B Üreyen Kaya1, C E Erik1, E Sesli Çetin2, M Köle2, M Maden1. 1. Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey. 2. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the bacterial reduction achieved by WaveOne Gold (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Hyflex EDM (Coltene-Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland), and XP-endo Shaper (FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) in canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. The null hypothesis (H0 ) was that there would be no difference amongst the NiTi systems in reducing the root canal bacterial load. METHODOLOGY: Seventy-four mandibular premolar teeth with straight and round root canals were selected. Sixty-two root canals were contaminated with E. faecalis for 4 weeks and subjected to mechanical preparation with one of three single-file NiTi rotary systems (WaveOne Gold, Hyflex EDM, and XP Endo Shaper). Twelve non-contaminated root canals were used as negative controls. Bacterial samples were collected with sterile paper points (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics) before and after rotary instrumentation to quantify the bacterial load. Five roots from each instrumentation group were evaluated topographically from the coronal, middle and apical thirds by SEM. The bacterial reduction was calculated and analysed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post hoc tests, all at 5% significance. RESULTS: The samples taken before instrumentation showed approximately 9.64 log CFU bacterial load. Instrumentation with the Hyflex EDM and XP-endo Shaper resulted in significantly greater bacterial reduction than those with WaveOne Gold (P = 0.00). All specimens had bacterial growth. SEM images supported the CFU/mL data. Thick and dense debris was observed in WaveOne Gold samples. Instrumentation resulted in the disruption of the biofilm-like structure, and both areas of clean and open dentinal tubules and areas with thick debris were observed in Hyflex EDM and XP-endo Shaper samples. CONCLUSIONS: Instrumentation in straight and round canals of premolar teeth with the Hyflex EDM and XP-endo Shaper resulted in significantly greater bacterial reduction than WaveOne Gold. No instrumentation system rendered root canals completely free from bacteria.
AIM: To evaluate the bacterial reduction achieved by WaveOne Gold (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Hyflex EDM (Coltene-Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland), and XP-endo Shaper (FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) in canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. The null hypothesis (H0 ) was that there would be no difference amongst the NiTi systems in reducing the root canal bacterial load. METHODOLOGY: Seventy-four mandibular premolar teeth with straight and round root canals were selected. Sixty-two root canals were contaminated with E. faecalis for 4 weeks and subjected to mechanical preparation with one of three single-file NiTi rotary systems (WaveOne Gold, Hyflex EDM, and XP Endo Shaper). Twelve non-contaminated root canals were used as negative controls. Bacterial samples were collected with sterile paper points (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics) before and after rotary instrumentation to quantify the bacterial load. Five roots from each instrumentation group were evaluated topographically from the coronal, middle and apical thirds by SEM. The bacterial reduction was calculated and analysed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post hoc tests, all at 5% significance. RESULTS: The samples taken before instrumentation showed approximately 9.64 log CFU bacterial load. Instrumentation with the Hyflex EDM and XP-endo Shaper resulted in significantly greater bacterial reduction than those with WaveOne Gold (P = 0.00). All specimens had bacterial growth. SEM images supported the CFU/mL data. Thick and dense debris was observed in WaveOne Gold samples. Instrumentation resulted in the disruption of the biofilm-like structure, and both areas of clean and open dentinal tubules and areas with thick debris were observed in Hyflex EDM and XP-endo Shaper samples. CONCLUSIONS: Instrumentation in straight and round canals of premolar teeth with the Hyflex EDM and XP-endo Shaper resulted in significantly greater bacterial reduction than WaveOne Gold. No instrumentation system rendered root canals completely free from bacteria.