| Literature DB >> 29988218 |
Silvia Stefania Longoni1,2,3, Maria Elena Villagrán-Herrera4, Jose Antonio de Diego Cabrera5, Clotilde Marin1, Manuel Sanchez-Moreno1.
Abstract
Clinical diagnosis of leishmaniasis is highly complex, presenting a wide range of clinical manifestations, sometimes non-specific, and thus the epidemiological study and diagnostic need specific molecular markers for each Leishmania species. Leishmania spp. posses different Fe-SOD isoforms, one of which is excreted into the external milieu and, presenting immunogenic characteristics, is a very reliable molecular marker. Superoxide dismutases (SODs) are antioxidant metal-enzymes responsible for the dismutation of superoxide ion into hydrogen peroxide and molecular oxygen, and it is considered an important virulence factor. In this manuscript we have purified the iron(Fe)-SOD excreted by Leishmania braziliensis using ion-exchange and molecular-sieve chromatography and we have studied it as an antigen in serodiagnostic analyses in ELISA and Western blot techniques, testing 213 human sera from Mexico. Indeed, L. braziliensis Fe-SODe has been purified 123.26 times with a specific activity of about 893.66 U/mg of protein. Applying the purified enzymes in serological tests we found 17.84% sera positive. We have demonstrated that the purified enzyme is more sensitive than the non-purified ones and we also demonstrated, for the first time, the presence of antibodies against L. braziliensis, not the main species in the country, in human population from Hidalgo and Nuevo Leon States.Entities:
Keywords: ELISA; Human leishmaniasis; Iron superoxide dismutase; Leishmania braziliensis; Mexico
Year: 2016 PMID: 29988218 PMCID: PMC5991859 DOI: 10.1016/j.parepi.2016.04.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasite Epidemiol Control ISSN: 2405-6731
Fig. 1Purification profiles of SOD excreted from Leishmania braziliensis. (A) QAE A-50 ion exchange chromatography. (): protein concentration; (): SOD activity; (): gradient 0–0.6 M KCl. (B) Sephadex G-100 sieve chromatography. (): protein concentration; (): SOD activity. (C) Isoelectric focusing gel electrophoresis pI 3–9 of the fractions eluted by Sephadex G-100, the SOD activity was stained following the Beyer and Fridovich's (1987) protocol.
Leishmania braziliensis excreted superoxide dismutase purification summary.
| Fraction | Total protein (mg) | Total activity | Specific activity | Purification | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P85 | 34.71 | 663.31 ± 9.98 | 7.25 ± 4.41 | 1 | 100 |
| Peak Q1 | 1.106 | 631.59 ± 5.05 | 322.49 ± 7.89 | 44.48 | 95 |
| SODe-Lb | 0.442 | 395.00 ± 0.00 | 893.66 ± 0.00 | 123.26 | 60 |
“SD” is the standard deviation of the mean of four determinations.
SOD activity determined by the technique of Beyer and Fridovich, (1987).
Fig. 2Electophoresis profile of fraction p85 (Lines 1 and 3) and purified protein SODe-Lb (Lines 2 and 4). A: native gel electrophoresis in PhasGel homogeneous 12.5% stained following the manufacturer silver nitrate protocol. B: Isoelectro focusing (IEF) in polyacrylamide Phast Gel 3–9 stained following the Beyer and Frodovich SOD activity protocol (Beyer and Fridovich, 1987).
Fig. 3Immunoblot of the ELISA positive serum samples at a dilution of 1/200 against SODe-Lb. Lines 4–132 correspond to sera from Monterrey (Nuevo Leon State) and Lines 3p, 13p and 28p correspond to sera from Pachuca (Hidalgo State). Line M: SODe activity in isoelectric focusing and staining following the technique of Beyer and Fridovich (1987).
Relationship of positive sera from Monterrey (Nuevo Leon State) and Pachuca (Hidalgo State) to L. braziliensis by ELISA (ELISA) and Western blot (WB). Antigen fraction: iron superoxide dismutase excreted not purified (Np), and iron superoxide dismutase excreted purified (P).
| ELISA | WB | ELISA | WB | ELISA | WB | ELISA | WB | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sera | Np | P | P | Sera | Np | P | P | Sera | Np | P | P | Sera | Np | P | P | ||||
| 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 | ||||
| 2 | + | − | − | − | 24 | − | + | + | + | 57 | + | − | − | − | 82 | + | − | − | − |
| 3 | + | − | − | − | 25 | − | + | + | + | 60 | + | − | − | − | 83 | + | − | − | − |
| 4 | + | + | + | + | 26 | + | + | + | + | 61 | + | − | − | − | 84 | + | + | + | + |
| 5 | + | + | + | + | 27 | − | + | + | + | 62 | + | − | − | − | 85 | − | + | + | + |
| 6 | − | + | + | + | 28 | + | + | + | + | 63 | + | + | + | + | 87 | + | + | + | + |
| 7 | + | + | + | + | 29 | + | − | − | − | 64 | + | − | − | − | 89 | + | − | − | − |
| 8 | − | + | + | + | 30 | + | − | − | − | 65 | + | − | − | − | 90 | + | − | − | − |
| 9 | + | + | + | + | 32 | + | − | − | − | 66 | + | − | − | − | 91 | + | − | − | − |
| 10 | + | + | + | + | 33 | + | − | − | − | 67 | + | − | − | − | 114 | − | + | + | + |
| 11 | + | + | + | + | 36 | + | − | − | − | 70 | + | − | − | − | 117 | − | + | + | + |
| 12 | − | + | + | + | 38 | + | − | − | − | 71 | + | − | − | − | 120 | − | + | + | + |
| 18 | − | + | + | + | 41 | + | − | − | − | 74 | + | − | − | − | 121 | − | + | + | + |
| 19 | + | + | + | + | 42 | + | − | − | − | 75 | + | + | + | + | 124 | − | + | + | + |
| 20 | + | + | + | + | 45 | + | − | − | − | 76 | + | − | − | − | 125 | − | + | + | + |
| 21 | + | + | + | + | 46 | + | − | − | − | 78 | + | − | − | − | 130 | − | + | + | + |
| 22 | − | + | + | + | 53 | + | + | + | + | 80 | + | − | − | − | 131 | − | + | + | + |
| 23 | + | + | + | + | 54 | + | − | − | − | 81 | + | − | − | − | 132 | − | + | + | + |
| 2 | + | − | − | − | 15 | + | − | − | − | 28 | − | + | + | + | 45 | + | − | − | − |
| 3 | + | + | + | + | 16 | + | − | − | − | 35 | + | − | − | − | 64 | + | − | − | − |
| 13 | + | + | + | + | 26 | + | − | − | − | 41 | + | − | − | − | 65 | + | − | − | − |
μg/well used of each antigen fraction.