Literature DB >> 29987098

Rural-Urban Disparities in Time to Diagnosis and Treatment for Colorectal and Breast Cancer.

Rebecca J Bergin1,2, Jon Emery2, Ruth C Bollard3, Alina Zalounina Falborg4, Henry Jensen4, David Weller5, Usha Menon6, Peter Vedsted4, Robert J Thomas2,7,8, Kathryn Whitfield7, Victoria White9,10.   

Abstract

Background: Longer cancer pathways may contribute to rural-urban survival disparities, but research in this area is lacking. We investigated time to diagnosis and treatment for rural and urban patients with colorectal or breast cancer in Victoria, Australia.
Methods: Population-based surveys (2013-2014) of patients (aged ≥40, approached within 6 months of diagnosis), primary care physicians (PCPs), and specialists were collected as part of the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership, Module 4. Six intervals were examined: patient (symptom to presentation), primary care (presentation to referral), diagnostic (presentation/screening to diagnosis), treatment (diagnosis to treatment), health system (presentation to treatment), and total interval (symptom/screening to treatment). Rural and urban intervals were compared using quantile regression including age, sex, insurance, and socioeconomic status.
Results: 433 colorectal (48% rural) and 489 breast (42% rural) patients, 621 PCPs, and 370 specialists participated. Compared with urban patients, patients with symptomatic colorectal cancer from rural areas had significantly longer total intervals at the 50th [18 days longer, 95% confidence interval (CI): 9-27], 75th (53, 95% CI: 47-59), and 90th percentiles (44, 95% CI: 40-48). These patients also had longer diagnostic and health system intervals (6-85 days longer). Breast cancer intervals were similar by area of residence, except the patient interval, which was shorter for rural patients with either cancer in the higher percentiles.Conclusions: Rural residence was associated with longer total intervals for colorectal but not breast cancer; with most disparities postpresentation.Impact: Interventions targeting time from presentation to diagnosis may help reduce colorectal cancer rural-urban disparities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(9); 1036-46. ©2018 AACR. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29987098     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  14 in total

1.  Decision support tools to improve cancer diagnostic decision making in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sophie Chima; Jeanette C Reece; Kristi Milley; Shakira Milton; Jennifer G McIntosh; Jon D Emery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Does it matter where you get your surgery for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Mohammad Hamidi; Kamil Hanna; Pamela Omesiete; Alejandro Cruz; Agnes Ewongwo; Viraj Pandit; Bellal Joseph; Valentine Nfonsam
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Outcomes: Opportunities for Future Research.

Authors:  Smita Bhatia; Wendy Landier; Electra D Paskett; Katherine B Peters; Janette K Merrill; Jonathan Phillips; Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 11.816

4.  Return on Investment of Free Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests in a Primarily Rural Uninsured or Underinsured Population in Northeast Texas.

Authors:  Gabriela Orsak; Anastasia Miller; Carlton M Allen; Karan P Singh; Paul McGaha
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2020-03

5.  Emerging cancer incidence, mortality, hospitalisation and associated burden among Australian cancer patients, 1982 - 2014: an incidence-based approach in terms of trends, determinants and inequality.

Authors:  Rashidul Alam Mahumud; Khorshed Alam; Jeff Dunn; Jeff Gow
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Health service inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic among elderly people living in large urban and non-urban areas in Florida, USA.

Authors:  Xinhua Yu
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-11-24

7.  Predictors of At-Home Death for Cancer Patients in Rural Clinics in Japan.

Authors:  Jun Watanabe; Hiroyuki Teraura; Kenichi Komatsu; Hironori Yamaguchi; Kazuhiko Kotani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Rural disparities in surgical care from gynecologic oncologists among Midwestern ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Kristin Weeks; Charles F Lynch; Michele West; Ryan Carnahan; Michael O'Rorke; Jacob Oleson; Megan McDonald; Sherri L Stewart; Mary Charlton
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Impact of Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status over Time on the Long-term Survival of Adolescent and Young Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors.

Authors:  Amy M Berkman; Clark R Andersen; Vidya Puthenpura; J Andrew Livingston; Sairah Ahmed; Branko Cuglievan; Michelle A T Hildebrandt; Michael E Roth
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Reliance on Self-Medication Increase Delays in Diagnosis and Management of GI Cancers: Results From Nepal.

Authors:  Soniya Dulal; Bishnu Dutta Paudel; Lori Anne Wood; Prakash Neupane; Aarati Shah; Bibek Acharya; Ramila Shilpakar; Sandhya Chapagain Acharya; Ambuj Karn; Bishal Poudel; Rameej Revanta Thapa; Albira Acharya; Michael Gary Martin
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.