Michele Valmasoni1,2, Elisa Sefora Pierobon3, Gianpietro Zanchettin3, Dario Briscolini3, Lucia Moletta3,4, Alberto Ruol3, Renato Salvador3,4, Stefano Merigliano3,4. 1. Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Center for Esophageal Disease, University of Padova, Padua, Italy. michele.valmasoni@unipd.it. 2. University Hospital, Padua, Italy. michele.valmasoni@unipd.it. 3. Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Center for Esophageal Disease, University of Padova, Padua, Italy. 4. University Hospital, Padua, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined optimal treatment specifically for cervical esophageal carcinoma. This study evaluated the outcome of three common treatment strategies with a focus on the debated role of surgery. METHODS: All patients with cervical esophageal cancer treated at a single center were identified and their outcomes analyzed in terms of morbidity, mortality, and recurrence according to the treatment they received, i.e. surgery alone, definitive platinum-based chemoradiation (CRT), or CRT followed by surgery. RESULTS: The study population included 148 patients with cervical esophageal cancer from a prospective database of 3445 patients. Primary surgery was the treatment of choice for 56 (37.83%) patients, definitive CRT was the treatment of choice for 52 (35.13%) patients, and CRT followed by surgery was the treatment of choice for 40 (27.02%) patients. CRT-treated patients obtained 36.96% complete clinical response, with overall morbidity and mortality rates of 36.95 and 2.17%, respectively. Surgical complete resection was achieved in 71.88% of surgically treated cases, with morbidity and mortality rates of 52.17 and 6.25%, respectively. No significant survival difference existed among the three treatments, but patients who underwent surgery alone had a significantly lower stage of disease (p = 0.031). Compared with patients with complete response after CRT, surgery did not confer any significant survival benefit, and overall 5-year survival was lower than definitive CRT alone. In contrast, surgery improved survival significantly in patients with non-complete response after definitive CRT (p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Definitive platinum-based CRT should be the treatment of choice for cervical esophageal cancer. Surgery has a role for patients with non-complete response as it adds significant survival benefit, with acceptable morbidity and mortality.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined optimal treatment specifically for cervical esophageal carcinoma. This study evaluated the outcome of three common treatment strategies with a focus on the debated role of surgery. METHODS: All patients with cervical esophageal cancer treated at a single center were identified and their outcomes analyzed in terms of morbidity, mortality, and recurrence according to the treatment they received, i.e. surgery alone, definitive platinum-based chemoradiation (CRT), or CRT followed by surgery. RESULTS: The study population included 148 patients with cervical esophageal cancer from a prospective database of 3445 patients. Primary surgery was the treatment of choice for 56 (37.83%) patients, definitive CRT was the treatment of choice for 52 (35.13%) patients, and CRT followed by surgery was the treatment of choice for 40 (27.02%) patients. CRT-treated patients obtained 36.96% complete clinical response, with overall morbidity and mortality rates of 36.95 and 2.17%, respectively. Surgical complete resection was achieved in 71.88% of surgically treated cases, with morbidity and mortality rates of 52.17 and 6.25%, respectively. No significant survival difference existed among the three treatments, but patients who underwent surgery alone had a significantly lower stage of disease (p = 0.031). Compared with patients with complete response after CRT, surgery did not confer any significant survival benefit, and overall 5-year survival was lower than definitive CRT alone. In contrast, surgery improved survival significantly in patients with non-complete response after definitive CRT (p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Definitive platinum-based CRT should be the treatment of choice for cervical esophageal cancer. Surgery has a role for patients with non-complete response as it adds significant survival benefit, with acceptable morbidity and mortality.
Authors: Armando De Virgilio; Andrea Costantino; Carlo Castoro; Giuseppe Spriano; Bianca Maria Festa; Giuseppe Mercante; Davide Franceschini; Ciro Franzese; Marta Scorsetti; Andrea Marrari; Raffaele Cavina; Salvatore Marano Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Judith de Vos-Geelen; Sandra Me Geurts; Margreet van Putten; Liselot Bj Valkenburg-van Iersel; Heike I Grabsch; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Frank Jp Hoebers; Chantal V Hoge; Paul M Jeene; Evelien Jm de Jong; Hanneke Wm van Laarhoven; Tom Rozema; Marije Slingerland; Vivianne Cg Tjan-Heijnen; Grard Ap Nieuwenhuijzen; Valery Epp Lemmens Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2019-12-21 Impact factor: 5.742