| Literature DB >> 29986416 |
Daniele Naviglio1, Andrea Formato2, Giampiero Scaglione3, Domenico Montesano4, Arcangelo Pellegrino5, Francesco Villecco6, Monica Gallo7.
Abstract
This research aimed to determine the effects of cryo-maceration at different temperatures on polyphenol content during the winemaking process of Chardonnay wine. Samples of Chardonnay grapes were subjected to rapid cooling processes by direct injection of liquid CO₂ to obtain final temperatures of 10.0, 8.0, 6.0 and 4.0 °C and yield different batches of grape mash. Subsequently, each batch underwent the winemaking process to produce four different wines. The wines obtained were characterized by chemical analyses. We observed higher extraction of polyphenolic compounds with low-temperature cold maceration, particularly when the temperature was reduced from 10.0 to 6.0 °C. Conversely, when the temperature was reduced below 6.0 °C, the increase in polyphenol content in wine was negligible, whereas CO₂ consumption increased. Furthermore, a numerical simulation was performed to determine the pipe length, L₀, after which the temperature was constant. This condition is very important because it guarantees that after the length L₀, the thermodynamic exchange between liquid CO₂ and is complete, eliminating the possibility of liquid CO₂ pockets in the cyclone.Entities:
Keywords: Chardonnay grapes; cryo-maceration; liquid carbon dioxide; numerical simulation; polyphenols
Year: 2018 PMID: 29986416 PMCID: PMC6069240 DOI: 10.3390/foods7070107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Grape cryomaceration equipment with liquid CO2.
Figure 2Finite volume model of the pipeline.
Characteristics of the fluids.
| Properties | Grape Juice | Liquid CO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Density (kg/m3) | 1300 | 1032 |
| Cp (J/kg K) | 2710 | 2050 |
| Thermal conductibility (w/m K) | 0.61 | 0.132 |
| Viscosity (kg/m s) | 0.001003 | 0.00014 |
Boundary conditions considered.
| Conditions | Grape Juice | Liquid CO2 | Mixture |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inlet | |||
| Outlet | |||
| Wall | adiabatic | adiabatic | adiabatic |
Values of the characteristics parameters for the four considered cases Tout (°C) = Final temperature plant set up; Tin (°C) = initial temperature of mashed grape.
| Case | DT | Mashed Grapes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37 | 10.0 | 27.0 ± 0.5 | 5.6 |
| 2 | 8.0 | 29.0 ± 0.5 | ||
| 3 | 6.0 | 31.0 ± 0.5 | ||
| 4 | 4.0 | 33.0 ± 0.5 |
Figure 3Temperature distribution in the median section of the pipeline and flow pattern-case 4, Table 3.
Figure 4Turbulent kinetic energy distribution in the median section of the pipeline.
Figure 5Temperature distribution of the mashed grape along the axis of the pipeline, for each case reported in the above Table 3 (T (°C) = initial temperature of mashed grape; T (°C) = Final temperature plant set up; DT = T).
Analytical determinations performed on wines made from grapes subjected to cryomaceration processes at different final temperatures (Chardonnay grape).
| Parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol (%) ( | 11.43 ± 0.30 a | 11.42 ± 0.10 a | 11.41 ± 0.20 a | 11.40 ± 0.10 a |
| Density 20.0 °C | 0.9901 ± 0.002 a | 0.9901 ± 0.001 a | 0.9901 ± 0.010 a | 0.9901 ± 0.003 a |
| Titratable acidity (g/L) | 6.05 ± 0.05 a | 6.03 ± 0.02 a | 6.00 ± 0.03 a | 6.00 ± 0.01 a |
| Volatile acidity (g/L) | 0.30 ± 0.02 a | 0.31 ± 0.01 a | 0.30 ± 0.01 a | 0.3 ± 0.02 a |
| Total extract (g/L) | 21.00 ± 0.48 a | 21.90 ± 0.51 a | 22.70 ± 0.46 a | 22.73 ± 0.59 a |
| pH | 3.20 ± 0.06 a | 3.23 ± 0.05 a | 3.25 ± 0.02 a | 3.26 ± 0.03 a |
| OD 420 nm | 0.11 ± 0.01 a | 0.15 ± 0.03 a | 0.162 ± 0.04 a | 0.163 ± 0.02 b |
| OD 320 nm | 6.9 ± 0.72 a | 7.7 ± 0.53 a | 8.4 ± 0.77 a | 8.5 ± 0.54 b |
| OD 280 nm | 8.5 ± 0.74 a | 9.3 ± 0.67 a | 10.8 ± 0.75 a | 10.9 ± 0.69 b |
| Total phenols (mg/L) | 233.5 ± 13.5 a | 336.4 ± 12.7 a | 438.4 ± 14.7 a | 440.4 ± 12.5 b |
| Catechins (mg/L) | 18.3 ± 0.24 a | 18.5 ± 0.32 a | 18.7 ± 0.24 a | 18.9 ± 0.33 b |
| (+)-Catechin (mg/L) | 3.39 ± 0.02 a | 3.40 ± 0.01 a | 3.42 ± 0.03 a | 3.43 ± 0.01 b |
| (−)-Epicatechin (mg/L) | 20.5 ± 3.7 a | 21.3 ± 2.9 a | 22.5 ± 3.9 a | 22.9 ± 2.8 b |
| Proanthocyanidins (mg/L) | 38 ± 2 a | 46 ± 5 a | 50 ± 3 a | 51 ± 4 b |
OD optical density; (Mean value ± dxm = standard deviation of the mean). Analysis of variance (ANOVA): mean values within different columns designated by different letters are significantly different by the Fisher’s tests at p ≤ 0.005; mean values within different columns designated by the same letters are not significantly different by the Fisher’s tests at p ≤ 0.005.
Sensory analysis: scores range from 1 to 100, in which the value 100 corresponds to the lowest quality.
| Treated Grape | Visual | Smelling | Gustatory | Harmony | Scores |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chardonnay 10.0 °C | 6.7 ± 1.2 b | 13.2 ± 2.5 b | 19.0 ± 1.5 b | 8.0 ± 2.0 b | 46.3 ± 4.7 |
| Chardonnay 8.0 °C | 5.9 ± 1.1 c | 11.3 ± 2.6 c | 18.4 ± 1.7 c | 9.9 ± 2.4 c | 43.9 ± 6.9 |
| Chardonnay 6.0 °C | 5.1 ± 1.3 d | 10.1 ± 2.7 b | 17.1 ± 1.6 c | 9.1 ± 2.6 d | 41.4 ± 6.7 |
| Chardonnay 4.0 °C | 5.2 ± 1.1 d | 10.2 ± 2.6 b | 17.2 ± 1.8 c | 9.1 ± 2.5 d | 41.7 ± 6.9 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA): mean values within different columns designated by different letters are significantly different by Fisher’s tests at p ≤ 0.005; mean values within different columns designated by the same letters are not significantly different by Fisher’s tests at p ≤ 0.005.