| Literature DB >> 29984171 |
Alexa V Kugler1, Michael Deppe2.
Abstract
Background: Today, no specific test for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is available due to the lack of characteristic symptoms at beginning. This circumstance also complicates estimation of disease progression. Recent findings provided evidence for early, non-lesional cerebellar damage in patients with (clinically definite) relapsing-remitting MS. Objective: To investigate if microstructural cerebellar alterations can also serve as early structural biomarker for disease progression and conversion from clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) to MS.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29984171 PMCID: PMC6031094 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Fig. 1Correlation between cerebellar white matter FA and time between first diagnosis of CIS and diagnosis of (clinically definite) MS (N = 16). The dashed curve represents the 95% confidence bands of the estimated regression function (line). For orientation, the mean cerebellar white matter FA of patients with early relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and the mean of healthy controls (HC) of our previous study are marked (Deppe et al., 2016b).
Contingency table of observed conversion latencies and cerebellar FA-based conversion predictions. The critical FA threshold of FAcrit = 0.352 is the cerebellar mean FA of patients with early RRMS as determined in our previous study (Deppe et al., 2016b). Sensitivity = TP / (TP + FN) = 10/12 = 0.83, Specificity = TN / (TN + FP) = 4/4 = 1.00, χ2 = 8.89, p = 0.0029 (TP = true positive, FN = false negative, FP = false positive, TN = true negative).
| Observation test | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| FA ≤ FAcrit (test positive) | 10 (TP) | 0 (FP) | Positive: 10 |
| FA > FAcrit (test negative) | 2 (FN) | 4 (TN) | Negative: 6 |
| 12 | 4 | 16 |
Fig. 2Cerebellar FA of first DTI (baseline) versus second DTI (six months follow-up) of the 24 patients with CIS at both examinations.
Fig. 3FA difference between first DTI (baseline) and follow-up. Because the interval between first and second MRI was not always exactly 6 months, the FA difference had been linearly adjusted.
Fig. 4Correlation between volume of the 4th ventricle and cerebellar white matter FA change during the 6 months follow-up interval.
Fig. 5Relation between EDSS and relative cerebellar white matter change during the 6 months follow-up interval.