Soraya C M Leal-Bertioli1, Ignácio J Godoy2, João F Santos2, Jeff J Doyle3, Patrícia M Guimarães4, Brian L Abernathy1, Scott A Jackson1, Márcio C Moretzsohn4, David J Bertioli1. 1. University of Georgia, Center for Applied Genetic Technologies, 111 Riverbend Road, Athens, GA, 30602-6810, USA. 2. Campinas Agronomical Institute, Avenida Barão de Itapura, 1.481, Campinas, SP, 13020-902, Brazil. 3. Cornell University, School of Integrative Plant Science, Plant Breeding & Genetics Section, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. 4. Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB, W5 Norte Final, Brasília, DF, 70770-917, Brazil.
Abstract
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The genetic bottleneck of polyploid formation can be mitigated by multiple origins, gene flow, and recombination among different lineages. In crop plants with limited origins, efforts to increase genetic diversity have limitations. Here we used lineage recombination to increase genetic diversity in peanut, an allotetraploid likely of single origin, by crossing with a novel allopolyploid genotype and selecting improved lines. METHODS: Single backcross progeny from cultivated peanut × wild species-derived allotetraploid cross were studied over successive generations. Using genetic assumptions that encompass segmental allotetraploidy, we used single nucleotide polymorphisms and whole-genome sequence data to infer genome structures. KEY RESULTS: Selected lines, despite a high proportion of wild alleles, are agronomically adapted, productive, and with improved disease resistances. Wild alleles mostly substituted homologous segments of the peanut genome. Regions of dispersed wild alleles, characteristic of gene conversion, also occurred. However, wild chromosome segments sometimes replaced cultivated peanut's homeologous subgenome; A. ipaënsis B sometimes replaced A. hypogaea A subgenome (~0.6%), and A. duranensis replaced A. hypogaea B subgenome segments (~2%). Furthermore, some subgenome regions historically lost in cultivated peanut were "recovered" by wild chromosome segments (effectively reversing the "polyploid ratchet"). These processes resulted in lines with new genome structure variations. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic diversity was introduced by wild allele introgression, and by introducing new genome structure variations. These results highlight the special possibilities of segmental allotetraploidy and of using lineage recombination to increase genetic diversity in peanut, likely mirroring what occurs in natural segmental allopolyploids with multiple origins.
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The genetic bottleneck of polyploid formation can be mitigated by multiple origins, gene flow, and recombination among different lineages. In crop plants with limited origins, efforts to increase genetic diversity have limitations. Here we used lineage recombination to increase genetic diversity in peanut, an allotetraploid likely of single origin, by crossing with a novel allopolyploid genotype and selecting improved lines. METHODS: Single backcross progeny from cultivated peanut × wild species-derived allotetraploid cross were studied over successive generations. Using genetic assumptions that encompass segmental allotetraploidy, we used single nucleotide polymorphisms and whole-genome sequence data to infer genome structures. KEY RESULTS: Selected lines, despite a high proportion of wild alleles, are agronomically adapted, productive, and with improved disease resistances. Wild alleles mostly substituted homologous segments of the peanut genome. Regions of dispersed wild alleles, characteristic of gene conversion, also occurred. However, wild chromosome segments sometimes replaced cultivated peanut's homeologous subgenome; A. ipaënsis B sometimes replaced A. hypogaea A subgenome (~0.6%), and A. duranensis replaced A. hypogaea B subgenome segments (~2%). Furthermore, some subgenome regions historically lost in cultivated peanut were "recovered" by wild chromosome segments (effectively reversing the "polyploid ratchet"). These processes resulted in lines with new genome structure variations. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic diversity was introduced by wild allele introgression, and by introducing new genome structure variations. These results highlight the special possibilities of segmental allotetraploidy and of using lineage recombination to increase genetic diversity in peanut, likely mirroring what occurs in natural segmental allopolyploids with multiple origins.
Authors: Lee T Hickey; Amber N Hafeez; Hannah Robinson; Scott A Jackson; Soraya C M Leal-Bertioli; Mark Tester; Caixia Gao; Ian D Godwin; Ben J Hayes; Brande B H Wulff Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Marina Bressano; Alicia N Massa; Renee S Arias; Francisco de Blas; Claudio Oddino; Paola C Faustinelli; Sara Soave; Juan H Soave; Maria A Pérez; Victor S Sobolev; Marshall C Lamb; Monica Balzarini; Mario I Buteler; J Guillermo Seijo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: David J Bertioli; Josh Clevenger; Ignacio J Godoy; H T Stalker; Shona Wood; Joáo F Santos; Carolina Ballén-Taborda; Brian Abernathy; Vania Azevedo; Jacqueline Campbell; Carolina Chavarro; Ye Chu; Andrew D Farmer; Daniel Fonceka; Dongying Gao; Jane Grimwood; Neil Halpin; Walid Korani; Marcos D Michelotto; Peggy Ozias-Akins; Justin Vaughn; Ramey Youngblood; Marcio C Moretzsohn; Graeme C Wright; Scott A Jackson; Steven B Cannon; Brian E Scheffler; Soraya C M Leal-Bertioli Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-09-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Joel Sharbrough; Justin L Conover; Matheus Fernandes Gyorfy; Corrinne E Grover; Emma R Miller; Jonathan F Wendel; Daniel B Sloan Journal: Mol Biol Evol Date: 2022-04-10 Impact factor: 8.800
Authors: Ye Chu; David Bertioli; Chandler M Levinson; H Thomas Stalker; C Corley Holbrook; Peggy Ozias-Akins Journal: G3 (Bethesda) Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 3.154