| Literature DB >> 29986430 |
Guangyang Liu1, Ruonan Zhang2, Lingyun Li3, Xiaodong Huang4, Tengfei Li5, Meng Lu6, Donghui Xu7, Jing Wang8.
Abstract
Monitoring of low levels of chlorsulfuron in environmentalEntities:
Keywords: acetamiprid; agricultural irrigation water; anti-agglomeration behavior; chlorsulfuron; colorimetric sensing; gold nanoparticle
Year: 2018 PMID: 29986430 PMCID: PMC6070799 DOI: 10.3390/nano8070499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(a) AuNPs (black line), (b) AuNPS with 2.0 mg/L chlorsulfuron (red line), (c) AuNPS with 2.0 mg/L chlorsulfuron and 2.0 mg/L acetamiprid (blue line), (d) AuNPS with 20 mg/L acetamiprid (green line).
Figure 2TEM images of (a) AuNPs, (b) AuNPS with 2.0 mg/L chlorsulfuron and 20 mg/L chlorsulfuron, (c) AuNPS with 20 mg/L acetamiprid.
Figure 3FT-IR spectra of: chlorsulfuron, chlorsulfuron, the complex of acetamiprid and chlorsulfuron.
Figure 4Schematic illustration of Colorimetric sensing of chlorsulfuron based on anti-aggregation of gold nanoparticles in the presence of acetamiprid.
Figure 5The plots of ΔA versus chlorsulfuron concentration under (a) different concentration of acetamiprid and (b) different pH condition.
Figure 6(A) UV-Vis spectra and a photograph of (a) AuNP solutions, AuNP solutions with concentrations of chlorsulfuron of (b) 100 mg/L , (c) 50 mg/L, (d) 20 mg/L, (e) 10 mg/L, (f) 5.0 mg/L, (g) 2.0 mg/L, (h) 1.0 mg/L, (i) 0.5 mg/L, (j) 0.2 mg/L, (k) 0.1 mg/L (l) 0 mg/L in the presence of 20 mg/L acetamiprid and (B) standard calibration curve of the absorbance change of AuNPs at 523 nm (ΔA) against chlorsulfuron concentration.
Comparison of the linear ranges and detection limits of different methods. LOD: Limit of Detection; HPLC-CAD: Liquid Chromatography-Charged Aerosol Detector; HPLC-UV: Liquid Chromatography-Ultraviolet Detector.
| Methods | Linear Range (mg/L) | LOD (mg/L) | R2 | Matrices | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPLC-CAD | 0.01–1.0 | 0.01–0.05 | 0.999 | Grain, straw, green plant | [ |
| HPLC-UV | 0.02–5 | 0.08 | 0.999 | Soil | [ |
| Fluorescence detection | 0.01–1.0 | 0.01 | 0.999 | Environmental water | [ |
| Electrochemical Immunoassay | - | 0.005 | - | Environmental water | [ |
| Anti-aggregation-AuNPs based UV–Vis detection | 0.1–100 | 0.05 | 0.957 | Irrigation water | This work |
Figure 7Absorption change ΔA of AuNPs in the presence of chlorsulfuron and other interfering substances.
Recoveries of chlorsulfuron in water samples (n = 3). RSD: Relative Standard Deviations.
| Samples | Spiked (mg/L) | Found (mg/L) | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) | LOD (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tap water | 0 | - | - | - | 0.125 |
| 0.5 | 0.421 | 84.1 | 4.25 | ||
| 1.0 | 0.817 | 81.7 | 3.62 | ||
| 5.0 | 4.52 | 90.4 | 6.47 | ||
| Well water | 0 | - | - | - | 0.25 |
| 0.5 | 0.382 | 76.3 | 7.34 | ||
| 1.0 | 0.785 | 78.5 | 4.19 | ||
| 5.0 | 4.71 | 94.2 | 5.62 |