| Literature DB >> 29988421 |
Laurien H Ulfman1, Jeanette H W Leusen2, Huub F J Savelkoul3,4, John O Warner5, R J Joost van Neerven1,3.
Abstract
This review aims to provide an in depth overview of the current knowledge of the effects of bovine immunoglobulins on the human immune system. The stability and functional effects of orally ingested bovine immunoglobulins in milk products are described and potential mechanisms of action are discussed. Orally ingested bovine IgG (bovine IgG) can be recovered from feces, ranging from very low levels up to 50% of the ingested IgG that has passed through the gastrointestinal tract. In infants the recovered levels are higher than in adults most likely due to differences in stomach and intestinal conditions such as pH. This indicates that bovine IgG can be functionally active throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Indeed, a large number of studies in infants and adults have shown that bovine IgG (or colostrum as a rich source thereof) can prevent gastrointestinal tract infections, upper respiratory tract infections, and LPS-induced inflammation. These studies vary considerably in target group, design, source of bovine IgG, dosage, and endpoints measured making it hard to draw general conclusions on effectiveness of bovine immunoglobulin rich preparations. Typical sources of bovine IgG used in human studies are serum-derived IgG, colostrum, colostrum-derived IgG, or milk-derived immunoglobulins. In addition, many studies have used IgG from vaccinated cows, but studies using IgG from nonimmunized animals have also been reported to be effective. Mechanistically, bovine IgG binds to many human pathogens and allergens, can neutralize experimental infection of human cells, and limits gastrointestinal inflammation. Furthermore, bovine IgG binds to human Fc receptors which, enhances phagocytosis, killing of bacteria and antigen presentation and bovine IgG supports gastrointestinal barrier function in in vitro models. These mechanisms are becoming more and more established and explain why bovine IgG can have immunological effects in vivo. The inclusion of oral bovine immunoglobulins in specialized dairy products and infant nutrition may therefore be a promising approach to support immune function in vulnerable groups such as infants, children, elderly and immunocompromised patients.Entities:
Keywords: allergy; bovine immunoglobulins; colostrum; immune; infection; milk
Year: 2018 PMID: 29988421 PMCID: PMC6024018 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Proposed effects of bovine IgG at various locations in the GI tract. (A) After ingestion bovine IgG can encounter swallowed respiratory pathogens and inhaled allergens. This can lead to partial immune exclusion (especially when milk is regurgitated and enters the nasopharynx) and immune modulation in the tonsils that comprise Waldeyer's ring. (B) In the small intestine IgG can also exclude pathogens by preventing adhesion to epithelial surfaces, but may also promote the uptake of immune complexes of IgG with pathogens via Fc receptors, resulting in regulatory immune responses and induction of IgA. (C) In the colon, IgG prevents leakage of LPS, can modify microbiota composition and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) production, and can prevent adhesion of pathogens.
Treatment of GIT infections in infants and children.
| 3 months−6 year Japanese children with rotavirus diarrhea (active | Hyper immune colostrum (titer 1:1280 – 1:5120) 20–50 mL/day, 3 days | Randomized | No significant differences between Rota colostrum recipients and controls. | ( |
| 6–24 months old Bangladeshian children with rotavirus diarrhea (active | Hyperimmune- vs. normal colostrum rota strains WA, RV5, RV3 and ST3. 100-fold titer difference 100 mL/day, 3 days | Randomized, double blind | Reduction of duration and severity of diarrhea in treatment group | ( |
| 4–24 months old Bangladeshian children with rotavirus diarrhea (active | Hyper immune colostrum 4 × 2.5 g/day, 4 days | Double blind | Decreased stool output and -frequency; increased, and faster clearance of rotavirus from the stool | ( |
| <2 year old German children with rotavirus diarrhea [acive | Bovine antibody concentrate. Low and high rotatiters (low: f1.100 high: = 1:6.000) 2 g/kg bw/day, 5 days | Open controlled | Low titers, no effect. High titers; trend for reduced duration diarrhea, sign. reduction viral shedding. | ( |
| 6–30 months old Finnish children with rotavirus diarrhea ( | Hyperimmune- vs. standard colostrum vs. milk SA rotavirus titers: 1:597 vs. 1:128 vs. 1:16 4 ×100 mL/day, 4 days | Randomized, double blind | Trend but no significant differences for weight gain, reduced duration and frequency of diarrhea in hyperimmune group compared to other 2 groups | ( |
| 10 day−18 months German children with ETEC diarrhea ( | Hyperimmune milk (0–7 days) 0.32 g/kg/day 1 g/kg, 10 days | Open | Negative stool culture in 84% of the patients | ( |
| 4–24 months Bangladeshian children with a history of acute watery diarrhea for ‘48 h (active | Hyperimmune- vs. non-immune milk Ig against EPEC and ETEC, 45, 40% respectively. 20 g/day, 4 days | Placebo controlled, randomized, double blind | No effect of hyperimmune milk on any of the outcomes. | ( |
| 4–29 months old | Hyperimmune Ig preparation vs. non-immune colostrum, 1 g/day, 30 days | Placebo controlled, double blind pilot | No effect was observed by hyperimmune product on H pylori infection as determined by UBT | ( |
| 1–12 year old Bangladeshian children with bloody mucoid diarrhea <5 days, Shigellosis (active | Hyperimmune vs. non-immune colostrumtiter 3,200–6,400 anti-shigella 3 × 100 mL, 3 days | Placebo controlled, randomized | No difference between hyper and non-immune colostrum group in any of the outcomes | ( |
| 1 months−18 year old German children with | Immunoglobulin concentrate (Lactobin) vs. placebo 80% protein, >65% Immunoglobulin 3 × 7 g, 14 days | Placebo controlled, double blind | Stool frequency was reduced in Ig Concentrate treated group. No effects on carriage pathogens and complications of infections. | ( |
Prevention of Gastrointestinal tract infections in infants.
| 3 months–6 year old Japanese infants (active | Hyperimmune colostrum 0.6 g IgG + 0.02–0.05 g IgA/day 20 mL | Randomized | Prevention of rota infection but no effect on duration of diarrhea, bowel movements or virus shedding in stool. | ( |
| 3–15 months old Australian infants (active | Hyperimmune colostrum 50 mL/ 1 day, 10days | Randomized, controlled | Effective; 9/ 65 control children and 0/55 treated children acquired rotavirus infection | ( |
| 1–36 months old infants from HongKong and India (actve | Hyperimmune colostrum 2 g/day. 3x a day hospital stay + 3days after | Randomized double blind | 0/23, 0/27 in treated and 5/50 and 8/52 in control group showed rota infection in India and HK resp. | ( |
| 3–7 months old American infants (actve | Hyperimmune colostrum (0.2 mg/ml in formula) >360 mL formula/day, max 6 months | Randomized, controlled | No. of days with diarrhea and rota associated diarrhea sign lower in treatment group. Incidence not sign lower. | ( |
| 3–6 months old Chilean children (active | Milk Ig concentrate, immunized cows 1 g/day 0.5% wt/wt rota + 0.5% wt/wt EPEC immune conc. 6 months | Double blind | No effect on incidence nor duration of diarrhea | ( |
| 3–6 months old Iraqi infants ( | Hyperimmune colostrum 0.5 g/kg bw | Randomized double blind | Lower incidence of diarrhea | ( |
| 1–6 year old Egyption children with recurrent URTI and/or diarrhea (GITI) ( | Bovine colostrum 3 g/day for <2 year 6gr/day for >2 years, 4 weeks | Open, non-comparative | Lower number of episodes and hospitalizations for GITI (and URTI) | ( |
| 1–8 year old Indian children with recurrent URTI and/or diarrhea ( | Bovine colostrum 3gr/day, 12 weeks | Open, non-comparative | Lower number of episodes and hospitalizations for GITI (and URTI) | ( |
prevention of GIT in HIV patients.
| Germany | Igs from bovine colostrum (Lactobin) 10 g/day, 10 days | Non-controlled pilot study | Mean daily stool frequency decreased from 7.4 to 2.2 at the end of the treatment | ( | |
| UK | Igs from bovine colostrum (Lactobin) 50 g/day, 14 days | Case report | Clinical improvement of diarrhea and elimination of parasite. | ( | |
| Germany | Igs from bovine colostrum 10 g/day, 10 days, 20 g/day 10 days in non-responders | Prospective, open, uncontrolled | Complete (40%) or partial (24%) remission of diarrhea in 64% of the patients | ( | |
| Nigeria | Bovine colostrum product (ColoPlus) 2 × 50 g/day, colostrum 32% containing 3–4 g IgG /50 g | Open label observational study | Reduced nr defecations/day. Increase haemaglobulin, albumin. Alleviated fatique, increased CD4+ cells. | ( | |
| America | Serum derived bovine Ig 2.5 g/day, 8 weeks | Open label | Improvement in symptoms with reduced bowel movements/day ( | ( | |
| Uganda | Colostrum based food | Field trial | Improved nutritional and immune status (increased body weight, decreased fatigue, transient rise in CD4 Tells) | ( | |
| Active | Uganda | Colostrum based supplement 2 × 50 g/day, 4 weeks | Randomized single-blind controlled trial | Daily stool frequency decraeased by 79% during study period in colostrum group compared to 58% in control group( | ( |
Prevention of URTI with bovine IgG and colostrum.
| 1–6 year old Egyptian children with recurrent URTI and/or diarrhea ( | open, non-comparative | Colostrum, 3 g/day for <2 year 6 g/day for >2 years, 4 weeks | Lower number of episodes and hospitalizations for URTI (and GITI) | ( |
| 1–8 y old Indian children with recurrent URTI/diarrhea ( | open, non-comparative | Colostrum 3 g/day, 12 weeks | Lower number of episodes and hospitalizations for URTI (and GITI) | ( |
| 5–17 year old Turkish IgA deficient infants with recurrent URTI (active | Placebo controlled, randomized, double blind | Colostrum 3 × suckling tablet (incl 14 mg colostrum+2.2 mg lysozyme) /d, 3 days | Lower infection severity score in treatment group, no effect on salivary IgA | ( |
| 3–9 year old healthy japanese children (active | Placebo controlled, randomized, double blind | Late colostrum (10% Igs)- vs. semi skimmed milk tablets 0.5 g/day. 9 weeks | Frequency and duration of URTI was lower in the treatment group vs. the control group, especially in the 3–6 year old children | ( |
| 3–7 year old Italian children with recurrent URTI (active | Retrospective observational study | Sinerga (incl. colostrum, incl probiotics) vs. bacterial extracts 1 sachet (a 3 g)/day, 10 days month 1, 20 days months 2,3,4 | Greater reduction in the frequency of respiratory infections that needed antibiotic therapy in the group of children supplemented with Sinerga than in the group treated with bacterial extracts. | ( |
| >18 years old australian adults with 3 or more URTI in the last 6 months (active | Placebo controlled, randomized, double blind | Bovine lactoferrin /whey protein Ig-rich fraction (Lf/IgF) vs. placebo 2 × 300 mg/day, 90 days | # Cold events over 90 days significant lower in treatment group compared to control group. Duration and severity of cold was not different between groups. | ( |
| 14–27 year old Trained swimmers and age matched controls (4 groups) from New Zealand (active | Placebo controlled, randomized, double blind | Low protein colostrum powder (3% Ig w/w) vs. isocaloric placebo 2 × 25 g/day, 10 weeks | A non-significant trend for lower upper respiratory symptoms in athletes consuming colostrum vs. placebo was reported. No effects in control group. No differences between groups wrt saliva and serum Igs. | ( |
| 18–50 year old adults in the UK (active | Placebo controlled, randomized, double blind | Colostrum vs. iso-energetic/-macronutrient placebo 2 × 25 g/day, 10 weeks | Significantly lower proportion of days with URI during the 12 weeks in the COL group (5%) compared to the PLA group (9%). No difference on | ( |
| 25–30 year old trained Australian cyclists | Placebo controlled, randomized, double blind | Colostrum protein concentrate (CPC, 20% Ig) vs. whey protein 10 g/day, 8 weeks | Trend toward reduced incidence of upper respiratory illness symptoms in the bovine CPC group ( | ( |
| 18–35 year old Australian healthy volunteers (active | Placebo controlled, randomized, double blind | Colostrum protein concentrate (CPC) vs. whey protein 3 × 20 g/day, 8 weeks | Incidence but not duration of URTI was significantly lower in CPC group compared to whey group. | ( |
| 50–60 year old Italian healthy volunteers ( | Randomized study | Vaccination ± colostrum product vs. colostrum only vs. no prophylaxis 1 tablet a 400 mg (25-40% Ig)/day, 8 weeks | Number of days with flu was 3 times higher in the non-colostrum compare to the colostrum treated group (colostrum+vacc 14 vs. vacc only 57 vs. colostrum only 13 episodes vs. non-treated 41) | ( |
| 60–70 year old Italian elderly people with high risk for influenza (heart/lung problems) ( | Randomized study | vaccination ± colostrum product vs. colostrum only vs. no prophylaxis 1 tablet a 400 mg (25–40% Ig)/day, 8 weeks | The incidence of complications and hospital admission was higher in the group that received only a vaccination compared with the colostrum groups. | ( |
Figure 2Immunological mechanisms of bovine immunoglobulins. Bovine immunoglobulins can modify innate as well as adaptive immunity. By binding directly to pathogens, bovine immunoglobulins can bind to FcγR bearing innate immune cells, leading to phagocytosis and killing. In some cases, as for RSV, bovine IgG may also fully neutralize human pathogens as demonstrated for RSV in vitro (38). Other mechanisms of pathogen elimination may be complement mediated pore formation and killing, and ADCC. On the other hand, as bovine IgG-pathogen immune complexes bind to FcγR, receptor mediated uptake and antigen processing is enhanced, resulting in increased T, and ultimately B-cell responses to the pathogens.