Literature DB >> 29981866

Comprehensive Validation of Cytology Specimens for Next-Generation Sequencing and Clinical Practice Experience.

Agnes Balla1, Ken J Hampel1, Mukesh K Sharma2, Catherine E Cottrell2, Nikoletta Sidiropoulos3.   

Abstract

Biopsy specimens are subjected to an expanding portfolio of assays that regularly include mutation profiling via next-generation sequencing (NGS). Specimens derived via fine-needle aspiration, a common biopsy technique, are subjected to a variety of cytopreparatory methods compared with surgical biopsies that are almost uniformly processed as formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Therefore, the fine-needle aspiration-derived specimens most commonly accepted for molecular analysis are cell blocks (CBs), because they are processed most similarly to surgical biopsy tissue. However, CB preparations are fraught with challenges that risk unsuccessful sequencing and repeat biopsies, with the potential to further increase health care costs and delay clinical care. The diversity of cytopreparations and the resource-intensive clinical validation of NGS pose significant challenges to more consistent use of non-CB (NCB) cytology specimens. As part of clinical validation of a targeted NGS assay, DNA subjected to nine cytopreparatory methods was evaluated for sequencing performance and was shown to be uniformly acceptable for clinical NGS. Of the 379 clinical cases analyzed after validation, the majority (56%) were derived from NCB cytology specimens. This specimen class had the lowest DNA insufficiency rate (1.5%) and showed equivalent sequencing performance to surgical and CB formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. NCB cytology specimens are valuable sources of tumor nucleic acid and are the preferred specimen type for clinical NGS at our institution.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29981866     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  5 in total

1.  Pathologists at the Leading Edge of Optimizing the Tumor Tissue Journey for Diagnostic Accuracy and Molecular Testing.

Authors:  Luis E De Las Casas; David G Hicks
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Comprehensive validation of liquid-based cytology specimens for next-generation sequencing in cancer genome analysis.

Authors:  Toshiaki Akahane; Tomomi Yamaguchi; Yasutaka Kato; Seiya Yokoyama; Taiji Hamada; Yukari Nishida; Michiyo Higashi; Hiroshi Nishihara; Shinsuke Suzuki; Shinichi Ueno; Akihide Tanimoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Clinical and molecular impacts of tumor mutational burden in histological and cytological specimens from cancer patients.

Authors:  Lin Li; Chuan Chen; Chaojun Liu; Li Niu; Chunguo Pan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-02

4.  The utility of sputum supernatant as an alternative liquid biopsy specimen for next-generation sequencing-based somatic variation profiling.

Authors:  Ling Qin; Ting Guo; Huaping Yang; Pengbo Deng; Qihua Gu; Chi Liu; Mengping Wu; Analyn Lizaso; Bing Li; Sa Zhang; Zhiqiu Chen; Chengping Hu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-04

Review 5.  Next generation sequencing in cytology.

Authors:  Pasquale Pisapia; Francesco Pepe; Roberta Sgariglia; Mariantonia Nacchio; Gianluca Russo; Floriana Conticelli; Ilaria Girolami; Albino Eccher; Claudio Bellevicine; Elena Vigliar; Umberto Malapelle; Giancarlo Troncone
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.073

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.