Literature DB >> 29987695

Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of rectal lesions with the da Vinci Xi (dVXi): technical considerations and video vignette.

C D Warren1,2, A E R Hamilton3,4, A R L Stevenson3,5,4.   

Abstract

Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) (RT) represents a compelling new alternative capable of overcoming the limitations of conventional TAMIS for the local excision of rectal lesions. We describe our RT technique using the dVXi™ (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) which we have used to efficiently and completely excise eight cases of rectal lesions which were not endoscopically resectable. We also include a video vignette of the procedure. With the patient in the prone jackknife position, we insert a GelPOINT™ Path Transanal Access Platform (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA) in combination with the dVXi and AirSeal™ insufflation system (Conmed, Niagara. Falls, ON, Canada). Our technique aims to be ergonomically efficient to minimise docking difficulties and to reduce instrument clash in the limited space, whilst maximising the capabilities of the dVXi for RT. At 3-month endoscopic follow-up, no evidence of recurrence was detected in any of the eight patients. RT is safe, feasible and has advantages over conventional laparoscopic TAMIS (LT). Our described technique addresses some of the long-standing challenges of LT and the novel RT. The immediate challenge to its widespread use remains the cost, expertise and availability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic TAMIS; Robotic transanal surgery (RTAS); Transanal endoscopic surgery (TEM); Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS)

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29987695     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1816-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  14 in total

1.  Robotic TransAnal Minimally Invasive Surgery in a cadaveric model.

Authors:  S B Atallah; M R Albert; T H deBeche-Adams; S W Larach
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  The outcome of rectal cancer after early salvage TME following TEM compared with primary TME: a case-matched study.

Authors:  O Bulut; K Levic; P Hesselfeldt; S Bülow
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms.

Authors:  R Hompes; S M Rauh; F Ris; J B Tuynman; N J Mortensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Which technique to choose in the high-tech era of minimal-access rectal cancer surgery?

Authors:  Manish Chand; Brendan Moran; Steve D Wexner
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Robotic transanal surgery (RTAS) with utilization of a next-generation single-port system: a cadaveric feasibility study.

Authors:  J Marks; S Ng; T Mak
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Methylene blue submucosal infiltration may facilitate transanal submucosal dissection.

Authors:  T J Cuda; A D Riddell; D A Westwood; A E R Hamilton; A R L Stevenson
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Robotic transanal surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasia, transanal total mesorectal excision, and repair of complex fistulae: clinical experience with the first 18 cases at a single institution.

Authors:  S Atallah; B Martin-Perez; E Parra-Davila; T deBeche-Adams; G Nassif; M Albert; S Larach
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 8.  Transanal endoscopic surgery in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Xavier Serra-Aracil; Laura Mora-Lopez; Manel Alcantara-Moral; Aleidis Caro-Tarrago; Carlos Javier Gomez-Diaz; Salvador Navarro-Soto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery for benign large rectal polyps and early malignant rectal cancers: experience and outcomes from the first Canadian centre to adopt the technique.

Authors:  Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Henry Y Jiang; Erica L Kohtakangas
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David Jayne; Alessio Pigazzi; Helen Marshall; Julie Croft; Neil Corrigan; Joanne Copeland; Phil Quirke; Nick West; Tero Rautio; Niels Thomassen; Henry Tilney; Mark Gudgeon; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Richard Edlin; Claire Hulme; Julia Brown
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Current Status of the Management of Stage I Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Craig Howard Olson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Robotic Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Potential, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Authors:  Ge Liu; Shoujia Zhang; Yan Zhang; Xiaoqing Fu; Xinlu Liu
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-04-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.