Literature DB >> 29987698

Genome sequence comparison between Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) DG44 cells and mouse using end sequences of CHO BAC clones based on BAC-FISH results.

Shuichi Kimura1, Takeshi Omasa2,3,4.   

Abstract

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells have frequently been used in biotechnology as a mammalian host cell platform for expressing genes of interest. Previously, we constructed a detailed physical chromosomal map of the CHO DG44 cell line by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) imaging using 303 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones as hybridization probes (BAC-FISH). BAC-FISH results revealed that the two longest chromosomes were completely paired. However, other chromosomes featured partial deletions or rearrangements. In this study, we determined the end sequences of 303 BAC clones (BAC end sequences), which were used for BAC-FISH probes. Among 606 BAC-end sequences (BESs) (forward and reverse ends), 558 could be determined. We performed a comparison between all determined BESs and mouse genome sequences using NCBI BLAST. Among these 558 BESs, 465 showed high homology to mouse chromosomal sequences. We analyzed the locations of these BACs in chromosomes of the CHO DG44 cell line using a physical chromosomal map. From the obtained results, we investigated the regional similarities among CHO chromosomes (A-T) and mouse chromosomes (1-19 and sex) about 217 BESs (46.7% of 465 high homologous BESs). Twenty-three specific narrow regions in 13 chromosomes of the CHO DG44 cell line showed high homology to mouse chromosomes, but most of other regions did not show significant correlations with the mouse genome. These results contribute to accurate alignments of chromosomes of Chinese hamster and its genome sequence, analysis of chromosomal instability in CHO cells, and the development of target locations for gene and/or genome editing techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy; BAC end sequence; Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell; Chromosome; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Genome sequence comparison

Year:  2018        PMID: 29987698      PMCID: PMC6214854          DOI: 10.1007/s10616-018-0233-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotechnology        ISSN: 0920-9069            Impact factor:   2.058


  28 in total

1.  Comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster defined by reciprocal chromosome painting.

Authors:  F Yang; P C O'Brien; M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Chromosome map of cosmid clones constructed with Chinese hamster genomic DNA.

Authors:  T Ono; S Sonta
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Production of recombinant protein therapeutics in cultivated mammalian cells.

Authors:  Florian M Wurm
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  25 years of recombinant proteins from reactor-grown cells - where do we go from here?

Authors:  David L Hacker; Maria De Jesus; Florian M Wurm
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 14.227

5.  High-resolution mapping of human chromosome 11 by in situ hybridization with cosmid clones.

Authors:  P Lichter; C J Tang; K Call; G Hermanson; G A Evans; D Housman; D C Ward
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A physical map of the human genome.

Authors:  J D McPherson; M Marra; L Hillier; R H Waterston; A Chinwalla; J Wallis; M Sekhon; K Wylie; E R Mardis; R K Wilson; R Fulton; T A Kucaba; C Wagner-McPherson; W B Barbazuk; S G Gregory; S J Humphray; L French; R S Evans; G Bethel; A Whittaker; J L Holden; O T McCann; A Dunham; C Soderlund; C E Scott; D R Bentley; G Schuler; H C Chen; W Jang; E D Green; J R Idol; V V Maduro; K T Montgomery; E Lee; A Miller; S Emerling; R Gibbs; S Scherer; J H Gorrell; E Sodergren; K Clerc-Blankenburg; P Tabor; S Naylor; D Garcia; P J de Jong; J J Catanese; N Nowak; K Osoegawa; S Qin; L Rowen; A Madan; M Dors; L Hood; B Trask; C Friedman; H Massa; V G Cheung; I R Kirsch; T Reid; R Yonescu; J Weissenbach; T Bruls; R Heilig; E Branscomb; A Olsen; N Doggett; J F Cheng; T Hawkins; R M Myers; J Shang; L Ramirez; J Schmutz; O Velasquez; K Dixon; N E Stone; D R Cox; D Haussler; W J Kent; T Furey; S Rogic; S Kennedy; S Jones; A Rosenthal; G Wen; M Schilhabel; G Gloeckner; G Nyakatura; R Siebert; B Schlegelberger; J Korenberg; X N Chen; A Fujiyama; M Hattori; A Toyoda; T Yada; H S Park; Y Sakaki; N Shimizu; S Asakawa; K Kawasaki; T Sasaki; A Shintani; A Shimizu; K Shibuya; J Kudoh; S Minoshima; J Ramser; P Seranski; C Hoff; A Poustka; R Reinhardt; H Lehrach
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Genetics of somatic mammalian cells, VII. Induction and isolation of nutritional mutants in Chinese hamster cells.

Authors:  F T Kao; T T Puck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Advancing mammalian cell culture engineering using genome-scale technologies.

Authors:  Timothy J Griffin; Gargi Seth; Hongwei Xie; Sricharan Bandhakavi; Wei-Shou Hu
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 19.536

9.  The genomic sequence of the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cell line.

Authors:  Xun Xu; Harish Nagarajan; Nathan E Lewis; Shengkai Pan; Zhiming Cai; Xin Liu; Wenbin Chen; Min Xie; Wenliang Wang; Stephanie Hammond; Mikael R Andersen; Norma Neff; Benedetto Passarelli; Winston Koh; H Christina Fan; Jianbin Wang; Yaoting Gui; Kelvin H Lee; Michael J Betenbaugh; Stephen R Quake; Iman Famili; Bernhard O Palsson; Jun Wang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Comprehensive genome and epigenome characterization of CHO cells in response to evolutionary pressures and over time.

Authors:  Julia Feichtinger; Inmaculada Hernández; Christoph Fischer; Michael Hanscho; Norbert Auer; Matthias Hackl; Vaibhav Jadhav; Martina Baumann; Peter M Krempl; Christian Schmidl; Matthias Farlik; Michael Schuster; Angelika Merkel; Andreas Sommer; Simon Heath; Daniel Rico; Christoph Bock; Gerhard G Thallinger; Nicole Borth
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.