Literature DB >> 29982326

Prospective Postimplementation Study of Solana Group A Streptococcal Nucleic Acid Amplification Test vs Conventional Throat Culture.

Sophie Arbefeville1,2, Kari Nelson1, Elizabeth Thonen-Kerr1, Patricia Ferrieri1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the Solana Group A Streptococcus Assay (Quidel, San Diego, CA), a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), as a substitute for backup culture on throat specimens with a negative rapid group A Streptococcus (GAS) antigen assay.
METHODS: During October 2016, all throat swabs from patients with a negative GAS antigen assay from local urgent care centers were processed by NAAT and conventional culture in real time.
RESULTS: The overall agreement of the 2,090 tested throat swab specimens of the NAAT with the culture was 2,050 (98%) of 2,090. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 91.4%, 98.5%, 78.0%, and 99.5%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this postimplementation study supported high sensitivity and specificity of the GAS NAAT as a backup test for negative rapid GAS antigen tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29982326     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  2 in total

1.  Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the Automated Aries Group A Strep PCR Assay from Throat Swabs.

Authors:  N Kanwar; J Crawford; C Ulen; T S Uphoff; J Dien Bard; R Dunn; A Drain; R Selvarangan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Prospective Evaluation of Xpert® Xpress Strep A Automated PCR Assay vs. Solana® Group A Streptococcal Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing vs. Conventional Throat Culture.

Authors:  Patricia Ferrieri; Sophie Arbefeville; Elizabeth Thonen-Kerr; K Nelson
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.188

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.