| Literature DB >> 29984314 |
Robert E Danczak1, Michael D Johnston2, Chris Kenah3, Michael Slattery3, Michael J Wilkins1,2.
Abstract
Microbial ecological processes are frequently studied in the presence of perturbations rather than in undisturbed environments, despite the relatively stable conditions dominating many microbial habitats. To examine processes influencing microbial community structuring in the absence of strong external perturbations, three unperturbed aquifers in Ohio (Greene, Licking, and Athens) were sampled over 2 years and analyzed using geochemical measurements, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and ecological modeling. Redox conditions ranging from highly reducing to more oxidizing distinguished aquifer geochemistry across the three locations. Distinct microbial communities were present in each aquifer, and overall community structure was related to geochemistry, although community composition was more similar between the Athens and Licking locations. The ecological processes acting upon microbial assemblages within aquifers were varied; geochemical changes affected the Athens location, while time or some unknown factor affected Greene County. Stochastic processes, however, dominated the Licking aquifer, suggesting a decoupling between environmental fluctuations and community development. Although physicochemical differences might be expected to drive variable selection, dispersal limitation (inability to mix) explained differences between Athens and Licking. Finally, community complexity as measured by "cohesion" indicated that less-interconnected communities experienced higher turnover and were more likely to be affected by stochastic processes. Conversely, more-interconnected communities experienced lower turnover and susceptibility to homogenizing selection. Based upon these data, we support the hypothesis that unperturbed environments house dynamic microbial communities due to external and internal forces. IMPORTANCE Many microbial ecology studies have examined community structuring processes in dynamic or perturbed situations, while stable environments have been investigated to a lesser extent. Researchers have predicted that environmental communities never truly reach a steady state but rather exist in states of constant flux due to internal, rather than external, dynamics. The research presented here utilized a combined null model approach to examine the deterministic and stochastic processes responsible for observed community differences in unperturbed, groundwater ecosystems. Additionally, internal dynamics were investigated by relating a recently published measure of community complexity (cohesion) to ecological structuring processes. The data presented here suggest that communities that are more cohesive, and therefore more complex, are more likely affected by homogenizing selection, while less-complex communities are more susceptible to dispersal. By understanding the relationship between internal dynamics and community structuring processes, insight about microbial population development in natural systems can be obtained.Entities:
Keywords: aquifers; cohesion; microbial ecology; null modeling
Year: 2018 PMID: 29984314 PMCID: PMC6030547 DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00066-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 6.496
FIG 1 A map of Ohio indicating the three field sites (A) and a PCA of the geochemistry (B). Lighter colors in panel B are geochemical measurements taken before biological samples were collected. Arrows on panel B indicate the loading of various geochemical parameters. The yellow dot represents the location of Columbus, OH, for reference.
Pairwise and overall PERMANOVA statistics for the various beta diversity measurements used in this study
Bray-Curtis is delineated by “Bray,” weighted UniFrac by “wUni,” and unweighted UniFrac by “uwUni.” Values in boldface are F statistics for the specific pairwise PERMANOVA comparisons, while values in italics are the corresponding P values.
FIG 2 (A) Alpha diversity metrics (Shannon’s H′, Pielou’s J, and Faith’s PD). (B and C) Unweighted (B) and weighted (C) UniFrac measurements for each sample. Statistical differences are listed in Table 1.
Definitions of the various terms used throughout this article
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| βNTI | β-Nearest taxon index, which uses phylogenetic information to |
| RCBC | Raup-Crick (Bray-Curtis), which builds null communities |
| Variable selection | The result of communities being more different than would be |
| Homogenizing selection | The result of communities being less different than would be |
| Dispersal limitation | Indicates populations between samples are unable to interact, |
| Homogenizing dispersal | Indicates populations between samples are freely able to interact, |
| Ecological drift | Occurs when communities are as different as random chance |
| Undominated | Indicates no single ecological process is capable of explaining |
| Cohesion | A metric that measures the complexity/interconnectedness of a |
| Positive cohesion | The cohesion result for those community members that were |
| Negative cohesion | The cohesion result for those community members that were |
| Interconnectedness | A term used to reference the degree of negative cohesion within |
See Zhou and Ning (37) and Herren and McMahon (28) for greater detail.
FIG 3 Heat map representing the βNTI values within and between wells (red and blue; lower triangle) and Raup-Crick (Bray-Curtis) values (purple and green; upper triangle). Gray boxes represent comparisons that had significant βNTI values (e.g., |βNTI| > 2) and therefore do not need Raup-Crick values. The accompanying legends provide the corresponding interpretations for each result.
FIG 4 The cohesion metric for each well. The top panel illustrates the positive cohesion measurement, while the bottom panel illustrates the negative measurement. Potential interpretations of results are illustrated by arrows adjacent to each panel. Two-sided Mann-Whitney U tests indicated that each location was significantly different from the others (Bonferroni corrected P values of <0.01).
FIG 5 Summary figure illustrating our hypotheses. The metacommunity represents the total group of possible organisms that could assemble into our local communities. The black lines illustrate the total “ecological processing” that generates the local communities, with the blue, white, and purple boxes indicating specific ecological filters within a given location. Arrows adjacent to the colored bars represent interactions that enhance specific processes. For example, stable geochemistry enhances homogenizing selection. The red-blue gradient arrow represents a range of redox conditions from reducing to oxidizing. The red and green boxes indicate the measured ecological processes that must occur between the wells to obtain the observed results (dispersal limitation between the Athens and Licking locations and variable selection between the Greene aquifer and the other two locations).