Literature DB >> 29987880

These aren't the loci you'e looking for: Principles of effective SNP filtering for molecular ecologists.

Shannon J O'Leary1, Jonathan B Puritz2, Stuart C Willis1,3, Christopher M Hollenbeck4, David S Portnoy1.   

Abstract

Sequencing reduced-representation libraries of restriction site-associated DNA (RADseq) to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is quickly becoming a standard methodology for molecular ecologists. Because of the scale of RADseq data sets, putative loci cannot be assessed individually, making the process of filtering noise and correctly identifying biologically meaningful signal more difficult. Artefacts introduced during library preparation and/or bioinformatic processing of SNP data can create patterns that are incorrectly interpreted as indicative of population structure or natural selection. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully consider types of errors that may be introduced during laboratory work and data processing, and how to minimize, detect and remove these errors. Here, we discuss issues inherent to RADseq methodologies that can result in artefacts during library preparation and locus reconstruction resulting in erroneous SNP calls and, ultimately, genotyping error. Further, we describe steps that can be implemented to create a rigorously filtered data set consisting of markers accurately representing independent loci and compare the effect of different combinations of filters on four RAD data sets. At last, we stress the importance of publishing raw sequence data along with final filtered data sets in addition to detailed documentation of filtering steps and quality control measures.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  conservation genetics; ecological genetics; landscape genetics; molecular evolution; population ecology; population genetics-empirical

Year:  2018        PMID: 29987880     DOI: 10.1111/mec.14792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  40 in total

1.  Temperature-associated selection linked to putative chromosomal inversions in king scallop (Pecten maximus).

Authors:  Christopher M Hollenbeck; David S Portnoy; Daniel Garcia de la Serrana; Thorolf Magnesen; Iveta Matejusova; Ian A Johnston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Weak population genetic structure in Eurasian spruce bark beetle over large regional scales in Sweden.

Authors:  Simon Jacobsen Ellerstrand; Shruti Choudhury; Kajsa Svensson; Martin N Andersson; Carsten Kirkeby; Daniel Powell; Fredrik Schlyter; Anna Maria Jönsson; Mikkel Brydegaard; Bengt Hansson; Anna Runemark
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Population genomics for symbiotic anthozoans: can reduced representation approaches be used for taxa without reference genomes?

Authors:  Benjamin M Titus; Marymegan Daly
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.832

4.  pixy: Unbiased estimation of nucleotide diversity and divergence in the presence of missing data.

Authors:  Katharine L Korunes; Kieran Samuk
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  ADMIXPIPE: population analyses in ADMIXTURE for non-model organisms.

Authors:  Steven M Mussmann; Marlis R Douglas; Tyler K Chafin; Michael E Douglas
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  ddRAD Sequencing-Based Identification of Genomic Boundaries and Permeability in Quercus ilex and Q. suber Hybrids.

Authors:  Unai López de Heredia; Fernando Mora-Márquez; Pablo G Goicoechea; Laura Guillardín-Calvo; Marco C Simeone; Álvaro Soto
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Selecting RAD-Seq Data Analysis Parameters for Population Genetics: The More the Better?

Authors:  Natalia Díaz-Arce; Naiara Rodríguez-Ezpeleta
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Population genetic structure and predominance of cyclical parthenogenesis in the bird cherry-oat aphid Rhopalosiphum padi in England.

Authors:  Ramiro Morales-Hojas; Asier Gonzalez-Uriarte; Fernando Alvira Iraizoz; Todd Jenkins; Lynda Alderson; Tracey Kruger; Mike J Hall; Alex Greenslade; Chris R Shortall; James R Bell
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Genomic impact of severe population decline in a nomadic songbird.

Authors:  Ross Crates; George Olah; Marcin Adamski; Nicola Aitken; Sam Banks; Dean Ingwersen; Louis Ranjard; Laura Rayner; Dejan Stojanovic; Tomasz Suchan; Brenton von Takach Dukai; Robert Heinsohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  No evidence for genetic sex determination in Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Luca Cornetti; Dieter Ebert
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.