Literature DB >> 29982845

Early treatment response evaluation using FET PET compared to MRI in glioblastoma patients at first progression treated with bevacizumab plus lomustine.

Norbert Galldiks1,2,3, Veronika Dunkl4, Garry Ceccon4, Caroline Tscherpel4,5, Gabriele Stoffels5, Ian Law6, Otto M Henriksen6, Aida Muhic7, Hans S Poulsen7, Jan Steger4, Elena K Bauer4, Philipp Lohmann5, Matthias Schmidt8, Nadim J Shah5,9, Gereon R Fink4,5, Karl-Josef Langen5,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of this prospective study was to compare the value of both conventional MRI and O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET for response evaluation in glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab plus lomustine (BEV/LOM) at first progression.
METHODS: After chemoradiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, 21 IDH wild-type glioblastoma patients at first progression (age range, 33-75 years; MGMT promoter unmethylated, 81%) were treated with BEV/LOM. Contrast-enhanced MRI and FET-PET scans were performed at baseline and after 8-10 weeks. We obtained FET metabolic tumor volumes (MTV) and tumor/brain ratios. Threshold values of FET-PET parameters for treatment response were established by ROC analyses using the post-progression overall survival (OS) ≤/>9 months as the reference. MRI response assessment was based on RANO criteria. The predictive ability of FET-PET thresholds and MRI changes on early response assessment was evaluated subsequently concerning OS using uni- and multivariate survival estimates.
RESULTS: Early treatment response as assessed by RANO criteria was not predictive for an OS>9 months (P = 0.203), whereas relative reductions of all FET-PET parameters significantly predicted an OS>9 months (P < 0.05). The absolute MTV at follow-up enabled the most significant OS prediction (sensitivity, 85%; specificity, 88%; P = 0.001). Patients with an absolute MTV below 5 ml at follow-up survived significantly longer (12 vs. 6 months, P < 0.001), whereas early responders defined by RANO criteria lived only insignificantly longer (9 vs. 6 months; P = 0.072). The absolute MTV at follow-up remained significant in the multivariate survival analysis (P = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: FET-PET appears to be useful for identifying responders to BEV/LOM early after treatment initiation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amino acid PET; CCNU; Glioma; Treatment-related changes; Tumour relapse

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29982845     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4082-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  29 in total

1.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; David A Reardon; Timothy F Cloughesy; A Gregory Sorensen; Evanthia Galanis; John Degroot; Wolfgang Wick; Mark R Gilbert; Andrew B Lassman; Christina Tsien; Tom Mikkelsen; Eric T Wong; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger Stupp; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Martin J van den Bent; Susan M Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas.

Authors:  Dirk Pauleit; Frank Floeth; Kurt Hamacher; Markus J Riemenschneider; Guido Reifenberger; Hans-Wilhelm Müller; Karl Zilles; Heinz H Coenen; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 3.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas.

Authors:  Nathalie L Albert; Michael Weller; Bogdana Suchorska; Norbert Galldiks; Riccardo Soffietti; Michelle M Kim; Christian la Fougère; Whitney Pope; Ian Law; Javier Arbizu; Marc C Chamberlain; Michael Vogelbaum; Ben M Ellingson; Joerg C Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Radiographic patterns of progression with associated outcomes after bevacizumab therapy in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  David Cachia; Nabil A Elshafeey; Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka; Masumeh Hatami; Kristin D Alfaro-Munoz; Jacob J Mandel; Rivka Colen; John F DeGroot
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.

Authors:  D R Macdonald; T L Cascino; S C Schold; J G Cairncross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Advanced MRI and PET imaging for assessment of treatment response in patients with gliomas.

Authors:  Frederic G Dhermain; Peter Hau; Heinrich Lanfermann; Andreas H Jacobs; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 44.182

7.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  James J Vredenburgh; Annick Desjardins; James E Herndon; Jennifer Marcello; David A Reardon; Jennifer A Quinn; Jeremy N Rich; Sith Sathornsumetee; Sridharan Gururangan; John Sampson; Melissa Wagner; Leighann Bailey; Darell D Bigner; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Toxicity and efficacy of lomustine and bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  J N Jakobsen; T Urup; K Grunnet; A Toft; M D Johansen; S H Poulsen; I J Christensen; A Muhic; H S Poulsen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Radiologic progression of glioblastoma under therapy-an exploratory analysis of AVAglio.

Authors:  Martha Nowosielski; Benjamin M Ellingson; Olivier L Chinot; Josep Garcia; Cedric Revil; Alexander Radbruch; Ryo Nishikawa; Warren P Mason; Roger Henriksson; Frank Saran; Philipp Kickingereder; Michael Platten; Thomas Sandmann; Lauren E Abrey; Timothy F Cloughesy; Martin Bendszus; Wolfgang Wick
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 10.  The use of amino acid PET and conventional MRI for monitoring of brain tumor therapy.

Authors:  Norbert Galldiks; Ian Law; Whitney B Pope; Javier Arbizu; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 4.881

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Conventional and advanced imaging throughout the cycle of care of gliomas.

Authors:  Gilles Reuter; Martin Moïse; Wolfgang Roll; Didier Martin; Arnaud Lombard; Félix Scholtes; Walter Stummer; Eric Suero Molina
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Repeatability of image features extracted from FET PET in application to post-surgical glioblastoma assessment.

Authors:  Nathaniel Barry; Pejman Rowshanfarzad; Roslyn J Francis; Anna K Nowak; Martin A Ebert
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-08-26

Review 3.  The Use of 18F-FET-PET-MRI in Neuro-Oncology: The Best of Both Worlds-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Tineke van de Weijer; Martijn P G Broen; Rik P M Moonen; Ann Hoeben; Monique Anten; Koos Hovinga; Inge Compter; Jochem A J van der Pol; Cristina Mitea; Toine M Lodewick; Arnaud Jacquerie; Felix M Mottaghy; Joachim E Wildberger; Alida A Postma
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-11

4.  Redo craniotomy or bevacizumab for symptomatic steroid-refractory true or pseudoprogression following IMRT for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Theresa A Cook; Dasantha T Jayamanne; Helen R Wheeler; Matthew H F Wong; Jonathon F Parkinson; Raymond J Cook; Marina A Kastelan; Nicola J Cove; Christopher Brown; Michael F Back
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2021-06-09

5.  TERT-Promoter Mutational Status in Glioblastoma - Is There an Association With Amino Acid Uptake on Dynamic 18F-FET PET?

Authors:  Marcus Unterrainer; Viktoria Ruf; Katharina von Rohr; Bogdana Suchorska; Lena Maria Mittlmeier; Leonie Beyer; Matthias Brendel; Vera Wenter; Wolfgang G Kunz; Peter Bartenstein; Jochen Herms; Maximilian Niyazi; Jörg C Tonn; Nathalie Lisa Albert
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Hybrid PET-MRI Imaging in Paediatric and TYA Brain Tumours: Clinical Applications and Challenges.

Authors:  Ananth Shankar; Jamshed Bomanji; Harpreet Hyare
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-11-09

7.  PET/MR in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with regorafenib: [18F]FET and DWI-ADC for response assessment and survival prediction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lombardi; Alessandro Spimpolo; Sara Berti; Cristina Campi; Maria Giulia Anglani; Rossella Simeone; Laura Evangelista; Francesco Causin; Giovanni Zorzi; Giancarlo Gorgoni; Mario Caccese; Marta Padovan; Vittorina Zagonel; Diego Cecchin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  High-Grade Glioma Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers: A Position Statement on the Evidence Supporting the Use of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Clinic, and the Latest Bench-to-Bedside Developments. Part 2: Spectroscopy, Chemical Exchange Saturation, Multiparametric Imaging, and Radiomics.

Authors:  Thomas C Booth; Evita C Wiegers; Esther A H Warnert; Kathleen M Schmainda; Frank Riemer; Ruben E Nechifor; Vera C Keil; Gilbert Hangel; Patrícia Figueiredo; Maria Del Mar Álvarez-Torres; Otto M Henriksen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 9.  Current Landscape and Emerging Fields of PET Imaging in Patients with Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Jan-Michael Werner; Philipp Lohmann; Gereon R Fink; Karl-Josef Langen; Norbert Galldiks
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.