Hermann Blessberger1,2, Daniel Kiblboeck1, Christian Reiter1, Thomas Lambert1, Joerg Kellermair1,2, Pierre Schmit3, Franz Fellner3,4, Michael Lichtenauer5, Alexander Kypta1,5, Clemens Steinwender1,2,5, Juergen Kammler1. 1. Department of Cardiology, Med Campus III, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Medical Faculty of the Johannes Kepler University Linz, Krankenhausstr. 9, Linz, Austria. 2. Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research (ICMR), Medical Faculty of the Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria. 3. Central Radiology Institute, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Medical Faculty of the Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria. 4. Medical Faculty of the Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuernberg, Erlangen, Germany. 5. Department of Internal Medicine II, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Abstract
AIMS: As in vivo real-life data are still scarce, we conducted a study to assess the safety and feasibility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with a leadless pacemaker system. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective non-randomized interventional trial, we enrolled 15 patients with an MRI conditional Micra® leadless pacemaker system to undergo either a 1.5 T or 3.0 T cardiac MRI scan. Clinical adverse events as well as device parameters such as pacing threshold, sensing, impedance, and battery life were assessed at baseline as well as 1 and 3 months after the scan. Device parameter changes between different time points were tested for statistical significance and compared with pre-set cut-off values. Fourteen patients underwent the cardiac MRI scan according to the protocol as well as the scheduled follow-up visits. One participant was excluded from analysis, as the MRI scan was not possible because of severe claustrophobia. Other clinical events did not occur during the scan and the follow-up period. Device parameters stayed stable and changes during the observational period were statistically not significant (changes vs. baseline: pacing threshold: 0.01 ± 0.05 V, P = 0.308, 0.01 ± 0.07 V, P = 0.419, sensing: -0.15 ± 1.11 mV, P = 0.658, -0.19 ± 1.17 mV, P = 0.800, impedance: -7.86 ± 30.7 Ohm, P = 0.447, -7.86 ± 25.77 Ohm, P = 0.183, at 1 and 3 months follow-up, respectively). Parameter changes were not statistically different between patients who underwent imaging at 1.5 T (n = 7) or 3.0 T (n = 7). CONCLUSION: In our set of patients with a Micra® leadless pacemaker, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at either 1.5 T or 3.0 T proved feasible and safe with no relevant changes in device parameters within 3 months of follow-up.
AIMS: As in vivo real-life data are still scarce, we conducted a study to assess the safety and feasibility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with a leadless pacemaker system. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective non-randomized interventional trial, we enrolled 15 patients with an MRI conditional Micra® leadless pacemaker system to undergo either a 1.5 T or 3.0 T cardiac MRI scan. Clinical adverse events as well as device parameters such as pacing threshold, sensing, impedance, and battery life were assessed at baseline as well as 1 and 3 months after the scan. Device parameter changes between different time points were tested for statistical significance and compared with pre-set cut-off values. Fourteen patients underwent the cardiac MRI scan according to the protocol as well as the scheduled follow-up visits. One participant was excluded from analysis, as the MRI scan was not possible because of severe claustrophobia. Other clinical events did not occur during the scan and the follow-up period. Device parameters stayed stable and changes during the observational period were statistically not significant (changes vs. baseline: pacing threshold: 0.01 ± 0.05 V, P = 0.308, 0.01 ± 0.07 V, P = 0.419, sensing: -0.15 ± 1.11 mV, P = 0.658, -0.19 ± 1.17 mV, P = 0.800, impedance: -7.86 ± 30.7 Ohm, P = 0.447, -7.86 ± 25.77 Ohm, P = 0.183, at 1 and 3 months follow-up, respectively). Parameter changes were not statistically different between patients who underwent imaging at 1.5 T (n = 7) or 3.0 T (n = 7). CONCLUSION: In our set of patients with a Micra® leadless pacemaker, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at either 1.5 T or 3.0 T proved feasible and safe with no relevant changes in device parameters within 3 months of follow-up.
Authors: Clemens Steinwender; Hermann Blessberger; Daniel Kiblböck; Karim Saleh; Jürgen Kammler Journal: Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol Date: 2018-11-19
Authors: C Steinwender; P Lercher; C Schukro; H Blessberger; G Prenner; M Andreas; J Kraus; M Ammer; M Stühlinger Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 1.900