Literature DB >> 29983996

Breast phantom for comparison X-ray and polarimetric optical tomography imaging.

P K Sobotka1, K Chelminski2, W Bulski2, K Kacperski2, J Dziukowa3, E Wesolowska3, S Wieczorek1, S Miernicki1, D Budaszewski1, T R Wolinski1, A W Domanski1.   

Abstract

Breast phantom made as combination of paraffin and INTRALIPID™ was tested by use of X-ray classical computed tomography and polarimetric optical tomography. The INTRALIPID™ is a liquid commonly used for simulation breast tissues optical properties but it is useless as X-ray phantom. During our tests we have observed that X-ray tomography allows to recognize a proper placement of INTRALIPID™ inclusions inside paraffin medium but we cannot distinguish density of INTRALIPID™ within each inclusions. On the other hand the polarimetric optical tomography allows to distinguish density of INTRALIPID™ (0%, 10%, 20%) in inclusions but with relatively low accuracy of their placement.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 29983996      PMCID: PMC6033318          DOI: 10.4302/plp.2012.1.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photonics Lett Pol        ISSN: 2080-2242


  13 in total

1.  Measurement and analysis of light distribution in intralipid-10% at 650 nm.

Authors:  Tang Xu; Chunping Zhang; Xinyu Wang; Lianshun Zhang; Jianguo Tian
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study.

Authors:  S Obenauer; K-P Hermann; E Grabbe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Optical system based on time-gated, intensified charge-coupled device camera for brain imaging studies.

Authors:  Piotr Sawosz; Michal Kacprzak; Norbert Zolek; Wojciech Weigl; Stanislaw Wojtkiewicz; Roman Maniewski; Adam Liebert
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Improved quantification of small objects in near-infrared diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Subhadra Srinivasan; Brian W Pogue; Hamid Dehghani; Shudong Jiang; Xiaomei Song; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Linear image reconstruction for a diffuse optical mammography system in a noncompressed geometry using scattering fluid.

Authors:  Tim Nielsen; Bernhard Brendel; Ronny Ziegler; Michiel van Beek; Falk Uhlemann; Claas Bontus; Thomas Koehler
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  Mueller matrix decomposition for polarized light assessment of biological tissues.

Authors:  Nirmalya Ghosh; Michael F G Wood; Shu-hong Li; Richard D Weisel; Brian C Wilson; Ren-Ke Li; I Alex Vitkin
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.207

7.  Effect of dose reduction on the ability of digital mammography to detect simulated microcalcifications.

Authors:  Mari Yakabe; Shuji Sakai; Hidetake Yabuuchi; Yoshio Matsuo; Takeshi Kamitani; Taro Setoguchi; Mayumi Cho; Masafumi Masuda; Masayuki Sasaki
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  A soft deformable tissue-equivalent phantom for diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Jeremy C Hebden; Ben D Price; Adam P Gibson; Gary Royle
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Gradient-based iterative image reconstruction scheme for time-resolved optical tomography.

Authors:  A H Hielscher; A D Klose; K M Hanson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Breast phantom with silicone implant for evaluation in conventional mammography.

Authors:  Fábio A R Silva; Luíza F Souza; Carlos E G Salmon; Divanizia N Souza
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.