| Literature DB >> 29983983 |
Makoto Hibino1, Kazunari Maeda2, Shigeto Horiuchi1, Minoru Fukuda1, Tetsuri Kondo1.
Abstract
There is a broad differential diagnosis for interstitial shadows on chest computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis patients, especially those previously treated with immunosuppressant drugs. We report an immunocompromised rheumatoid arthritis patient in respiratory failure with diffuse ground-glass opacities (GGOs), who was diagnosed with pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis as the initial presentation of prostate cancer. He was successfully treated with chemohormonal androgen deprivation therapy, including bicalutamide, leuprorelin acetate, denosumab, and docetaxel. Metastatic pulmonary lymphangitis, rarely from the prostate, should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of GGOs, even when the patient has no known prior malignancies.Entities:
Keywords: Ground‐glass opacities; lymphangitic carcinomatosa; metastasis; prostate‐specific antigen; rheumatoid arthritis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29983983 PMCID: PMC6018985 DOI: 10.1002/rcr2.347
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respirol Case Rep ISSN: 2051-3380
Figure 1Axial chest high‐resolution computed tomography at the time of admission demonstrating extensive ground‐glass opacities with emphysematous changes, thickened bronchovascular interstitium, and slight right‐sided pleural effusion (A: At the level of the aortic arch, B: At the level of the right middle lobe branch). A thickened interlobular septum was most obviously present in the right lower lobe (C). Mediastinal lymphadenopathy is also evident (not shown) with no primary lesion in either lung. After four courses of docetaxel, the abnormal shadows, except for emphysematous changes, were almost completely resolved (D–F).
Figure 2(A) Histological image of transbronchial lung biopsy specimen revealing an adenocarcinoma within the small vessels and surrounding tissue (haematoxylin and eosin stain). (B) The lymphatic endothelium is positively stained and surrounds the lymphatic lumen, which is infiltrated by growth of the tumour (immunohistochemical stain using antibodies against the lymphatic endothelium marker D2–40). (C) All tumour cells were immunohistochemically positive for prostate‐specific antigen. Magnification of all microphotographs is ×100.