Literature DB >> 29978906

Mechanical behavior of metastatic vertebrae are influenced by tissue architecture, mineral content, and organic feature alterations.

Mikhail Burke1,2, Margarete Akens3,4, Alex Kiss5, Thomas Willett6, Cari Whyne1,2,3.   

Abstract

Diminished vertebral mechanical behavior with metastatic involvement is typically attributed to modified architecture and trabecular bone content. Previous work has identified organic and mineral phase bone quality changes in the presence of metastases, yet limited work exists on the potential influence of such tissue level modifications on vertebral mechanical characteristics. This work seeks to determine correlations between features of bone (structural and tissue level) and mechanical behavior in metastatically involved vertebral bone. It is hypothesized that tissue level properties (mineral and organic) will improve these correlations beyond architectural properties and BMD alone. Twenty-four female athymic rats were inoculated with HeLa or Ace-1 cancer cells lines producing osteolytic (N = 8) or mixed (osteolytic/osteoblastic, N = 7) metastases, respectively. Twenty-one days post-inoculation L1-L3 pathologic vertebral motion segments were excised and μCT imaged. 3D morphometric parameters and axial rigidity of the L2 vertebrae were quantified. Sequential loading and μCT imaging measured progression of failure, stiffness and peak force. Relationships between mechanical testing (whole bone and tissue-level) and tissue-level material property modifications with metastatic involvement were evaluated utilizing linear regression models. Osteolytic involvement reduced vertebral trabecular bone volume, structure, CT-derived axial rigidity, stiffness and failure force compared to healthy controls (N = 9). Mixed metastases demonstrated similar trends. Previously assessed collagen cross-linking and proline-based residues were correlated to mechanical behavior and improved the predictive ability of the regression models. Similarly, collagen organization improved predictive regression models for metastatic bone hardness. This work highlights the importance of both bone content/architecture and organic tissue-level features in characterizing metastatic vertebral mechanics.
© 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:3013-3022, 2018. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone quality; linear regression modeling; mechanical testing; vertebral metastasis; μCT

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29978906     DOI: 10.1002/jor.24105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  9 in total

1.  Temporal and spatial changes in bone mineral content and mechanical properties during breast-cancer bone metastases.

Authors:  Anneke S K Verbruggen; Elan C McCarthy; Roisin M Dwyer; Laoise M McNamara
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2022-06-12

2.  Influence of Metastatic Bone Lesion Type and Tumor Origin on Human Vertebral Bone Architecture, Matrix Quality, and Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Stacyann Bailey; Marc A Stadelmann; Philippe K Zysset; Deepak Vashishth; Ron N Alkalay
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.390

Review 3.  The effects of metastatic lesion on the structural determinants of bone: Current clinical and experimental approaches.

Authors:  Stacyann Bailey; David Hackney; Deepak Vashishth; Ron N Alkalay
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Improved estimates of strength and stiffness in pathologic vertebrae with bone metastases using CT-derived bone density compared with radiographic bone lesion quality classification.

Authors:  Ron N Alkalay; Michael W Groff; Marc A Stadelmann; Florian M Buck; Sven Hoppe; Nicolas Theumann; Umesh Mektar; Roger B Davis; David B Hackney
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2021-09-03

5.  Large Lytic Defects Produce Kinematic Instability and Loss of Compressive Strength in Human Spines: An in Vitro Study.

Authors:  Ron N Alkalay; Robert Adamson; Alexander Miropolsky; Roger B Davis; Mike L Groff; David B Hackney
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.558

6.  Conventional finite element models estimate the strength of metastatic human vertebrae despite alterations of the bone's tissue and structure.

Authors:  Marc A Stadelmann; Denis E Schenk; Ghislain Maquer; Christopher Lenherr; Florian M Buck; Dieter D Bosshardt; Sven Hoppe; Nicolas Theumann; Ron N Alkalay; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.626

7.  Effect of size and location of simulated lytic lesions on the structural properties of human vertebral bodies, a micro-finite element study.

Authors:  M C Costa; L B Bresani Campello; M Ryan; J Rochester; M Viceconti; E Dall'Ara
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2020-03-09

8.  Evaluation of Load-To-Strength Ratios in Metastatic Vertebrae and Comparison With Age- and Sex-Matched Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Dennis E Anderson; Michael W Groff; Thomas F Flood; Brett T Allaire; Roger B Davis; Marc A Stadelmann; Philippe K Zysset; Ron N Alkalay
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-05

Review 9.  Biomechanical Properties of Metastatically Involved Osteolytic Bone.

Authors:  Cari M Whyne; Dallis Ferguson; Allison Clement; Mohammedayaz Rangrez; Michael Hardisty
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.