| Literature DB >> 29984175 |
Jeongyun Lee1, Mi Hong Yim1, Jong Yeol Kim1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Sasang constitutional analysis tool (SCAT) is an integrated Sasang constitutional analysis system developed by the Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of a questionnaire for measuring personality and pathophysiological symptoms that is one of the components of the SCAT.Entities:
Keywords: Questionnaire; Sasang constitutional analysis tool (SCAT); Test-retest reliability; University students
Year: 2018 PMID: 29984175 PMCID: PMC6026350 DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2018.02.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Med Res ISSN: 2213-4220
General characteristics of the participants
| Male | Female | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number (%) | 102 (58%) | 74 (42%) | 176 (100%) |
| Age | 25.40 ± 4.31 | 24.19 ± 2.49 | 24.89 ± 3.70 |
| Height | 175.02 ± 4.82 | 161.75 ± 4.18 | 169.44 ± 7.99 |
| Weight | 70.47 ± 10.02 | 53.26 ± 7.49 | 63.24 ± 12.41 |
| BMI | 23.00 ± 3.12 | 20.34 ± 2.61 | 21.88 ± 3.19 |
Data are expressed as number (%) and as the mean ± standard deviation for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.
Internal consistency reliability of the SCAT questionnaire
| Item | Cronbach's α | Cronbach's α |
|---|---|---|
| Personality | .788 | |
| Q1 | .768 | |
| Q2 | .785 | |
| Q3 | .755 | |
| Q4 | .763 | |
| Q5 | .747 | |
| Q6 | .764 | |
| Q7 | .789 | |
| Q8 | .785 | |
| Q9 | .768 | |
| Q10 | .747 | |
| Q11 | .794 | |
| Q12 | .804 | |
| Pathophysiological symptoms (素證) | ||
| Eating habits | .511 | |
| Q13 | - | |
| Q14 | - | |
| Digestion | .718 | |
| Q15 | .583 | |
| Q16 | .750 | |
| Q17 | .646 | |
| Q18 | .726 | |
| Q19 | .605 | |
| Heat- or cold-wise penchant | .667 | |
| Q27 | .676 | |
| Q28 | .492 | |
| Q29 | .498 | |
| Q30 | .687 | |
| Water ingestion | .612 | |
| Q31 | - | |
| Q32 | - |
Cronbach's α without the insignificant items
Test–retest Reliability of the SCAT Questionnaire
| Item | Spearman rho | |
|---|---|---|
| Personality | ||
| Q1 | 0.589 | |
| Q2 | 0.698 | |
| Q3 | 0.695 | |
| Q4 | 0.614 | |
| Q5 | 0.735 | |
| Q6 | 0.707 | |
| Q7 | 0.651 | |
| Q8 | 0.642 | |
| Q9 | 0.755 | |
| Q10 | 0.649 | |
| Q11 | 0.652 | |
| Q12 | 0.750 | |
| Pathophysiological symptoms (素證) | ||
| Q13 | 0.513 | |
| Q14 | 0.762 | |
| Q15 | 0.642 | |
| Q16 | 0.700 | |
| Q17 | 0.649 | |
| Q18 | 0.577 | |
| Q19 | 0.706 | |
| Q20 | 0.725 | |
| Q21 | 0.742 | |
| Q22 | 0.669 | |
| Q25 | 0.444 | |
| Q27 | 0.784 | |
| Q28 | 0.802 | |
| Q29 | 0.704 | |
| Q30 | 0.707 | |
| Q31 | 0.690 | |
| Q32 | 0.764 |
p < 0.001.