Literature DB >> 29987621

Quantitative Intensity Harmonization of Dopamine Transporter SPECT Images Using Gamma Mixture Models.

Alberto Llera1, Ismael Huertas2,3, Pablo Mir4, Christian F Beckmann1,5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Differences in site, device, and/or settings may cause large variations in the intensity profile of dopamine transporter (DAT) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images. However, the current standard to evaluate these images, the striatal binding ratio (SBR), does not efficiently account for this heterogeneity and the assessment can be unequivalent across distinct acquisition pipelines. In this work, we present a voxel-based automated approach to intensity normalize such type of data that improves on cross-session interpretation. PROCEDURES: The normalization method consists of a reparametrization of the voxel values based on the cumulative density function (CDF) of a Gamma distribution modeling the specific region intensity. The harmonization ability was tested in 1342 SPECT images from the PPMI repository, acquired with 7 distinct gamma camera models and at 24 different sites. We compared the striatal quantification across distinct cameras for raw intensities, SBR values, and after applying the Gamma CDF (GDCF) harmonization. As a proof-of-concept, we evaluated the impact of GCDF normalization in a classification task between controls and Parkinson disease patients.
RESULTS: Raw striatal intensities and SBR values presented significant differences across distinct camera models. We demonstrate that GCDF normalization efficiently alleviated these differences in striatal quantification and with values constrained to a fixed interval [0, 1]. Also, our method allowed a fully automated image assessment that provided maximal classification ability, given by an area under the curve (AUC) of AUC = 0.94 when used mean regional variables and AUC = 0.98 when used voxel-based variables.
CONCLUSION: The GCDF normalization method is useful to standardize the intensity of DAT SPECT images in an automated fashion and enables the development of unbiased algorithms using multicenter datasets. This method may constitute a key pre-processing step in the analysis of this type of images.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dopamine transporter; Gamma distribution; Intensity normalization; Multicenter studies; PPMI; SPECT

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29987621     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-018-1217-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  16 in total

1.  SNM practice guideline for dopamine transporter imaging with 123I-ioflupane SPECT 1.0.

Authors:  David S W Djang; Marcel J R Janssen; Nicolaas Bohnen; Jan Booij; Theodore A Henderson; Karl Herholz; Satoshi Minoshima; Christopher C Rowe; Osama Sabri; John Seibyl; Bart N M Van Berckel; Michele Wanner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL.

Authors:  Mark W Woolrich; Saad Jbabdi; Brian Patenaude; Michael Chappell; Salima Makni; Timothy Behrens; Christian Beckmann; Mark Jenkinson; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Calibration of gamma camera systems for a multicentre European ¹²³I-FP-CIT SPECT normal database.

Authors:  Livia Tossici-Bolt; John C Dickson; Terez Sera; Robin de Nijs; Maria Claudia Bagnara; Catherine Jonsson; Egon Scheepers; Felicia Zito; Anita Seese; Pierre Malick Koulibaly; Ozlem L Kapucu; Michel Koole; Maria Raith; Jean George; Markus Nowak Lonsdale; Wolfgang Münzing; Klaus Tatsch; Andrea Varrone
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Linear intensity normalization of FP-CIT SPECT brain images using the α-stable distribution.

Authors:  Diego Salas-Gonzalez; Juan M Górriz; Javier Ramírez; Ignacio A Illán; Elmar W Lang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  European multicentre database of healthy controls for [123I]FP-CIT SPECT (ENC-DAT): age-related effects, gender differences and evaluation of different methods of analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Varrone; John C Dickson; Livia Tossici-Bolt; Terez Sera; Susanne Asenbaum; Jan Booij; Ozlem L Kapucu; Andreas Kluge; Gitte M Knudsen; Pierre Malick Koulibaly; Flavio Nobili; Marco Pagani; Osama Sabri; Thierry Vander Borght; Koen Van Laere; Klaus Tatsch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  The role of molecular imaging in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism.

Authors:  J Booij; L K Teune; H J Verberne
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.346

Review 7.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research.

Authors:  Russell A Poldrack; Chris I Baker; Joke Durnez; Krzysztof J Gorgolewski; Paul M Matthews; Marcus R Munafò; Thomas E Nichols; Jean-Baptiste Poline; Edward Vul; Tal Yarkoni
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Comparison between Different Intensity Normalization Methods in 123I-Ioflupane Imaging for the Automatic Detection of Parkinsonism.

Authors:  A Brahim; J Ramírez; J M Górriz; L Khedher; D Salas-Gonzalez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Practical Guide for Improving Transparency and Reproducibility in Neuroimaging Research.

Authors:  Krzysztof J Gorgolewski; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  2 in total

1.  Data harmonisation for information fusion in digital healthcare: A state-of-the-art systematic review, meta-analysis and future research directions.

Authors:  Yang Nan; Javier Del Ser; Simon Walsh; Carola Schönlieb; Michael Roberts; Ian Selby; Kit Howard; John Owen; Jon Neville; Julien Guiot; Benoit Ernst; Ana Pastor; Angel Alberich-Bayarri; Marion I Menzel; Sean Walsh; Wim Vos; Nina Flerin; Jean-Paul Charbonnier; Eva van Rikxoort; Avishek Chatterjee; Henry Woodruff; Philippe Lambin; Leonor Cerdá-Alberich; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; Francisco Herrera; Guang Yang
Journal:  Inf Fusion       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 17.564

2.  Mapping dopaminergic projections in the human brain with resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Koen V Haak; Christian F Beckmann; Marianne Oldehinkel; Alberto Llera; Myrthe Faber; Ismael Huertas; Jan K Buitelaar; Bastiaan R Bloem; Andre F Marquand; Rick C Helmich
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 8.140

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.