Literature DB >> 29978368

Predicting Post Neoadjuvant Axillary Response Using a Novel Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm.

Richard Ha1, Peter Chang2, Jenika Karcich3, Simukayi Mutasa3, Eduardo Pascual Van Sant3, Eileen Connolly4, Christine Chin4, Bret Taback5, Michael Z Liu6, Sachin Jambawalikar6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In the postneoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) setting, conventional radiographic complete response (rCR) is a poor predictor of pathologic complete response (pCR) of the axilla. We developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm to better predict post-NAC axillary response using a breast MRI dataset.
METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective study from January 2009 to June 2016 identified 127 breast cancer patients who: (1) underwent breast MRI before the initiation of NAC; (2) successfully completed Adriamycin/Taxane-based NAC; and (3) underwent surgery, including sentinel lymph node evaluation/axillary lymph node dissection with final surgical pathology data. Patients were classified into pathologic complete response (pCR) of the axilla group and non-pCR group based on surgical pathology. Breast MRI performed before NAC was used. Tumor was identified on first T1 postcontrast images underwent 3D segmentation. A total of 2811 volumetric slices of 127 tumors were evaluated. CNN consisted of 10 convolutional layers, 4 max-pooling layers. Dropout, augmentation and L2 regularization were implemented to prevent overfitting of data.
RESULTS: On final surgical pathology, 38.6% (49/127) of the patients achieved pCR of the axilla (group 1), and 61.4% (78/127) of the patients did not with residual metastasis detected (group 2). For predicting axillary pCR, our CNN algorithm achieved an overall accuracy of 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] ± 5) with sensitivity of 93% (95% CI ± 6) and specificity of 77% (95% CI ± 4). Area under the ROC curve (0.93, 95% CI ± 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to use CNN architecture to predict post NAC axillary pCR. Larger data set will likely improve our prediction model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29978368     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6613-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  6 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning in breast MRI.

Authors:  Beatriu Reig; Laura Heacock; Krzysztof J Geras; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  AI-enhanced breast imaging: Where are we and where are we heading?

Authors:  Almir Bitencourt; Isaac Daimiel Naranjo; Roberto Lo Gullo; Carolina Rossi Saccarelli; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.531

3.  Artificial intelligence in breast ultrasonography.

Authors:  Jaeil Kim; Hye Jung Kim; Chanho Kim; Won Hwa Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2020-11-12

Review 4.  Evaluation of cancer outcome assessment using MRI: A review of deep-learning methods.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Sunitha B Thakur; Almir Gv Bitencourt; Roberto Lo Gullo; Andreas M Hötker; David D B Bates; Oguz Akin
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2022-06-22

Review 5.  Deep learning in breast imaging.

Authors:  Arka Bhowmik; Sarah Eskreis-Winkler
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2022-05-13

6.  Lung Nodule Sizes Are Encoded When Scaling CT Image for CNN's.

Authors:  Dmitry Cherezov; Rahul Paul; Nikolai Fetisov; Robert J Gillies; Matthew B Schabath; Dmitry B Goldgof; Lawrence O Hall
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.