Literature DB >> 29982861

Prognostic importance of the preoperative modified systemic inflammation score for patients with gastric cancer.

Jian-Xian Lin1,2,3, Jun-Peng Lin1,2, Jian-Wei Xie1,2,3, Jia-Bin Wang1,2,3, Jun Lu1,2, Qi-Yue Chen1,2, Long-Long Cao1,2, Mi Lin1,2, Ruhong Tu1,2, Chao-Hui Zheng4,5,6, Chang-Ming Huang7,8,9, Ping Li10,11,12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The systemic inflammation score (SIS), based on preoperative serum albumin (Alb) level and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), has been shown to be a novel prognostic score for some tumors. We investigate the prognostic value of the SIS in patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC).
METHODS: Patients with GC who underwent curative resection between December 2008 and December 2013 were included. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristics analysis (t-ROC), concordance index (C-index) and AUC were used to compare the prognostic impact.
RESULTS: Totally, 1786 patients with resectable GC were included in the study. By multivariate analysis, the SIS was not an independent prognostic factor. However, the normal Alb level (≥ 40 g/l) and LMR ≥ 3.4 both remained independent protective factors for GC (both P < 0.05). Due to the similar survival of patients with LMR ≥ 3.4 and LMR < 3.4 in the normal Alb group, we combined the two subgroups to establish the modified SIS (mSIS). Multivariate analysis revealed that the mSIS was the only significant independent biomarker (P < 0.05). The t-ROC curve and C-index for the mSIS were superior to those of the SIS throughout the observation period. Furthermore, the AUC of the mSIS was significantly greater than that of the SIS at 3 and 5 years after operation (both P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The preoperative mSIS is a novel, simple and useful prognostic factor for postoperative survival in patients with GC and can be used as a part of the preoperative risk stratification process to improve the prediction of clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Albumin; Gastric cancer; Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; Prognosis; Systemic inflammation score

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29982861     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-018-0854-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  22 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of systemic inflammation score in patients who undergo hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Shoichi Inokuchi; Shinji Itoh; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Akinari Morinaga; Takeo Toshima; Kazuki Takeishi; Yoshihiro Nagao; Noboru Harada; Toru Ikegami; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Molecular Typing of Gastric Cancer Based on Invasion-Related Genes and Prognosis-Related Features.

Authors:  Haonan Guo; Hui Tang; Yang Zhao; Qianwen Zhao; Xianliang Hou; Lei Ren
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Peking Prognostic Score, Based on Preoperative Sarcopenia Status, Is a Novel Prognostic Factor in Patients With Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jianping Xiong; Haitao Hu; Wenzhe Kang; Yang Li; Peng Jin; Xinxin Shao; Weikun Li; Yantao Tian
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-06-06

4.  Can preoperative modified systemic inflammation score (mSIS) be used to predict malignancy in persistent nondiagnostic thyroid nodules?

Authors:  Hakan Ataş; Bİrol Korukluoğlu; Bülent Çomçali; Neşe Yakşi; Barış Saylam; Mesut Tez
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 0.973

5.  Dynamic Changes in Pre- and Postoperative Levels of Inflammatory Markers and Their Effects on the Prognosis of Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jian-Xian Lin; Zu-Kai Wang; Ying-Qi Huang; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Ju-Li Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang; Ping Li
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Prognostic Value of an Inflammation-Related Index in 6,865 Chinese Patients With Postoperative Digestive Tract Cancers: The FIESTA Study.

Authors:  Xinran Zhang; Dan Hu; Xiandong Lin; Hejun Zhang; Yan Xia; Jinxiu Lin; Xiongwei Zheng; Feng Peng; Jianzheng Jie; Wenquan Niu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Blood parameters score predicts long-term outcomes in stage II-III gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Jian-Xian Lin; Yi-Hui Tang; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Chang-Ming Huang; Ping Li; Chao-Hui Zheng; Jian-Wei Xie
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Feasibility of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: a case-control study.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Tsuchiya; Chikara Kunisaki; Sho Sato; Yusaku Tanaka; Kei Sato; Jun Watanabe; Kazuhisa Takeda; Takashi Kosaka; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Itaru Endo
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Association of Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio With Survival in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor.

Authors:  Yang Chen; Cheng Zhang; Zhi Peng; Changsong Qi; Jifang Gong; Xiaotian Zhang; Jian Li; Lin Shen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Prognostic role of the pretreatment C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuanxuan Yang; Xing Song; Luo Zhang; Changping Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.