| Literature DB >> 29981157 |
Thomas C Parker1,2, Jonathan Sanderman3, Robert D Holden4, Gesche Blume-Werry5, Sofie Sjögersten6, David Large7, Miguel Castro-Díaz7, Lorna E Street8, Jens-Arne Subke1, Philip A Wookey1.
Abstract
Decomposition of plant litter is a key control over carbon (C) storage in the soil. The biochemistry of the litter being produced, the environment in which the decomposition is taking place, and the community composition and metabolism of the decomposer organisms exert a combined influence over decomposition rates. As deciduous shrubs and trees are expanding into tundra ecosystems as a result of regional climate warming, this change in vegetation represents a change in litter input to tundra soils and a change in the environment in which litter decomposes. To test the importance of litter biochemistry and environment in determining litter mass loss, we reciprocally transplanted litter between heath (Empetrum nigrum), shrub (Betula nana), and forest (Betula pubescens) at a sub-Arctic treeline in Sweden. As expansion of shrubs and trees promotes deeper snow, we also used a snow fence experiment in a tundra heath environment to understand the importance of snow depth, relative to other factors, in the decomposition of litter. Our results show that B. pubescens and B. nana leaf litter decomposed at faster rates than E. nigrum litter across all environments, while all litter species decomposed at faster rates in the forest and shrub environments than in the tundra heath. The effect of increased snow on decomposition was minimal, leading us to conclude that microbial activity over summer in the productive forest and shrub vegetation is driving increased mass loss compared to the heath. Using B. pubescens and E. nigrum litter, we demonstrate that degradation of carbohydrate-C is a significant driver of mass loss in the forest. This pathway was less prominent in the heath, which is consistent with observations that tundra soils typically have high concentrations of "labile" C. This experiment suggests that further expansion of shrubs and trees may stimulate the loss of undecomposed carbohydrate C in the tundra.Entities:
Keywords: Arctic; decomposition; forest; litter; snow; tundra; vegetation change
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29981157 PMCID: PMC6849570 DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2442
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecology ISSN: 0012-9658 Impact factor: 5.499
Site characteristics along transects at Abisko, Sweden
| Property | Heath | Shrub | Forest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vegetation | |||
| Distance from heath (m) | 28.3 ± 2.9 | 67.6 ± 5.9 | |
| Canopy height (cm) | 14.7 ± 0.7 | 32.0 ± 2.4 | 19.0 ± 1.7 |
|
| 785.0 ± 109.0 | ||
|
| 21.2 ± 2.7 | 60.3 ± 4.8 | 8.0 ± 2.2 |
|
| 65.4 ± 3.3 | 66.9 ± 4.7 | 45.4 ± 4.2 |
| Soil | |||
| pH (organic horizon) | 4.3 ± 0.1 | 4.4 ± 0.1 | 4.5 ± 0.1 |
| Organic horizon carbon (kg/m2) | 7.0 ± 0.8 | 3.0 ± 0.5 | 2.0 ± 0.3 |
| Mineral horizon carbon (kg/m2) | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 3.3 ± 1.3 | 2.5 ± 0.4 |
| 2012–2013 | |||
| Summer temperature (°C) | 5.4 ± 0.3 | 5.1 ± 0.3 | 5.5 ± 0.2 |
| Winter temperature (°C) | −3.9 ± 0.2 | −1.3 ± 0.2 | −1.1 ± 0.2 |
| 2013–2014 | |||
| Summer temperature (°C) | 6.6 ± 0.3 | 6.6 ± 0.6 | 7.1 ± 0.2 |
| Winter temperature (°C) | −2.5 ± 0.5 | −1.0 ± 0.1 | −0.2 ± 0.1 |
| Snow | |||
| 2012–2013 | |||
| Snow depth at transects | 13.1 ± 1.8 | 35.4 ± 4.0 | 46.8 ± 3.4 |
| Snow depth at snow fences (cm) | 13.9 ± 2.2 | 22.6 ± 2.9 | 58.5 ± 13.3 |
| 2013–2014 | |||
| Snow depth at transects | 14.4 ± 3.5 | 29.7 ± 5.3 | 72.2 ± 9.1 |
| Snow depth at snow fences (cm) | 13.0 ± 1.5 | 39.0 ± 8.7 | 78.2 ± 10.4 |
Values are means ± SE, n = 12. “Canopy height” refers to the actual vegetation canopy for heath and shrub communities and the understorey of the forest (where mountain birch trees, Betula pubescens, comprise the canopy). Snow depths measured over transects are paired in either 2013 or 2014 with snow depth data from the snow fence experiment, at plots that were selected to mimic snow depth along the transect. Vegetation and soil data (except temperature data) are adapted from Parker et al. (2015). Soil temperature data are average seasonal temperatures at 5 cm depth across 6 of the 12 transects. The start of each season is defined by soil temperatures deviating and remaining above (summer) or below (winter) 0°C.
Percentage contributions of chemical shift regions to 13C NMR spectra, Alkyl : O‐Alkyl ratios, and C:N ratios of litter samples of Betula pubescens and Empetrum nigrum that were decomposing in forest or heath environments at 0 d (undecomposed), 614 d, and 1,126 d
| Parameter | 0 d | 641 d | 1,126 d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Alkyl (0–45 ppm) | 15.5 ± 0.3 | 20.9 ± 1.2 | 18.5 ± 0.2 | 20.8 ± 1.4 | 25.8 ± 7.3 |
| N‐Alkyl/Methoxyl (45–60 ppm) | 5.1 ± 0.1 | 6.6 ± 0.6 | 6.2 ± 0.1 | 6.6 ± 0.1 | 6.6 ± 0.2 |
| O‐Alkyl (60–95 ppm) | 47.6 ± 0.9 | 38.3 ± 1.6 | 45.7 ± 0.7 | 38.3 ± 1.0 | 40.2 ± 4.8 |
| Di‐O‐Alkyl (95–110 ppm) | 11.3 ± 0.2 | 8.7 ± 0.5 | 10.4 ± 0.1 | 8.7 ± 0.3 | 8.9 ± 1.2 |
| Aryl (110–145 ppm) | 11.1 ± 0.8 | 11.4 ± 0.8 | 9.6 ± 0.3 | 11.3 ± 0.4 | 9.4 ± 0.6 |
| O‐Aryl (145–165 ppm) | 4.2 ± 0.2 | 4.5 ± 0.8 | 3.6 ± 0.3 | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 3.1 ± 0.5 |
| Amide/Carboxyl (165–190 ppm) | 5.1 ± 0.3 | 9.5 ± 1.9 | 6.0 ± 0.4 | 9.7 ± 0.7 | 5.9 ± 1.1 |
| Alkyl/O‐Alkyl | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.8 ± 0.4 |
| C:N | 60.8 ± 4.3 | 31.5 ± 1.9 | 49.7 ± 0.9 | 23.6 ± 1.3 | 31.9 ± 3.2 |
|
| |||||
| Alkyl (0–45 ppm) | 43.9 ± 1.0 | 50.3 ± 1.7 | 51.6 ± 1.3 | 52.3 ± 2.3 | 54.4 ± 0.9 |
| N‐Alkyl/Methoxyl (45–60 ppm) | 4.7 ± 0.2 | 5.0 ± 0.3 | 5.5 ± 0.2 | 6.0 ± 0.1 | 6.0 ± 0.1 |
| O‐Alkyl (60–95 ppm) | 26.9 ± 1.0 | 21.4 ± 1.1 | 24.8 ± 0.6 | 21.3 ± 1.7 | 21.7 ± 0.5 |
| Di‐O‐Alkyl (95–110 ppm) | 6.2 ± 0.1 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 5.0 ± 0.1 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 4.4 ± 0.2 |
| Aryl (110–145 ppm) | 9.9 ± 0.1 | 9.6 ± 0.3 | 7.9 ± 0.4 | 8.7 ± 0.2 | 7.9 ± 0.1 |
| O‐Aryl (145–165 ppm) | 3.9 ± 0.3 | 4.0 ± 0.4 | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 |
| Amide/Carboxyl (165–190 ppm) | 4.4 ± 0.3 | 4.9 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 0.6 | 4.3 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.2 |
| Alkyl/O‐Alkyl | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
| C:N | 138.3 ± 3.0 | 74.6 ± 4.5 | 111.6 ± 5.0 | 50.8 ± 3.9 | 64.3 ± 3.1 |
Values are means ± SE (n = 5 for decomposed field samples, n = 3 for undecomposed samples).
The effect of species of litter and incubation site on decomposition rate (k) on the natural transects (“Site” represents differences both in abiotic factors (e.g., snow cover, thermal and moisture regimes) and biotic factors (e.g., microbial community and others) and at the snow fences (where “Environment” initially represents differences in abiotic factors associated with altered snow only)
| Factor | df |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural transects | |||
| Species | 2,89 | 94.4 | <0.001 |
| Site | 2,89 | 13.3 | <0.001 |
| Snow fence experiment | |||
| Species | 2,36 | 86.9 | <0.001 |
| Snow | 2,36 | 0.2 | 0.9 |
Figure 1Decomposition constants (k) of Empetrum nigrum, Betula nana, and Betula pubescens litter across (a) transects across natural treelines from heath to forest and (b) under three different snow depths simulating snow accumulation found at different vegetation types: Heath (control), + Snow (Shrub) and ++ Snow (Forest). Error bars represent ± SE (transects n = 12, snow fences n = 5).
Figure 2Percentage of litter mass remaining over time for three different species: (a, d) Empetrum nigrum, (b, e) Betula nana, (c, f) Betula pubescens in either distinct vegetation communities (heath, shrub, or forest), distributed across natural transects (a, b, c), or under three different snow depths simulating snow accumulation found at different vegetation types: Heath (control), + Snow (Shrub) and ++ Snow (Forest) (d, e, f). Error bars represent ± SE (transects n = 12, snow fences n = 5). The extent of the shaded areas on the x‐axis indicates the length of the snow covered season in the first two years of the study.
Figure 3Mass of (a) carbohydrates, (b) lipids, and (c) lignin in Betula pubescens (green diamonds) and Empetrum nigrum litter (gray squares) in forest (open shapes) and heath (closed shapes) environments at initial levels (0 d), and after 614 and 1,126 d of decomposition (t5). Error bars represent ± SE (initial litter, n = 3; decomposed samples, n = 5). Boldface lettering in the inset text indicates significant (P < 0.05) factors and interactions in three‐way analysis of variance; number of asterisks indicate level of significance: ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05. See Appendix S1: Table S2 for further statistics relating to these data.