| Literature DB >> 29980225 |
Ruhui Lin1, Long Li1, Yingzheng Zhang1, Sheng Huang2, Shangjie Chen3, Jiao Shi3, Peiyuan Zhuo1, Hao Jin2, Zuanfang Li4, Weilin Liu5, Zhifu Wang4, Lidian Chen4, Jing Tao6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the precise mechanism of electroacupuncture (EA) to delay cognitive impairment in Alzheimer disease.Entities:
Keywords: Electroacupuncture; Glutamate (Glu); Learning and memory; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS); N-Acetylaspartate (NAA)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29980225 PMCID: PMC6034239 DOI: 10.1186/s40659-018-0166-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Res ISSN: 0716-9760 Impact factor: 5.612
Fig. 4Metabolites measured by using 1H-MRS. a The baseline of the 4 groups by using 1H-MRS spectra. b NAA/Cr, Glu/Cr, mI/Cr of the 4 groups were detected before EA treatment. c NAA/Cr, Glu/Cr, mI/Cr of the 4 groups were detected after EA treatment. d NAA/Cr, Glu/Cr, mI/Cr of the 4 groups were detected after EA treatment for 4 weeks. A: WT group, B: APP/PS1 group, C: APP/PS1+DU20 group; D: APP/PS1+NA group. The square represents the detection area. *P < 0.01 versus WT; #P < 0.05 versus APP/PS1 group; ▲P < 0.05 versus APP/PS1+NA group
Fig. 1The baseline of different groups in Morris water maze task. a Representative swimming paths from different groups. b The average latency to discover the hidden platform. c Platform location crosses. *P < 0.01 versus WT
Fig. 2EA at Baihui (DU20) acupoint improve the learning and memory of APP/PS1 mice in Morris water maze task. a Representative swimming paths of the different groups. b The average latency to discover the hidden platform. c Platform location crosses. #P < 0.05 versus APP/PS1 group; ##P < 0.01 versus APP/PS1 group; ▲P < 0.05 versus APP/PS1+NA group
Fig. 3EA at Baihui (DU20) acupoint improved the damaged learning and memory of APP/PS1 double transgenic mice. a The latency of different groups at the baseline. b The number of errors of different groups at the baseline. c The latency of different groups after EA treatment for 4 weeks. d The errors of different groups after EA treatment for 4 weeks. *P < 0.01 versus WT; ##P < 0.01 versus APP/PS1 group; ▲P < 0.05 versus APP/PS1+NA group
Fig. 5Nissl staining. a Hippocampus of Nissl staining of the 4 groups. The first line represent the whole hippocampus, and other pictures represent CA1 and CA3 areas respectively. b Number of neuronal cells of the whole hippocampus, CA1 and CA3 areas. *P < 0.01 versus WT; ##P < 0.01 versus APP/PS1 group; ▲P < 0.05 versus APP/PS1+NA group
Fig. 6Effects of EA on expression of the BDNF and TrkB of the hippocampus of the APP/PS1 transgenic mice. a The expression of the BDNF of the APP/PS1 transgenic mice of the 4 groups. b The expression of the TrkB of the APP/PS1 transgenic mice of the 4 groups. BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; TrkB, tyrosine kinase receptor B; *P < 0.01 versus WT; ##P < 0.01 versus APP/PS1 group; ▲P < 0.05 versus APP/PS1+NA group