Literature DB >> 29984281

Aggressive squamous cell carcinoma in a patient on the Janus kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib.

Nader Aboul-Fettouh1, Rajiv I Nijhawan1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCC, basal cell carcinoma; JAK, Janus kinase; Janus kinase; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; myelofibrosis; polycythemia vera; ruxolitinib; skin cancer

Year:  2018        PMID: 29984281      PMCID: PMC6031591          DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2018.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAAD Case Rep        ISSN: 2352-5126


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Ruxolitinib, an orally administered inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and 2, which are intracellular nonreceptor tyrosine kinases, is used to treat patients with myelofibrosis and is found to have significant clinical benefits including reductions in splenomegaly and total symptom score. Ruxolitinib is also found to be superior to standard single-agent therapy in controlling hematocrit, reducing the spleen volume, and improving symptoms associated with polycythemia vera. The most common adverse events associated with ruxolitinib is anemia and thrombocytopenia, which rarely lead to drug discontinuation. Of note, 5-year efficacy data on ruxolitinib showed 17.1% of patients on ruxolitinib went on to have basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) or squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) compared with only 2.7% of patients on best-available therapy. Current ruxolitinib prescriber information labels warn of the risk of nonmelanoma skin cancers, and performing periodic skin examinations is recommended. Skin cancers occurring in patients treated with ruxolitinib have been reported in the dermatology literature to display more aggressive biological behavior and metastatic potential.6, 7 We present another case of a patient having aggressive cutaneous malignancy after ruxolitinib initiation and urge physicians to be aware of this associated risk.

Case report

A 70-year-old white woman, who denied a history of extensive sun exposure, had polycythemia vera with JAK-2+ myelofibrosis about 15 years before presentation. She was initially treated with phlebotomy for 6 years, followed by hydroxyurea for 5 years. Eleven years after diagnosis, ruxolitinib was initiated at 10 mg twice daily for about 2 years, at which point the dose was slowly tapered down over 3 years to 10 mg once daily. The patient reported a history of actinic keratosis 20 years prior along with one BCC on the nose diagnosed and treated 5 years before the myelofibrosis diagnosis. After one year of ruxolitinib therapy, the patient reported “dozens” of SCCs, all of which had been treated by a dermatologist before the patient relocated to Texas. About 3 years after initiation of ruxolitinib, the patient's BCC on her nose recurred and was treated by radiation therapy. Five years after initiation of ruxolitinib, the patient presented to our clinic with a few-month history of a 0.7- x 1.0-cm lesion on the right lower vermilion border (Fig 1). The lesion proved to be an aggressive squamous cell carcinoma with moderate to poor differentiation extending into the muscularis with extensive nerve twig perineural invasion (<0.1 mm in nerve caliber) that required 4 stages of Mohs micrographic surgery for tumor clearance revealing a defect measuring 2 × 3.5 cm (Fig 2) and repaired with a wedge repair (Fig 3, A and B). Head and neck imaging found no evidence of lymph node involvement, and the patient declined adjuvant radiation. Over the subsequent 3 months, the patient had 4 additional SCCs treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.
Fig 1

Clinical lesion 0.7 × 1.0 cm.

Fig 2

Intraoperative photo of Mohs section. Moderate to poorly differentiated SCC into muscularis, perineural invasion (<0.1 mm) requiring 4 stages of Mohs micrographic surgery for clearance results in defect measuring 2 × 3.5 cm.

Fig 3

A, Wedge repair. B, Well-healed scar 3 months postoperatively.

Clinical lesion 0.7 × 1.0 cm. Intraoperative photo of Mohs section. Moderate to poorly differentiated SCC into muscularis, perineural invasion (<0.1 mm) requiring 4 stages of Mohs micrographic surgery for clearance results in defect measuring 2 × 3.5 cm. A, Wedge repair. B, Well-healed scar 3 months postoperatively.

Discussion

Development of cutaneous malignancy in patients treated with immunosuppressive agents is well reported. Although this patient was on hydroxyurea for several years, the patient only had a history of precancerous lesions and BCC before initiation of ruxolitinib. The JAK/STAT molecular pathway is involved in the signaling of various cytokines, which are important for regulating inflammatory and immune responses. With new reports of aggressive skin cancers developing in patients on ruxolitinib therapy,6, 7 appropriate surveillance of cutaneous malignancies is warranted in these patients. Current prescribing information for ruxolitinib recommends routine skin examination. Typically, patients with a history of nonmelanoma skin cancers are recommended to have full body skin checks at least every 6 months for the first few years and annually afterwards if there is no evidence of additional skin cancers. Patients on immunosuppressive agents are also typically followed up every 3 to 12 months given their higher risk for skin cancer. Although further research is needed on the role of ruxolitinib and other JAK kinase inhibitors in the development of cutaneous malignancies, patients on these medications, especially those with a history of skin cancer, should have comprehensive routine skin examinations. In addition, dermatologists should be aware the association of ruxolitinib with aggressive nonmelanoma skin cancers and anticipate the potential for extensive subclinical tumor extension.
  8 in total

Review 1.  A new modality for immunosuppression: targeting the JAK/STAT pathway.

Authors:  John J O'Shea; Marko Pesu; Dominic C Borie; Paul S Changelian
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Iatrogenic immunosuppression and cutaneous malignancy.

Authors:  Jennifer L DePry; Kurtis B Reed; Robert H Cook-Norris; Jerry D Brewer
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.541

3.  Eruptive squamous cell carcinomas with keratoacanthoma-like features in a patient treated with ruxolitinib.

Authors:  A Fabiano; P Calzavara-Pinton; P Monari; E Moggio; G Pellacani; A M Manganoni; G Gualdi
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Srdan Verstovsek; Ruben A Mesa; Jason Gotlib; Richard S Levy; Vikas Gupta; John F DiPersio; John V Catalano; Michael Deininger; Carole Miller; Richard T Silver; Moshe Talpaz; Elliott F Winton; Jimmie H Harvey; Murat O Arcasoy; Elizabeth Hexner; Roger M Lyons; Ronald Paquette; Azra Raza; Kris Vaddi; Susan Erickson-Viitanen; Iphigenia L Koumenis; William Sun; Victor Sandor; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Aggressive Skin Cancers Occurring in Patients Treated With the Janus Kinase Inhibitor Ruxolitinib.

Authors:  Adam B Blechman; Christine E Cabell; Christine H Weinberger; Anna Duckworth; Justin J Leitenberger; Fiona O Zwald; Mark A Russell
Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.114

6.  Ruxolitinib versus standard therapy for the treatment of polycythemia vera.

Authors:  Alessandro M Vannucchi; Jean Jacques Kiladjian; Martin Griesshammer; Tamas Masszi; Simon Durrant; Francesco Passamonti; Claire N Harrison; Fabrizio Pane; Pierre Zachee; Ruben Mesa; Shui He; Mark M Jones; William Garrett; Jingjin Li; Ulrich Pirron; Dany Habr; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Ruxolitinib: a review of its use in patients with myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Long-term findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study of ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  C N Harrison; A M Vannucchi; J-J Kiladjian; H K Al-Ali; H Gisslinger; L Knoops; F Cervantes; M M Jones; K Sun; M McQuitty; V Stalbovskaya; P Gopalakrishna; T Barbui
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 11.528

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Hyperkeratotic Skin Adverse Events Induced by Anticancer Treatments: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Maria Vastarella; Gabriella Fabbrocini; Vincent Sibaud
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Janus Kinase Inhibitors and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte S Greif; Divya Srivastava; Rajiv I Nijhawan
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-01-09

3.  A case of aggressive squamous cell carcinoma with lymphovascular invasion during treatment with the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib.

Authors:  Ahmad I Aleisa; John G Plante; Ling-Lun B Hsia
Journal:  JAAD Case Rep       Date:  2020-06-16

Review 4.  Cutaneous toxicities from targeted therapies used in oncology: Literature review of clinical presentation and management.

Authors:  Solène Huynh Dagher; Astrid Blom; Hedi Chabanol; Elisa Funck-Brentano
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2021-09-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.