| Literature DB >> 29988176 |
Oluwaremilekun G Ajakaye1, Titus Adeniyi Olusi2, M O Oniya3.
Abstract
Geographic information systems are being increasingly used to show the distributions of disease where data for specific environmental risk factors are available. For successful transmission of schistosomiasis, suitable climatic conditions and biological events must coincide; hence its distribution and prevalence are greatly influenced by environmental factors affecting the population of snail intermediate hosts and human hosts. Prevalence and demographic data was obtained by parasitological examination of urine samples and questionnaire administration. The mean values of environmental factors corresponding to the local government area were obtained from remotely sensed images and data from climate research unit. The effects of the environmental factors were determined by using regression analysis to analyse the correlation of environmental factors to prevalence of schistosomiasis. There was a negative correlation between infection and elevation. There was a positive correlation between vegetation, rainfall, slope, temperature and prevalence of infection. There was also a weak negative correlation between proximity to water body and prevalence. The result shows the study area to be at low to high risk of infection.Entities:
Keywords: Correlation; Environmental Factors; Gis; Prevalence; Risk; Schistosomiasis
Year: 2016 PMID: 29988176 PMCID: PMC5991853 DOI: 10.1016/j.parepi.2016.03.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasite Epidemiol Control ISSN: 2405-6731
Prevalence of S. haematobium infection in relation to gender (P < 0.05).
| Sex | No examined | No (%) positive | No (%) negative |
|---|---|---|---|
| M | 356 | 76(21.3)a | 280(78.7) |
| F | 404 | 50(12.4)b | 354(87.6) |
| Total | 760 | 126(16.6) | 634(83.4) |
Prevalence of S. haematobium infection in relation to age (P < 0.05).
| Age | No examined | No (%) positive | No (%) negative |
|---|---|---|---|
| < 10 | 200 | 33(16.5)a | 167(83.5) |
| 10–19 | 251 | 59(23.5)b | 192(76.5) |
| 20–29 | 102 | 24(23.5)c | 78(76.5) |
| 30–39 | 76 | 6(7.9)d | 70(92.1) |
| 40–49 | 55 | 3(5.5)e | 52(94.5) |
| 50–59 | 33 | 1(3.0)f | 32(97.0) |
| > 59 | 43 | 0(0.0)g | 43(100.0) |
| Total | 760 | 126(16.6) | 634(83.4) |
Prevalence of S. haematobium infection in relation to occupation (P < 0.05).
| Occupation | No examined | No (%) positive | No (%) negative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student | 492 | 101(20.5)a | 391(79.5) |
| Fisherman | 4 | 1(25.0)b | 3(75.0) |
| Farmer | 45 | 3(6.7)c | 42(93.3) |
| Trader | 120 | 7(5.8)d | 113(94.2) |
| Skilled labour | 54 | 6(11.1)e | 48(88.9) |
| Civil servant | 25 | 7(28.0)f | 18(72.0) |
| Professional | 7 | 0(0.0)g | 7(100.0) |
| Others | 13 | 1(7.7)h | 12(92.3) |
| Total | 760 | 126(16.6) | 634(83.4) |
Fig. 1Map of (a) elevation, (b) landuse, (c) NDVI, (d) rainfall (e) slope, (f) temperature.
Fig. 3Graph of (a) elevation, (b) NDVI, (c) rainfall, (d) slope (e) LST, (f) proximity to water body.
Fig. 2Risk Map for S. haematobium in the study area.