Jasmin Bhawra1, Jessica L Reid1, Christine M White1, Lana Vanderlee2, Kim Raine3, David Hammond4. 1. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada. 2. Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 4. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada. dhammond@uwaterloo.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Many countries, including Canada, are considering nutrition policies that seek to improve dietary behaviour and related health outcomes. The current study examined support for policy measures among youth and young adults in Canada. METHODS: Participants aged 16-30 years were recruited for online surveys using in-person intercept sampling in five Canadian cities as part of the Canada Food Study conducted in October-December, 2016 (n = 2729). Items included support for 21 specific policies in seven key areas: menu labelling, food package symbols and warnings, school policies, taxation and subsidies, zoning restrictions, marketing bans, and food formulation. Linear regression models examined support by age, sex, city, race/ethnicity, parental status, body mass index (BMI), and health literacy. RESULTS: Very high levels of support were observed for menu labelling in restaurants and schools, as well as food package symbols and warnings. Taxation, zoning restrictions (e.g., fast food and convenience stores near schools), and bans on marketing to children received relatively lower levels of support. In general, policy support increased with age for all 21 policies (p < 0.01) and greater health literacy for 4 policies (p < 0.05). Males were less supportive than females for 5 policies (p < 0.01). There were significant differences in support for specific race/ethnicity groups for 4 policies (p < 0.05). Support for menu labelling policies increased with BMI (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Overall, youth and young adults in Canada reported high levels of support for menu labelling, food package symbols/warnings, and school policies. Levels of support were generally consistent across socio-demographic subgroups, with some exceptions.
OBJECTIVES: Many countries, including Canada, are considering nutrition policies that seek to improve dietary behaviour and related health outcomes. The current study examined support for policy measures among youth and young adults in Canada. METHODS:Participants aged 16-30 years were recruited for online surveys using in-person intercept sampling in five Canadian cities as part of the Canada Food Study conducted in October-December, 2016 (n = 2729). Items included support for 21 specific policies in seven key areas: menu labelling, food package symbols and warnings, school policies, taxation and subsidies, zoning restrictions, marketing bans, and food formulation. Linear regression models examined support by age, sex, city, race/ethnicity, parental status, body mass index (BMI), and health literacy. RESULTS: Very high levels of support were observed for menu labelling in restaurants and schools, as well as food package symbols and warnings. Taxation, zoning restrictions (e.g., fast food and convenience stores near schools), and bans on marketing to children received relatively lower levels of support. In general, policy support increased with age for all 21 policies (p < 0.01) and greater health literacy for 4 policies (p < 0.05). Males were less supportive than females for 5 policies (p < 0.01). There were significant differences in support for specific race/ethnicity groups for 4 policies (p < 0.05). Support for menu labelling policies increased with BMI (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Overall, youth and young adults in Canada reported high levels of support for menu labelling, food package symbols/warnings, and school policies. Levels of support were generally consistent across socio-demographic subgroups, with some exceptions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Canada; Nutrition policy; Policy support; Public opinion
Authors: Amanda Raffoul; Brooke Gibbons; Karla Boluk; Elena Neiterman; David Hammond; Sharon I Kirkpatrick Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Clara Gómez-Donoso; Gary Sacks; Lana Vanderlee; David Hammond; Christine M White; Claudia Nieto; Maira Bes-Rastrollo; Adrian J Cameron Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2021-06-14 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Lira Yun; Leigh Vanderloo; Tanya R Berry; Amy E Latimer-Cheung; Norman O'Reilly; Ryan E Rhodes; John C Spence; Mark S Tremblay; Guy Faulkner Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Breanne L Aylward; Krista M Milford; Kate E Storey; Candace I J Nykiforuk; Kim D Raine Journal: Health Promot Int Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 3.734