Literature DB >> 29987612

Impact of Screening Mammography on Treatment in Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer.

Soojin Ahn1, Margaux Wooster1, Christopher Valente1, Erin Moshier1, Ru Meng1, Kereeti Pisapati1, Ronald Couri1, Laurie Margolies1, Hank Schmidt1, Elisa Port2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality; however, screening recommendations, ordering, and compliance remain suboptimal and controversies regarding the value of screening persist. We evaluated the influence of screening mammography on the extent of breast cancer treatment.
METHODS: Patients ≥ 40 years of age diagnosed with breast cancer from September 2008 to May 2016 at a single institution were divided into two groups: those with screening 1-24 months prior to diagnosis, and those with screening at 25+ months, including patients with no prior mammography. The association between the two groups and various clinical factors were assessed using logistic regression models. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age groups.
RESULTS: Analysis included 1125 patients, 819 (73%) with screening at 1-24 months, and 306 (27%) with screening at 25+ months, including 65 (6%) who never had mammography. Overall, patients in the 25+ months group were more likely to receive chemotherapy [odds ratio (OR) 1.51, p = 0.0040], undergo mastectomy (OR 1.32, p = 0.0465), and require axillary dissection (AD; OR 1.66, p = 0.0045) than those in 1-24 months group. On subgroup analysis, patients aged 40-49 years with no prior mammography were more likely to have larger tumors (p = 0.0323) and positive nodes (OR 4.52, p = 0.0058), undergo mastectomy (OR 3.44, p = 0.0068), undergo AD (OR 4.64, p = 0.0002), and require chemotherapy (OR 2.52, p = 0.0287) than the 1-24 months group.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening mammography is associated with decreased stage at diagnosis and receipt of less-extensive treatment. This was evident in all groups, including the 40-49 years age group, where controversy exists on whether screening is even necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29987612     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6646-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  8 in total

1.  Breast cancer screening policy-good science should trump bad politics.

Authors:  M J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  How Did CNBSS Influence Guidelines for So Long and What Can That Teach Us?

Authors:  Shushiela Appavoo
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Marrying Story with Science: The Impact of Outdated and Inconsistent Breast Cancer Screening Practices in Canada.

Authors:  Jennie Dale; Michelle Di Tomaso; Victoria Gay
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Leveraging breast cancer screening to promote timely detection, diagnosis and treatment among women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Vida Nyagre Yakong; Agani Afaya; Robert Kaba Alhassan; Somin Sang; Solomon Mohammed Salia; Richard Adongo Afaya; Jebuni Fuseini Karim; Anthony Kuug; Daniels-Donkor Silas Selorm; Confidence Alorse Atakro; Renna Akokre; Peter Adatara; Martin Amogre Ayanore
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 5.  Overview in Breast Cancer Screening in Lebanon.

Authors:  Eman Sbaity; Rachelle Bejjany; Malek Kreidieh; Sally Temraz; Ali Shamseddine
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

6.  Misinformation and Facts about Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Impact of COVID-19 Restrictions on Stage of Breast Cancer at Presentation and Time to Treatment at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital.

Authors:  Kelly A Kapp; An-Lin Cheng; Catherine M Bruton; Nasim Ahmadiyeh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.339

8.  Benefits and Risks of Mammography Screening in Women Ages 40 to 49 Years.

Authors:  Lars J Grimm; Carolyn S Avery; Edward Hendrick; Jay A Baker
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.