Literature DB >> 29986250

Freshwater plastic pollution: Recognizing research biases and identifying knowledge gaps.

Martín C M Blettler1, Elie Abrial2, Farhan R Khan3, Nuket Sivri4, Luis A Espinola2.   

Abstract

The overwhelming majority of research conducted to date on plastic pollution (all size fractions) has focused on marine ecosystems. In comparison, only a few studies provide evidence for the presence of plastic debris in freshwater environments. However, owing to the numerous differences between freshwater studies (including studied species and habitats, geographical locations, social and economic contexts, the type of data obtained and also the broad range of purposes), they show only fragments of the overall picture of freshwater plastic pollution. This highlights the lack of a holistic vision and evidences several knowledge gaps and data biases. Through a bibliometric analysis we identified such knowledge gaps, inconsistencies and survey trends of plastic pollution research within freshwater ecosystems. We conclude that there is a continued need to increase the field-data bases about plastics (all size fractions) in freshwater environments. This is particularly important to estimate river plastic emissions to the world's oceans. Accordingly, data about macroplastics from most polluted and larger rivers are very scarce, although macroplastics represent a huge input in terms of plastics weight. In addition, submerged macroplastics may play an important role in transporting mismanaged plastic waste, however almost no studies exist. Although many of the most plastic polluted rivers are in Asia, only 14% of the reviewed studies were carried out in this continent (even though the major inland fisheries of the world are located in Asia's rivers). The potential damage caused by macroplastics on a wide range of freshwater fauna is as yet undetermined, even though negative impacts have been well documented in similar marine species. We also noted a clear supremacy of microplastic studies over macroplastic ones, even though there is no reason to assume that freshwater ecosystems remain unaffected by macro-debris. Finally, we recommend focusing monitoring efforts in most polluted rivers worldwide, but particularly in countries with rapid economic development and poor waste management.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developing country; Endangered fauna; Freshwater environment; Macroplastic; Plastic pollution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29986250     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  26 in total

1.  Microplastics in municipal wastewater treatment plants in Turkey: a comparison of the influent and secondary effluent concentrations.

Authors:  Sedat Gündoğdu; Cem Çevik; Evşen Güzel; Serdar Kilercioğlu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Optimising sample preparation for FTIR-based microplastic analysis in wastewater and sludge samples: multiple digestions.

Authors:  Serena Cunsolo; John Williams; Michelle Hale; Daniel S Read; Fay Couceiro
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 3.  Plastic pollution: A focus on freshwater biodiversity.

Authors:  Valter M Azevedo-Santos; Marcelo F G Brito; Pedro S Manoel; Júlia F Perroca; Jorge Luiz Rodrigues-Filho; Lucas R P Paschoal; Geslaine R L Gonçalves; Milena R Wolf; Martín C M Blettler; Marcelo C Andrade; André B Nobile; Felipe P Lima; Ana M C Ruocco; Carolina V Silva; Gilmar Perbiche-Neves; Jorge L Portinho; Tommaso Giarrizzo; Marlene S Arcifa; Fernando M Pelicice
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 6.943

4.  The General Growth Tendency: A tool to improve publication trend reporting by removing record inflation bias and enabling quantitative trend analysis.

Authors:  Joost L D Nelis; Gonçalo Rosas da Silva; Jordi Ortuño; Aristeidis S Tsagkaris; Benny Borremans; Jana Haslova; Michelle L Colgrave; Christopher T Elliott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Atmospheric transport is a major pathway of microplastics to remote regions.

Authors:  N Evangeliou; H Grythe; Z Klimont; C Heyes; S Eckhardt; S Lopez-Aparicio; A Stohl
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Transparent and Robust All-Cellulose Nanocomposite Packaging Materials Prepared in a Mixture of Trifluoroacetic Acid and Trifluoroacetic Anhydride.

Authors:  Susana Guzman-Puyol; Luca Ceseracciu; Giacomo Tedeschi; Sergio Marras; Alice Scarpellini; José J Benítez; Athanassia Athanassiou; José A Heredia-Guerrero
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.076

7.  Insoluble and Thermostable Polyhydroxyesters From a Renewable Natural Occurring Polyhydroxylated Fatty Acid.

Authors:  José Jesús Benítez; Susana Guzman-Puyol; Miguel Antonio Cruz-Carrillo; Luca Ceseracciu; Ana González Moreno; Antonio Heredia; José Alejandro Heredia-Guerrero
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 8.  Analysis and Prevention of Microplastics Pollution in Water: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Yolanda Picó; Damià Barceló
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-04-12

9.  Seasonality of riverine macroplastic transport.

Authors:  Tim van Emmerik; Emilie Strady; Thuy-Chung Kieu-Le; Luan Nguyen; Nicolas Gratiot
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Toward an ecotoxicological risk assessment of microplastics: Comparison of available hazard and exposure data in freshwaters.

Authors:  Véronique Adam; Tong Yang; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.