Literature DB >> 29982438

Are compound leaves more complex than simple ones? A multi-scale analysis.

Garance Koch1,2, Gaëlle Rolland1, Myriam Dauzat1, Alexis Bédiée1, Valentina Baldazzi2,3,4, Nadia Bertin2, Yann Guédon5, Christine Granier1,5.   

Abstract

Background and Aims: The question of which cellular mechanisms determine the variation in leaf size has been addressed mainly in plants with simple leaves. It is addressed here in tomato taking into consideration the expected complexity added by the several lateral appendages making up the compound leaf, the leaflets.
Methods: Leaf and leaflet areas, epidermal cell number and areas, and endoreduplication (co-) variations were analysed in Solanum lycopersicum considering heteroblastic series in a wild type (Wva106) and an antisense mutant, the Pro35S:Slccs52AAS line, and upon drought treatments. All plants were grown in an automated phenotyping platform, PHENOPSIS, adapted to host plants grown in 7 L pots. Key
Results: Leaf area, leaflet area and cell number increased with leaf rank until reaching a plateau. In contrast, cell area slightly decreased and endoreduplication did not follow any trend. In the transgenic line, leaf area, leaflet areas and cell number of basal leaves were lower than in the wild type, but higher in upper leaves. Reciprocally, cell area was higher in basal leaves and lower in upper leaves. When scaled up at the whole sympodial unit, all these traits did not differ significantly between the transgenic line and the wild type. In response to drought, leaf area was reduced, with a clear dose effect that was also reported for all size-related traits, including endoreduplication. Conclusions: These results provide evidence that all leaflets have the same cellular phenotypes as the leaf they belong to. Consistent with results reported for simple leaves, they show that cell number rather than cell size determines the final leaf areas and that endoreduplication can be uncoupled from leaf and cell sizes. Finally, they re-question a whole-plant control of cell division and expansion in leaves when the Wva106 and the Pro35S:Slccs52AAS lines are compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29982438      PMCID: PMC6324747          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  49 in total

Review 1.  Compound leaves: equal to the sum of their parts?

Authors:  Connie Champagne; Neelima Sinha
Journal:  Development       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit.

Authors:  Christine Granier; Luis Aguirrezabal; Karine Chenu; Sarah Jane Cookson; Myriam Dauzat; Philippe Hamard; Jean-Jacques Thioux; Gaëlle Rolland; Sandrine Bouchier-Combaud; Anne Lebaudy; Bertrand Muller; Thierry Simonneau; François Tardieu
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 3.  Compensation: a key to clarifying the organ-level regulation of lateral organ size in plants.

Authors:  Tetsuya Hisanaga; Kensuke Kawade; Hirokazu Tsukaya
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 6.992

4.  What determines organ size differences between species? A meta-analysis of the cellular basis.

Authors:  Ayelén Gázquez; Gerrit T S Beemster
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 5.  Comparative leaf development in angiosperms.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tsukaya
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 7.834

Review 6.  Morphogenesis of simple leaves: regulation of leaf size and shape.

Authors:  Ramiro E Rodriguez; Juan M Debernardi; Javier F Palatnik
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.814

7.  Cell cycling and cell enlargement in developing leaves of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  P M Donnelly; D Bonetta; H Tsukaya; R E Dengler; N G Dengler
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  The Arabidopsis heterochronic gene ZIPPY is an ARGONAUTE family member.

Authors:  Christine Hunter; Hui Sun; R Scott Poethig
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Systems-based analysis of Arabidopsis leaf growth reveals adaptation to water deficit.

Authors:  Katja Baerenfaller; Catherine Massonnet; Sean Walsh; Sacha Baginsky; Peter Bühlmann; Lars Hennig; Matthias Hirsch-Hoffmann; Katharine A Howell; Sabine Kahlau; Amandine Radziejwoski; Doris Russenberger; Dorothea Rutishauser; Ian Small; Daniel Stekhoven; Ronan Sulpice; Julia Svozil; Nathalie Wuyts; Mark Stitt; Pierre Hilson; Christine Granier; Wilhelm Gruissem
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  Does ploidy level directly control cell size? Counterevidence from Arabidopsis genetics.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tsukaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Leaf Production and Expansion: A Generalized Response to Drought Stresses from Cells to Whole Leaf Biomass-A Case Study in the Tomato Compound Leaf.

Authors:  Garance Koch; Gaëlle Rolland; Myriam Dauzat; Alexis Bédiée; Valentina Baldazzi; Nadia Bertin; Yann Guédon; Christine Granier
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.