Literature DB >> 29986173

The relationship between negative symptoms and cognitive functioning in patients at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Letizia Leanza1, Laura Egloff1, Erich Studerus2, Christina Andreou2, Ulrike Heitz2, Sarah Ittig2, Katharina Beck1, Martina Uttinger2, Anita Riecher-Rössler3.   

Abstract

Negative symptoms and neurocognitive performance have been reported to be negatively associated in patients with emerging psychosis. However, most previous studies focused on patients with frank psychosis and did not differentiate between subdomains of negative symptoms. Hence, we aimed to elucidate the specific relationship between negative symptoms and cognitive functioning in patients at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. Data from 154 CHR patients collected within the prospective Früherkennung von Psychosen (FePsy) study were analyzed. Negative symptoms were assessed with the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and cognitive functioning with an extensive neuropsychological test battery. Regression analyses revealed significant negative associations between negative symptoms and cognitive functioning, particularly in the domains of nonverbal intelligence and verbal fluency. When analyzing each negative symptom domain separately, alogia and asociality/anhedonia were significantly negatively associated with nonverbal intelligence and alogia additionally with verbal fluency. Overall, our results in CHR patients are similar to those reported in patients with frank psychosis. The strong negative association between verbal fluency and negative symptoms may be indicative of an overlap between these constructs. Verbal fluency might have a strong influence on the clinical impression of negative symptoms (particularly alogia) and vice versa.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29986173     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  4 in total

Review 1.  A review of negative symptom assessment strategies in youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Gregory P Strauss; Andrea Pelletier-Baldelli; Katherine Frost Visser; Elaine F Walker; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Associations between symptom and neurocognitive dimensions in clinical high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Ingvild Aase; Johannes H Langeveld; Inge Joa; Jan Olav Johannessen; Ingvild Dalen; Wenche Ten Velden Hegelstad
Journal:  Schizophr Res Cogn       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  Persistent negative symptoms in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis: A longitudinal study.

Authors:  D J Devoe; L Lu; T D Cannon; K S Cadenhead; B A Cornblatt; T H McGlashan; D O Perkins; L J Seidman; M T Tsuang; S W Woods; E F Walker; D H Mathalon; C E Bearden; J Addington
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Self-reported neurocognitive symptoms during COVID-19 lockdown and its associated factors in a sample of psychiatric patients. Results from the BRIS-MHC study.

Authors:  Laura Montejo; Brisa Solé; Norma Verdolini; Anabel Martínez-Arán; Caterina Del Mar Bonnín; Joaquim Radua; Inés Martín-Villalba; Evelin Williams; Clemente García-Rizo; Gisela Mezquida; Miguel Bernardo; Eduard Vieta; Carla Torrent; Silvia Amoretti
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.600

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.