Literature DB >> 29983311

The Role of Association in Pre-schoolers' Solutions to "Spoon Tests" of Future Planning.

Katherine L Dickerson1, James A Ainge1, Amanda M Seed2.   

Abstract

Imagining the future is a powerful tool for making plans and solving problems. It is thought to rely on the episodic system which also underpins remembering a specific past event [1-3]. However, the emergence of episodic future thinking over development and evolution is debated [4-9]. One key source of positive evidence in pre-schoolers and animals is the "spoon test" or item choice test [4, 10], in which participants encounter a problem in one context and then a choice of items in another context, one of which is the solution to the problem. A majority of studies report that most children choose the right item by age 4 [10-15, cf.16]. Apes and corvids have also been shown to pass versions of the test [17-19]. However, it has been suggested that a simpler mechanism could be driving choice: the participant simply chooses the item that has been assigned salience or value, without necessarily imagining the future event [16, 20-23]. We developed a new test in which two of the items offered to children were associated with positive outcomes, but only one was still useful. We found that older children (5-, 6-, and 7-year-olds) chose the correct item at above chance levels, but younger children (3- and 4-year-olds) did not. In further tests, 4-year-olds showed an intact memory for the encoding event. We conclude that positive association substantially impacts performance on item choice tests in 4-year-olds and that future planning may have a more protracted developmental trajectory than episodic memory.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  associative learning; episodic future thinking; foresight; mental time travel; planning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29983311     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  5 in total

1.  Decision-making flexibility in New Caledonian crows, young children and adult humans in a multi-dimensional tool-use task.

Authors:  Rachael Miller; Romana Gruber; Anna Frohnwieser; Martina Schiestl; Sarah A Jelbert; Russell D Gray; Markus Boeckle; Alex H Taylor; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  New Caledonian crows' planning behaviour: a reply to de Mahy et al.

Authors:  M Boeckle; M Schiestl; A Frohnwieser; R Gruber; R Miller; T Suddendorf; R D Gray; A H Taylor; N S Clayton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  A novel test of flexible planning in relation to executive function and language in young children.

Authors:  Rachael Miller; Anna Frohnwieser; Ning Ding; Camille A Troisi; Martina Schiestl; Romana Gruber; Alex H Taylor; Sarah A Jelbert; Markus Boeckle; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 4.  Macphail's Null Hypothesis of Vertebrate Intelligence: Insights From Avian Cognition.

Authors:  Amalia P M Bastos; Alex H Taylor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-08

5.  New Caledonian crows plan for specific future tool use.

Authors:  M Boeckle; M Schiestl; A Frohnwieser; R Gruber; R Miller; T Suddendorf; R D Gray; A H Taylor; N S Clayton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.349

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.