 1 (n/a) | 0.05 (0–0.14) | Body surface | Contact | |
Note: I.H. refers to the ingestion of an intermediate host; contact refers to direct contact between rodents.
Output from Spearman's rank correlation test between parasite species with prevalence ≥10% in 21 Myodes glareolus.
| 1.00 | ||||||||||||
| −0.14 | ||||||||||||
| −0.15 | −0.03 | |||||||||||
| −0.1 | 0.3 | |||||||||||
| −0.03 | 0.17 | 0 | ||||||||||
| 0.42 | −0.37 | −0.15 | −0.12 | −0.34 | ||||||||
| −0.21 | −0.14 | 0.33 | −0.11 | −0.23 | ||||||||
| −0.2 | −0.05 | −0.13 | −0.16 | 0.15 | −0.07 | −0.15 | ||||||
| 0.15 | −0.04 | 0.04 | −0.33 | −0.25 | −0.13 | |||||||
| 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.04 | −0.19 | −0.02 | −0.17 | −0.26 | ||||||
| 0.02 | −0.08 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.29 | −0.12 | 0.19 | 0.16 | |||||
| −0.55 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.21 | −0.09 | −0.04 | |||||
| −0.31 | 0.25 | −0.33 | −0.15 | 0.23 | −0.31 | −0.13 | −0.01 | −0.41 | −0.06 | 0.09 | ||
Note: An asterisk indicates the significance level (p < 0.05) and two asterisks (p < 0.01).
Output from analysis of parasite abundance in 21 Myodes glareolus that included the independent effects of body attributes (sex, liver weight, spleen weight, body weight and body length), sampling round (S1 or S2) and hair δ13C and δ15N values. In all analyses, more than five individuals were infected with the given parasite. Insignificant variables (p < 0.05) were step-wise removed.
| Taxa (no of non-zero values) | Parameter | Estimate | SE | Wald 95% Conf. Limits | Wald Chi-Sq | Pr > ChiSq | AIC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | −24.81 | 4.42 | −33.47 | −16.15 | 31.50 | <.0001 | 57.8 | |
| (11) | S1 vs. S2 | 4.35 | 0.91 | 2.57 | 6.12 | 23.05 | <.0001 | |
| d15N | 4.06 | 0.65 | 2.78 | 5.33 | 38.85 | <.0001 | ||
| Female vs. males | 2.08 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 3.42 | 9.30 | 0.0023 | ||
| Intercept | −1.76 | 2.29 | −6.25 | 2.72 | 0.59 | 0.4410 | 864.6 | |
| (6) | Liver weight | 40.68 | 18.13 | 5.15 | 76.22 | 5.04 | 0.0248 | |
| Spleen weight | 57.18 | 23.66 | 10.81 | 103.56 | 5.84 | 0.0157 | ||
| Intercept | −5.25 | 1.74 | −8.66 | −1.85 | 9.17 | 0.0025 | 41.8 | |
| (7) | Body weight | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.31 | 9.84 | 0.0017 | |
| Intercept | −0.54 | 0.58 | −1.67 | 0.60 | 0.87 | 0.3516 | 75.3 | |
| (12) | S1 vs. S2 | 1.52 | 0.66 | 0.23 | 2.81 | 5.34 | 0.0208 | |
| Intercept | 9.15 | 4.34 | 0.65 | 17.66 | 4.45 | 0.0349 | 58.6 | |
| (7) | Spleen weight | −138.72 | 48.28 | −233.35 | −44.08 | 8.25 | 0.0041 | |
| Body weight | 0.53 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.80 | 15.49 | <.0001 | ||
| Body length | −2.19 | 0.72 | −3.60 | −0.78 | 9.30 | 0.0023 | ||
| Intercept | −2.77 | 1.85 | −6.39 | 0.85 | 2.25 | 0.1335 | 129 | |
| (13) | S1 vs. S2 | 2.02 | 0.90 | 0.25 | 3.79 | 4.98 | 0.0256 | |
| Liver weight | 38.16 | 18.03 | 2.83 | 73.50 | 4.48 | 0.0343 | ||
| Intercept | −103.05 | 32.89 | −167.52 | −38.58 | 9.82 | 0.0017 | 237.4 | |
| (8) | d13C | −3.70 | 1.15 | −5.95 | −1.45 | 10.39 | 0.0013 | |
| Intercept | 7.19 | 3.03 | 1.25 | 13.13 | 5.63 | 0.0177 | 56.8 | |
| (9) | d15N | −2.32 | 0.60 | −3.49 | −1.15 | 15.11 | 0.0001 | |
| Spleen weight | −39.43 | 16.63 | −72.02 | −6.84 | 5.62 | 0.0177 | ||
| Body weight | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.29 | 27.93 | <.0001 | ||
| Intercept | 14.76 | 3.75 | 7.42 | 22.11 | 15.52 | <.0001 | 1475.1 | |
| (17) | S1 vs. S2 | −5.34 | 1.26 | −7.81 | −2.88 | 18.03 | <.0001 | |
| d15N | −2.32 | 0.52 | −3.35 | −1.30 | 19.66 | <.0001 | ||
| Liver weight | −42.60 | 19.72 | −81.24 | −3.95 | 4.67 | 0.0308 | ||
| Body weight | 0.59 | 0.28 | 0.05 | 1.13 | 4.64 | 0.0312 | ||
| Intercept | −0.24 | 0.88 | −1.96 | 1.49 | 0.07 | 0.7890 | 164.8 | |
| (20) | Body weight | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 7.15 | 0.0075 | |
| Intercept | 2.58 | 0.19 | 2.22 | 2.95 | 194.56 | <.0001 | 194 | |
| (19) | S1 vs. S2 | −0.81 | 0.37 | −1.54 | −0.08 | 4.79 | 0.0286 | |
Note: No significant correlation was observed for Megabothris walker (7) or Ixodes ricinus (10).
Fig. 2The relationship between parasite intensity and δ15N values for the mite Listrophorus brevipes in September (S1) and October (S2) samples of Myodes glareolus. Note the log-scale for parasite abundance.
Fig. 3The average Pearsons Correlation Coefficient (error bars: SE) between abundance and δ13C and δ15N for the two parasite groups: ecto and endoparasite for females (left) and males (right). The data includes 13 parasites occurring on 5 or more individuals and indicate consistent correlations for endoparasites and δ15N, while this is not the case for δ13C.