Literature DB >> 29978567

Imaging in gynecological disease (14): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

F Pozzati1, F Moro1, T Pasciuto1, C Gallo2, F Ciccarone1, D Franchi3, R Mancari3, S Giunchi4, D Timmerman5,6, C Landolfo5,6, E Epstein7, V Chiappa8, D Fischerova9, R Fruscio10, G F Zannoni11, L Valentin12, G Scambia1, A C Testa2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ovarian pure clear cell carcinoma.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving data from 11 ultrasound centers. From the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) database, 105 patients who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination by an experienced ultrasound examiner between 1999 and 2016 were identified with a histologically confirmed pure clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. An additional 47 patients diagnosed with pure clear cell carcinoma between 1999 and 2016 and with available complete preoperative ultrasound reports were identified retrospectively from the databases of the departments of gynecological oncology in the participating centers. The ultrasound images of all tumors were described using IOTA terminology. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics were analyzed for the whole group, and separately, for patients with and those without histologically confirmed endometriosis, and for patients with evidence of tumor developing from endometriosis.
RESULTS: Median age of the 152 patients was 53.5 (range, 28-92) years and 92/152 (60.5%) tumors were FIGO Stage I. Most tumors (128/152, 84.2%) were unilateral. On ultrasound examination, all tumors contained solid components and 36/152 (23.7%) were completely solid masses. The median largest diameter of the lesion was 117 (range, 25-310) mm. Papillary projections were present in 58/152 (38.2%) masses and, in most of these (51/56, 91.1%), vascularized papillary projections were seen. Information regarding the presence, site and type of pelvic endometriosis at histology was available for 130/152 patients. Endometriosis was noted in 54 (41.5%) of these. In 24/130 (18.6%) patients, the tumor was judged to have developed from endometriosis. Patients with, compared to those without, evidence of tumor developing from endometriosis were younger (median 47.5 vs 55.0 years, respectively), and ground-glass echogenicity of cyst fluid was more common in pure clear cell cancers developing from endometriosis (10/20 vs 13/79 (50.0% vs 16.5%), respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian pure clear cell carcinoma is usually diagnosed at an early stage and typically appears as a large unilateral mass with solid components. Patients with clear cell carcinoma developing from endometriosis are younger than other patients with clear cell carcinoma, and clear cell cancers developing from endometriosis more often manifest ground-glass echogenicity of cyst fluid.
Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ovarian neoplasm; pure clear cell ovarian carcinoma; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29978567     DOI: 10.1002/uog.19171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current update on malignant epithelial ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Sherif B Elsherif; Priya R Bhosale; Chandana Lall; Christine O Menias; Malak Itani; Kristina A Butler; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-05

Review 2.  Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses and assessment of the extension of ovarian malignancy.

Authors:  Francesca Moro; Rosanna Esposito; Chiara Landolfo; Wouter Froyman; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne; Giovanni Scambia; Lil Valentin; Antonia Carla Testa
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.629

3.  Use of tumor markers to distinguish endometriosis-related ovarian neoplasms from ovarian endometrioma.

Authors:  Hiroki Shinmura; Koichi Yoneyama; Eika Harigane; Yohei Tsunoda; Takehiko Fukami; Takashi Matsushima; Toshiyuki Takeshita
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 4.  ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Dirk Timmerman; François Planchamp; Tom Bourne; Chiara Landolfo; Andreas du Bois; Luis Chiva; David Cibula; Nicole Concin; Daniela Fischerova; Wouter Froyman; Guillermo Gallardo Madueño; Birthe Lemley; Annika Loft; Liliana Mereu; Philippe Morice; Denis Querleu; Antonia Carla Testa; Ignace Vergote; Vincent Vandecaveye; Giovanni Scambia; Christina Fotopoulou
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 5.  Serous borderline ovarian tumours: an extensive review on MR imaging features.

Authors:  Hilal Sahin; Asli Irmak Akdogan; Janette Smith; Jeries Paolo Zawaideh; Helen Addley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.629

6.  Clinical and sonographic features of nipple lesions.

Authors:  Siman Cai; Hongyan Wang; Qingli Zhu; Jianchu Li; Qiang Sun; Yuxin Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.