| Literature DB >> 29988186 |
Bruce B W Phiri1, Bagrey Ngwira2, Lawrence N Kazembe3.
Abstract
Schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections constitute a major public health problem in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa. In areas where prevalence of geo-helminths and schistosomes is high, co-infection with multiple parasite species is common, resulting in disproportionately elevated burden compared with single infections. Determining risk factors of co-infection intensity is important for better design of targeted interventions. In this paper, we examined risk factors of hookworm and S. haematobium co-infection intensity, in Chikwawa district, southern Malawi in 2005, using bivariate count models. Results show that hookworm and S. haematobium infections were much localised with small proportion of individuals harbouring more parasites especially among school-aged children. The risk of co-intensity with both hookworm and S. haematobium was high for all ages, although this diminished with increasing age, increased with fishing (hookworm: coefficient. = 12.29; 95% CI = 11.50-13.09; S. haematobium: 0.040; 95% CI = 0.0037, 3.832). Both infections were abundant in those with primary education (hookworm: coef. = 0.072; 95% CI = 0.056, 0.401 and S. haematobium: coef. = 0.286; 95% CI = 0.034, 0.538). However, much lower risk was observed for those who were farmers (hookworm: coef. = - 0.349, 95% CI = - 0.547,-0.150; S. haematobium: coef. - 0.239, 95% CI = - 0.406, - 0.072). In conclusion, our findings suggest that efforts to control helminths infection should be co-integrated and health promotion campaigns should be aimed at school-going children and adults who are in constant contact with water.Entities:
Keywords: Bivariate count models; Co-infection; Hookworm; Malawi; Polyparasitism; S. haematobium
Year: 2016 PMID: 29988186 PMCID: PMC5991826 DOI: 10.1016/j.parepi.2016.02.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasite Epidemiol Control ISSN: 2405-6731
Fig. 1Map of Chikhwawa District showing trial villages. Insert showing the geographical location of trial villages at a smaller scale. Intervention villages are in red and control villages are in blue.
Characteristics for individuals who had S. haematobium and hookworm (n = 1642).
| Variable | Mean | Std. Dev. | Number (%) | Hookworm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.7 | 17.77 | – | – | – | |
| Male | 733 (44.6) | 134 (8.0) | 137 (8.34) | ||
| Female | 909 (55.4) | 99 (6.0) | 187 (11.4) | ||
| None | 745 (45.4) | 146 (9.0) | 95 (5.8) | ||
| Primary | 850 (51.8) | 174 (10.6) | 132 (8) | ||
| Secondary | 47 (2.9) | 4 (0.24) | 6 (0.4) | ||
| Yes | 221 (13.5) | 51 (3.0) | 71 (4.3) | ||
| No | 1421 (86.5) | 182 (11.0) | 253 (15.4) | ||
| Yes | 1280 (78) | 205 (12.0) | 273 (16.6) | ||
| No | 362 (22) | 28 (1.7) | 51 (3.1) | ||
| Yes | 960 (58.5) | 172 (10.5) | 218 (13.3) | ||
| No | 682 (41.5) | 61 (3.7) | 106 (6.5) | ||
| Farmer | 733 (44.6) | 101 (6.2) | 220 (13.4) | ||
| Other | 909 (55.4 | 132 (8.0) | 104 (6.3) | ||
| Yes | 634 (38.6) | 73 (4.44) | 43 (2.6) | ||
| No | 386 (23.5) | 78 (4.8) | 130 (7.9) | ||
| missing | 622 (37.9) | 82 (5.0) | 151 (9.2) | ||
| Yes | 526 (32.0) | 78 (4.8) | 81 (4.9) | ||
| No | 482 (29.4) | 72 (4.40) | 89 (5.4) | ||
| missing | 634 (38.6) | 83 (5.1) | 154 (9.4) | ||
| none | 807 (49.2) | 0 | 0 | ||
| One | 594 (36.2) | 117 (7) | 167 (10.2) | ||
| Two | 200 (12.2) | 81 (5) | 129 (7.9) | ||
| Three | 38 (2.3) | 33 (2) | 25 (1.5) | ||
| four | 3 (0.2) | 2 (0.12) | 3 (0.18) | ||
| No | 805 (74.7) | 165 (10) | 259 (15.8) | ||
| Yes | 273 (25.3) | 68 (4.14) | 65 (4) |
Fig. 2Egg counts (per gram/ml) for S. haematobium and hookworm parasites.
Fig. 3Variation of hookworm and S. haematobium intensity in relation to age and sex of respondent.
Bivariate frequency for hookworm and S. haematobium parasite counts.
| Number of | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of hookworm parasite | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ≥ 8 | Cumulated records | |
| 0 | 677 | 23 | 30 | 19 | 16 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 75 | 865 | |
| 1 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 17 | |
| 2 | 37 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 53 | |
| 3 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 21 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 24 | |
| 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | |
| 6 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | |
| 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |
| ≥ 8 | 58 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 71 | |
| Cumulated records | 842 | 27 | 41 | 21 | 20 | 11 | 12 | 10 | 94 | 1078 | |
Summary of models fitted with corresponding model selection criteria.
| Model | Diagonal Distribution | Parameter | 2 | AIC | BIC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BP | NO | 33 | − 5819.10 | 11,624.76 | 11,797.96 |
| 2 | DP | NO | 32 | − 5779.38 | 11,622.76 | 11,790.71 |
| 3 | DIBP | Discrete(0) | 34 | − 4818.00 | 7447.40 | 7625.85 |
| 4 | DIBP | Discrete(1) | 35 | − 5054.14 | 7449.40 | 7633.10 |
| 5 | DIBP | Discrete(2) | 36 | − 5178.57 | 7451.40 | 7640.34 |
Models compared are Double Poisson (DP); Bivariate Poisson (BP); Diagonal Inflated Bivariate Poisson (DIBP);2LL: Log-likelihood; AIC: Akaike information criterion; BIC: Bayesian information criterion.
Regression estimates obtained from fitting bivariate Poisson models on hookworm and S. haematobium co-infection. Also given are estimates from a univariate Poisson model.
| Hookworm | Univariate model | Bivariate Poisson | Diagonal inflated bivariate Poisson | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef | 95% CI | Coef | 95% CI | Coef | 95% CI | ||||
| 0–5 years | 2.51 | 0.0024 | 5.02 | 1.36 | 0.0004 | 2.72 | 0.583 | − 0.10 | 1.27 |
| 6–15 years | 2.15 | 0.0031 | 4.30 | 9.68 | –0.0015 | 19.37 | 1.275 | 0.46 | 2.09 |
| 16–30 years | 0.99 | 0.0014 | 1.98 | 8.22 | 0.0016 | 16.45 | 0.321 | − 0.33 | 0.96 |
| 31–50 years | 1.07 | 0.0028 | 2.14 | 7.61 | –0.0001 | 15.22 | 0.424 | 0.08 | 0.76 |
| > 50 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| No | − 0.25 | 0.0005 | − 0.49 | − 6.34 | − 6.3362 | − 6.35 | − 0.132 | − 0.56 | 0.30 |
| Primary | − 0.32 | 0.0005 | − 0.63 | 2.25 | 0.0013 | 4.49 | 0.172 | − 0.06 | 0.40 |
| Secondary | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Male | 0.26 | − 0.0022 | 0.52 | 1.74 | 0.0006 | 3.49 | 1.039 | − 2.72 | 4.80 |
| Female | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Yes | − 0.44 | 0.0012 | − 0.88 | 1.37 | − 0.0008 | 2.75 | 1.032 | − 2.64 | 4.70 |
| No | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Yes | 13.31 | 0.0816 | 26.54 | 1.39 | 1.2489 | 1.53 | 12.29 | 11.50 | 13.09 |
| No | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Yes | 0.59 | − 0.0003 | 1.18 | 2.58 | − 0.0002 | 5.17 | − 1.136 | − 1.37 | − 0.90 |
| No | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Yes | − 1.02 | − 2.0446 | 0.00 | − 1.12 | 10.1061 | − 12.35 | 0.216 | − 0.11 | 0.54 |
| No | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Yes | − 0.41 | 0.0009 | − 0.81 | − 2.84 | − 0.0005 | − 5.68 | 0.294 | 0.19 | 0.42 |
| No | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Farmer | 0.50 | − 0.0017 | 1.01 | 7.52 | − 0.0032 | 15.04 | − 0.349 | − 0.55 | − 0.15 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 0-5 years | 0.29 | 0.0008 | 0.57 | 0.31 | 0.0001 | 0.63 | − 0.819 | − 1.69 | 0.05 |
| 6-15 years | 1.16 | − 0.0004 | 2.32 | 1.04 | − 0.0005 | 2.07 | 0.03 | − 0.80 | 0.86 |
| 16-30 years | 0.24 | − 0.0002 | 0.47 | 0.29 | − 0.0003 | 0.58 | − 0.347 | − 1.07 | 0.38 |
| 31-50 years | − 0.09 | − 0.0002 | − 0.17 | − 0.26 | 0.0002 | − 0.53 | − 0.862 | − 1.32 | − 0.33 |
| > 50 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| No | 0.99 | 0.0007 | 1.98 | 1.11 | 0.0004 | 2.22 | 1.744 | 1.22 | 2.27 |
| Primary | 1.01 | − 0.0011 | 2.02 | 1.24 | 0.0007 | 2.48 | 0.286 | 0.03 | 0.56 |
| Secondary | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Male | 0.07 | − 0.0003 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.0014 | 0.23 | 2.456 | − 0.75 | 5.66 |
| Female | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Yes | 1.49 | 0.0020 | 2.97 | 0.75 | 0.3356 | 1.17 | 2.581 | − 0.48 | 5.56 |
| No | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Yes | − 1.30 | − 0.0003 | − 2.61 | − 1.07 | − 0.0002 | − 2.15 | 0.04 | 0.0032 | 0.82 |
| No | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Yes | 0.85 | − 0.0002 | 1.70 | 0.80 | 0.0002 | 1.60 | 0.217 | − 0.0770 | 0.551 |
| No | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Yes | 0.61 | − 0.0003 | 1.22 | 0.69 | − 0.0010 | 1.38 | 0.365 | − 0.0130 | 0.744 |
| No | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Yes | − 0.28 | 0.0014 | − 0.55 | − 0.04 | 0.0006 | − 0.08 | − 0.002 | − 0.1260 | 0.122 |
| No | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Farmer | 0.46 | 0.0015 | 0.92 | 0.56 | 0.0013 | 1.12 | − 0.239 | − 0.4100 | − 0.072 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Models compared are univariate Poisson, bivariate Poisson and Diagonal inflated bivariate model. Standard errors were generated from 1000 bootstrap of estimate coefficients.