| Literature DB >> 29978612 |
Tae Jin Song1, Il Kwon2, Honglim Piao3, Jee Eun Lee1, Kyeo Rye Han1, Yoonkyung Chang1, Hyung Jung Oh4, Hyun Jung Choi2, Kyung Yul Lee2, Yong Jae Kim1, Ki Hwan Han3, Ji Hoe Heo5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Abnormalities in hemostasis and coagulation have been suggested in chronic renal failure (CRF). In this study, we compared processes of thrombus formation between rats with CRF and those with normal kidney function.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic renal failure; ferric chloride; thromboelastometry; thrombosis
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29978612 PMCID: PMC6037604 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.6.754
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Yonsei Med J ISSN: 0513-5796 Impact factor: 2.759
Fig. 1Method of rotational thromboelastometry. The obtained parameters were time to clot initiation (CT), time to clot formation (CFT), α angle for clot growth kinetics (initial rate of fibrin polymerization), and maximum amplitude representing the viscoelastic strength of clot at 10 min (MA10) and 20 min (MA20). CT, the latency time from adding the start reagent to blood until the clot starts to form; CFT, duration measured from r time to the point where the amplitude of the tracing measures reached 20 mm; α angle, the angle of tangent between 2 and the curve while CFT is the time from CT until a clot firmness of 20 mm point has been reached.
Fig. 2FeCl3-induced thrombus formation in the carotid artery. (A and B) Hematoxylin and eosin staining (×100). Thrombus is indicated with black arrow. CRF, chronic renal failure. (C and D) Gross findings. The maximal diameter of thrombus is larger in CRF than in control mice. Fe-Cl3-induced thrombus formation site is indicated with white arrow.
Comparison of Rotational Thromboelastometry Results between the Control Group and the CRF Group
| Control (n=5) | CRF (n=5) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| EXTEM | |||
| Clotting time (s) | 72.8±5.0 | 59.0±7.3 | 0.032 |
| Clot formation time (s) | 29.0±2.3 | 25.6±0.6 | 0.246 |
| α angle (°) | 82.0±0.6 | 84.8±0.2 | 0.008 |
| MA10 (mm) | 75.8±1.5 | 76.8±0.9 | 0.690 |
| MA20 (mm) | 78.2±1.1 | 80.4±0.6 | 0.222 |
| INTEM | |||
| Clotting time (s) | 81.6±5.9 | 83.6±4.8 | 1.000 |
| Clot formation time (s) | 26.0±0.7 | 24.2±0.5 | 0.151 |
| α angle (°) | 84.0±0.6 | 84.6±0.4 | 0.548 |
| MA10 (mm) | 73.8±0.8 | 75.6±0.8 | 0.310 |
| MA20 (mm) | 77.4±0.8 | 79.2±0.4 | 0.151 |
CRF, chronic renal failure; EXTEM, extrinsic pathway screening thromboelastometry; INTEM, intrinsic pathway screening thromboelastometry; MA10, maximal amplitude at 10 min after the clotting time; MA20, maximal amplitude at 20 min after the clotting time.
Fig. 3Results of rotational thromboelastometry. (A) Extrinsic pathway screening thromboelastometry (EXTEM) for CRF rats. (B) EXTEM for control rats. (C) Intrinsic pathway screening thromboelastometry (INTEM) for CRF rats. (D) INTEM for control rats. In EXTEM, the CRF group (A) showed a shorter time to clotting initiation [clotting time (black arrow), 59.0±7.3 s vs. 72.8±5.0 s, p=0.032] and a higher velocity to clot growth (α angle, 84.8±0.2° vs. 82.0±0.6°, p=0.008) than the control group (B). The clot formation time, MA10, and MA20 were not different between the two groups. However, in INTEM, the clotting time, clot formation time, α angle, MA10, and MA20 were not different between the CRF (C) and control groups (D).