| Literature DB >> 29985928 |
Dominik F Vollherbst1,2, Theresa Gockner2,3, Thuy Do2, Kerstin Holzer4, Carolin Mogler5, Paul Flechsig2,6, Alexander Harms4, Christopher L Schlett2, Philippe L Pereira7, Götz M Richter8, Hans U Kauczor2, Christof M Sommer2,8.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The present study compared standard computed tomography (CT) and histopathological findings after endovascular embolization using a prototype of inherently radiopaque 40μm-microspheres with both standard 40μm-microspheres and iodized oil in a porcine liver model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29985928 PMCID: PMC6037373 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198911
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Study groups.
| Study group | Embolic agent | Experimental setting / survival time | Embolic mixture / preparation of the embolic agent | Embolization endpoint | Injected volume of the embolic mixture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IO.a | Iodized oil | Acute setting / 2 hours | Pure | Defined volume of embolic agent | 0.5 mL / |
| IO.sa | Subacute setting / 7 days | Pure | Peripheral stasis with remaining blood flow in the central artery | 1.0 mL / | |
| RMS.a | Radiopaque microspheres | Acute setting / 2 hours | 1 mL embolic agent in suspension with 10 mL 0.9% saline | Defined volume of embolic agent | 5.5 mL / |
| RMS.sa | Subacute setting / 7 days | 1 mL embolic agent in suspension with 2 mL saline and 8 mL iodinated contrast agent | Peripheral stasis with remaining blood flow in the central artery | 5.5 mL / | |
| RMS-HEP.sa | 1 mL embolic agent in suspension with 2 mL 0.9% saline, 8 mL iodinated contrast material and 2000 IU heparin | 8.8 mL / | |||
| SMS.a | Standard microspheres | Acute setting / 2 hours | 1 mL embolic agent in suspension with 10 mL 0.9% saline | Defined volume of embolic agent | 5.5 mL / |
1Lipiodol Ultra-Fluide (Guerbet, Roissy, France)
2Prototype of inherently radiopaque 40μm-microspheres (CeloNova BioSciences, San Antonio, USA / Boston Scientific, Marlborough, USA)
3Embozene 40 microspheres (CeloNova BioSciences, San Antonio, USA / Boston Scientific, Marlborough, USA)
IO.a: Iodized oil, acute setting; IO.sa: Iodized oil, subacute setting, RMS.a: Radiopaque microspheres, acute setting; RMS.sa: Radiopaque microspheres, subacute setting; RMS-HEP.sa: Radiopaque microspheres with addition of heparine, subacute setting, SMS.a: Standard microspheres, acute setting; IU: International Units.
Standard CT findings.
| Study group | Visibility of the embolic agent 2 hours after embo-lization | Arterial enhance-ment 2 hours after embo-lization | Parenchymal enhancement 2 hours after embolization | Visibility of the embolic agent 7 days after embo-lization | Arterial enhancement 7 days after embollization | Parenchymal enhancement 7 days after embolization | Additional findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (2 pigs per group) | (Pig A / Pig B) | (Pig A / Pig B) | (Pig A / Pig B) | (Pig A / Pig B) | (Pig A / Pig B) | (Pig A / Pig B) | |
| Pig A / Pig B | Pig A / Pig B | Pig A / Pig B | Pig A / Pig B | Pig A / Pig B | Pig A / Pig B | Pig A / Pig B | Pig A and Pig B |
| IO.a | yes / yes | yes / yes | yes / yes | - | - | - | - |
| IO.sa | yes / yes | yes / yes | yes / yes | yes / yes | yes / yes | yes / yes | |
| RMS.a | yes / yes | yes / no | yes / yes | - | - | - | - |
| RMS.sa | yes / yes | yes / yes | yes / no | yes / yes | yes / yes | yes / no | - |
| RMS-HEP.sa | yes / yes | yes / yes | yes / yes | yes / yes | yes / no | yes / yes | Perivascular and parenchymal hypodensities representing necrosis within the embolized liver segments |
| SMS.a | no / no | no / no | no / no | - | - | - | - |
Note: In all animals, 2 hours after embolization, a slight increase of the density of the liver parenchyma was observed (which can be attributed most likely to iodinated contrast material retention after diagnostic angiography)
1On day 7, the arterial and parenchymal enhancement was less intense for all study groups compared to the 2 hours follow-up
2Enhancement was more intense for iodized oil (IO.a and IO.sa) than for radiopaque microspheres (RMS.a and RMS.sa)
3The addition of heparin to the embolic suspension led to a more intense arterial enhancement (RMS-HEP.sa versus RMS.sa).
Fig 1Iodized oil–standard CT findings.
A IO.a. Non-enhanced CT 2 hours after embolization with 0.5 mL iodized oil. Linear hyperdensities (blue asterisk) corresponding to an occluded subsegmental artery (arterial enhancement) and patchy hyperdensities (red asterisk) corresponding to occluded interlobular arteries and sinusoids (parenchymal enhancement). B IO.sa. Non-enhanced CT 2 hours after embolization. Note the lower arterial (blue asterisk) and parenchymal (red asterisk) enhancement compared to A. C IO.sa. Non-enhanced CT 7 days after embolization. Note the less intense arterial (blue asterisk) and parenchymal (red asterisk) enhancement compared to B.
Fig 2Radiopaque microspheres–standard CT findings.
A RMS.a. Non-enhanced CT 2 hours after embolization. Marked linear hyperdensity (blue asterisk) corresponding to an occluded subsegmental artery (arterial enhancement). The type of arterial enhancement was comparable to iodized oil. B RMS.sa. Non-enhanced CT 2 hours after embolization. Linear (blue asterisk) and patchy hyperdensities (red asterisk) corresponding to occluded subsegmental and interlobular arteries and sinusoids (arterial and parenchymal enhancement). Note the more intense arterial and parenchymal enhancement compared to A. The type of arterial and parenchymal enhancement was comparable with iodized oil. C RMS-HEP.sa. Non-enhanced CT 2 hours after embolization. Note the more intense arterial (blue asterisk) and parenchymal enhancement (red asterisk) than A and B. D RMS-HEP.sa. Non-enhanced CT 7 days after embolization. Note the weaker arterial (blue asterisk) and parenchymal (red asterisk) enhancement compared to C. Note the hypodense areas in the embolized liver parenchyma (blue arrowhead) representing tissue necrosis.
Fig 3Standard microspheres–standard CT findings.
SMS.a. Non-enhanced CT 2 hours after embolization. In contrast to the other study groups, there was neither arterial nor parenchymal enhancement.
Histopathological findings.
| Study groups | Vascular distribution of the embolic agent | Signs of inflammation | Tissue necrosis | Blood retention within the sinusoids |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IO.a | Periportal and sinusoidal distribution | No | No | Mild |
| IO.sa | Moderate leukocyte infiltration of the lobules and multiple leukocytes (lymphocytes, plasma cells and a few eosinophilic granulocytes) within the periportal fields indicating moderate to severe parenchymal and periportal inflammation | |||
| RMS.a | Numerous microspheres in subsegmental and interlobular arteries; only a few microspheres inside interlobular arteries and sinusoids | No | Mild to moderate | |
| RMS.sa | Few leukocytes within the lobules, some leukocytes (lymphocytes, plasma cells and a few eosinophilic granulocytes) within the periportal fields indicating mild parenchymal and periportal inflammation | Focal areas of parenchymal necrosis with vital periportal fields | ||
| RMS-HEP.sa | Large areas of severe confluent parenchymal necrosis with a hemorrhagic rim and necrosis of the periportal fields | |||
| SMS.a | No | No |
1No qualitative difference in vascular distribution between SMS and RMS for the acute setting
2No qualitative difference in inflammation between RMS and RMS-HEP for the subacute setting.
Fig 4Iodized oil–histopathological findings.
A IO.a. MG staining. Preparation artefacts due to degreasing of iodized oil during routine histopathological work-up appear as oval cavities within the sinusoids (black asterisk). Note the integrity of the liver lobule and periportal field (white arrowhead). B IO.sa. Sudan III staining. Iodized oil in interlobular arteries (white arrowheads). C IO.sa. HE staining. Infiltration of the periportal fields by lymphocytes, plasma cells and eosinophilic granulocytes (white arrowhead). Note the absence of parenchymal necrosis.
Fig 6Standard microspheres–histopathological findings.
SMS.a. HE staining. Microspheres in the interlobular arteries (black asterisk). Note the blood retention within the sinusoids (white arrowheads), which is a potential sign of embolization-related reactive hyperemia. There were no qualitative differences regarding the histopathological findings between the standard and the radiopaque microspheres for the acute setting.