Literature DB >> 29984513

Medical Oncology Group of Australia position statement and membership survey on voluntary assisted dying.

Christos S Karapetis1,2, Brian Stein3,4, Bogda Koczwara1, Rosemary Harrup5, Linda Milleshkin6, Phil Parente7,8, Michael Millward9,10, Ian Haines8,11, Prunella Blinman12,13, Ian Olver14.   

Abstract

The controversial topic of voluntary assisted dying (VAD) is receiving significant attention at state government levels and in the community. Acknowledging potential legalisation of VAD, the Medical Oncology Group of Australia (MOGA) undertook a survey of members to inform the development of a position statement on the subject. All MOGA members were invited to complete an anonymous online survey. The survey comprised 12 closed-response categorical questions. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the survey data. Majority views expressed in the survey would form the basis of a MOGA position statement on VAD. A total of 362 members completed the questionnaire, representing 55% of the membership; 47% of respondents disagreed with VAD; 36% agreed with VAD and the remaining members (17%) were 'neutral'. A clear majority position was not established. Only 14% agreed that physicians involved in VAD should be required personally to administer the lethal medication; 94% supported conscientious objection of physicians to the VAD process; 95% agreed that a palliative care physician consultation should be required and 86% agreed with the need for the involvement of specialist psychiatry medical services before a patient can be deemed as suitable for VAD. The MOGA membership expressed a range of views on the topic of VAD. A clear majority-held view to support a MOGA position that either supports or opposes VAD was not established. The position statement that flows from the survey encourages informed debate on this topic and brings into focus important considerations. The Authors. Internal Medicine Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assisted dying; cancer; end of life; euthanasia; position statement; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29984513     DOI: 10.1111/imj.13951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med J        ISSN: 1444-0903            Impact factor:   2.048


  3 in total

1.  Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation.

Authors:  Rosalind McDougall; Bridget Pratt
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  Voluntary assisted dying: peak bodies must provide practical guidance.

Authors:  Eliana Close; Lindy Willmott; Ben P White
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.611

3.  Introducing Voluntary Assisted Dying: Staff Perspectives in an Acute Hospital.

Authors:  Robin Digby; Rosalind McDougall; Michelle Gold; Danielle Ko; Lisa O'Driscoll; Tracey Bucknall
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2022-06-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.