Literature DB >> 29978657

Q: Can a Court or Patient Demand Treatment? A: Yeah But No.

Joanna Manning1.   

Abstract

The principle from Re J [1993] 3 WLR 507 has stood since 1993: a mentally competent patient cannot demand a specific treatment, nor can a court make an order which would force a doctor to administer a treatment, which, in either case, the responsible doctor considers is contrary to his/her best interests. This column considers the extent to which this principle remains good law 25 years later, concluding that it retains most current relevance in respect of mentally competent patients. In respect of mentally incapacitated patients, however, once a court's jurisdiction has been invoked, the principle appears to be observed in form only, rather than in substance. We have moved a long way from doctors having the ultimate power and responsibility for making treatment decisions to courts becoming heavily involved in making them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Re J principle; best interests; competent patients; demanding treatment; incompetent patients; life prolonging treatment; role of courts

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29978657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med        ISSN: 1320-159X


  1 in total

1.  Do physicians require consent to withhold CPR that they determine to be nonbeneficial?

Authors:  James Downar; Eliana Close; Robert Sibbald
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 8.262

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.