| Literature DB >> 29983980 |
Sara Hedayati1, Mostafa Mazaheri Tehrani1.
Abstract
The baking industry is interested in finding cost-effective and healthful alternatives for eggs. Therefore, in this study the effects of total replacement of egg by soymilk (SM) in combination with 0-6% soy lecithin (SL) on batter (density, microstructure, viscosity, and texture) and cakes (height, volume, density, texture, color parameters, and sensory attributes) were determined and compared with cakes manufactured with eggs. The results showed that all batters had shear thinning behavior and provided a good fit for the power law model. The egg-free cake in the absence of SL was downgraded because of high density and viscosity, small air bubbles, dark color, firm texture, low volume, and sensory scores. Inclusion of up to 4% SL to the SM was found to be significant in improving cake quality and led to cakes more similar to the control sample; however, higher levels of SL had negative effects on organoleptic properties of cakes.Entities:
Keywords: cake; egg; lecithin; physical properties; soymilk
Year: 2018 PMID: 29983980 PMCID: PMC6021699 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.656
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Influence of egg substitution on physical properties of batter and cake
| Treatment | Batter density (g/cm3) | Cake density (g/cm3) | Cake height (cm) | Cake volume (cm3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1.028 ± 0.008d | 0.333 ± 0.009d | 4.65 ± 0.25a | 249.37 ± 4.09a |
| SM + 0% SL | 1.104 ± 0.013a | 0.426 ± 0.013a | 2.80 ± 0.12e | 194.67 ± 2.89d |
| SM + 1% SL | 1.093 ± 0.008a | 0.403 ± 0.012b | 2.99 ± 0.13d | 206.00 ± 2.65c |
| SM + 2% SL | 1.073 ± 0.012b | 0.395 ± 0.015b | 3.03 ± 0.12d | 210.33 ± 3.51c |
| SM + 3% SL | 1.059 ± 0.010bc | 0.355 ± 0.012c | 3.46 ± 0.04c | 233.33 ± 3.54b |
| SM + 4% SL | 1.044 ± 0.011 cd | 0.327 ± 0.005d | 4.46 ± 0.06b | 247.33 ± 3.05a |
| SM + 5% SL | 1.033 ± 0.006d | 0.323 ± 0.007d | 4.56 ± 0.05ab | 251.67 ± 3.78a |
| SM + 6% SL | 1.035 ± 0.007d | 0.324 ± 0.010d | 4.59 ± 0.06ab | 250.33 ± 2.06a |
Mean values ± standard deviation; values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different (p < .05).
Figure 1Images of cake batters structure: Control (a), SM + 0% SL (b), SM + 2% SL (c), SM + 4% SL (d), SM + 6% SL (e) . Bars on the micrographs=30 μm.
Figure 2Effects of egg replacement and lecithin level on apparent viscosity of cake batter
Influence of egg substitution on rheological properties of batter
| Treatment |
| K (Pa.sn) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.450 ± 0.006a | 32.160 ± 0.707e | .979 |
| SM + 0% SL | 0.401 ± 0.030c | 63.655 ± 1.200a | .953 |
| SM + 2% SL | 0.355 ± 0.063d | 59.360 ± 0.930b | .982 |
| SM + 4% SL | 0.419 ± 0.052b | 51.690 ± 0.649c | .995 |
| SM + 6% SL | 0.453 ± 0.005a | 47.620 ± 4.13d | .994 |
Mean values ± standard deviation; values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different (p < .05).
Influence of egg substitution on textural parameters of cake batter and cake
| Treatment | Textural parameters of cake crumb | Textural parameters of batter | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness (g) | Cohesiveness | Springiness | Chewiness (g) | Firmness (g) | Consistency (g.s) | Cohesiveness (g) | index of viscosity (g.s) | |
| Control | 242 ± 17.09e | 441 ± 21.60f | 412 ± 13.75f | 294 ± 8.08f | 359 ± 10.50 g | 0.723 ± 0.007a | 0.915 ± 0.002a | 237 ± 5.14ef |
| SM + 0% SL | 502 ± 28.62a | 1227 ± 19.47a | 962 ± 12.50a | 592 ± 13.11a | 604 ± 14.42a | 0.597 ± 0.005b | 0.845 ± 0.006e | 304 ± 5.83a |
| SM + 1% SL | 483 ± 20.81a | 1209 ± 10.54a | 914 ± 15.13b | 542 ± 22.01b | 564 ± 12.28b | 0.589 ± 0.010b | 0.853 ± 0.004d | 283 ± 4.17b |
| SM + 2% SL | 419 ± 18.00b | 1078 ± 14.29b | 890 ± 9.54b | 473 ± 15.57c | 522 ± 11.02c | 0.602 ± 0.009b | 0.858 ± 0.006d | 269 ± 3.16c |
| SM + 3% SL | 376 ± 22.37c | 900 ± 11.50c | 807 ± 19.56c | 418 ± 14.11d | 462 ± 17.21d | 0.600 ± 0.017b | 0.880 ± 0.003c | 244 ± 8.27d |
| SM + 4% SL | 320 ± 19.52d | 807 ± 12.64d | 714 ± 12.77d | 383 ± 11.59e | 421 ± 9.07e | 0.604 ± 0.010b | 0.900 ± 0.005b | 228 ± 9.34e |
| SM + 5% SL | 316 ± 18.17d | 768 ± 28.47e | 661 ± 28.83e | 360 ± 19.14e | 392 ± 5.86f | 0.599 ± 0.010b | 0.902 ± 0.002b | 211 ± 3.97 g |
| SM + 6% SL | 317 ± 20.53d | 761 ± 26.10e | 639 ± 14.05e | 377 ± 16.09e | 397 ± 9.50f | 0.601 ± 0.009b | 0.902 ± 0.003b | 215 ± 4.67 g |
Mean values ± standard deviation; values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different (p < .05).
Influence of egg substitution on color parameters of cake crust and crumb
| Treatment | Crust color | Crumb color | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | a | b | L | a | b | |
| Control | 45.67 ± 1.15a | 23.33 ± 0.58a | 28.00 ± 3.00bc | 68.00 ± 2.00a | −4.67 ± 0.58e | 38.00 ± 2.65b |
| SM + 0% SL | 32.67 ± 2.08c | 9.67 ± 1.15e | 17.67 ± 1.53 g | 65.67 ± 2.50ab | 5.00 ± 1.00bcd | 19.67 ± 1.15e |
| SM + 1% SL | 32.33 ± 1.15c | 10.67 ± 1.53e | 18.67 ± 1.50 fg | 64.67 ± 1.53ab | 3.33 ± 2.65d | 21.67 ± 1.15e |
| SM + 2% SL | 32.33 ± 2.08c | 13.00 ± 1.00d | 21.67 ± 1.53ef | 65.00 ± 2.00ab | 4.33 ± 1.16 cd | 25.00 ± 1.00d |
| SM + 3% SL | 35.33 ± 1.53c | 15.33 ± 1.54c | 24.33 ± 1.53de | 64.33 ± 2.10ab | 6.00 ± 1.00abc | 32.67 ± 2.08c |
| SM + 4% SL | 40.33 ± 3.51b | 16.00 ± 1.00c | 26.33 ± 1.15 cd | 62.33 ± 2.08b | 6.00 ± 1.73abc | 40.00 ± 1.00b |
| SM + 5% SL | 42.00 ± 1.00b | 17.00 ± 1.00bc | 30.33 ± 1.53ab | 54.00 ± 2.00c | 7.00 ± 1.00ab | 45.00 ± 1.73a |
| SM + 6% SL | 41.67 ± 0.58b | 18.67 ± 0.58b | 32.33 ± 1.53a | 54.67 ± 1.53c | 7.67 ± 1.15 a | 45.33 ± 2.08a |
Mean values ± standard deviation; values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different (p < .05).
Influence of egg substitution on sensory attributes of cake
| Treatment | Taste | Crust color | Crumb color | Texture | Overall acceptability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 4.30 ± 0.10a | 4.64 ± 0.15a | 4.30 ± 0.10a | 4.7 ± 0.10a | 4.50 ± 0.20a |
| SM +0% SL | 3.84 ± 0.25bc | 3.13 ± 0.41c | 3.90 ± 0.36b | 2.47 ± 0.25e | 2.96 ± 0.15d |
| SM + 1% SL | 4.20 ± 0.30ab | 4.0 ± 0.20b | 4.03 ± 0.25ab | 3.5 ± 0.36d | 4.0 ± 0.15bc |
| SM + 2% SL | 4.27 ± 0.25a | 4.50 ± 0.20a | 4.2 ± 0.10ab | 4.0 ± 0.12c | 4.07 ± 0.21bc |
| SM + 3% SL | 4.33 ± 0.30a | 4.67 ± 0.15a | 4.27 ± 0.15a | 4.1 ± 0.26bc | 4.11 ± 0.10bc |
| SM + 4% SL | 4.30 ± 0.17a | 4.56 ± 0.10a | 4.10 ± 0.10ab | 4.53 ± 0.15a | 4.40 ± 0.20ab |
| SM + 5% SL | 3.66 ± 0.15c | 4.46 ± 0.29a | 3.40 ± 0.10c | 4.47 ± 0.15ab | 3.87 ± 0.32c |
| SM + 6% SL | 2.77 ± 0.25d | 4.63 ± 0.25a | 2.53 ± 0.15d | 4.36 ± 0.15abc | 2.8 ± 0.35d |
Mean values ± standard deviation; values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different (p < .05).