Literature DB >> 2997836

Blood flow imaging with MR: spin-phase phenomena.

G K von Schulthess, C B Higgins.   

Abstract

Blood flow phenomena occurring when flow is within the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging plane were analyzed. In this situation, the signal intensity of vascular lumina is predominantly determined by spin-phase change phenomena, and section transition effects of moving spins can be neglected. In this paper, we develop the concepts of in-plane flow, with emphasis on the notion that the spatial variations in velocity and acceleration of blood, which mainly occur along vessel walls, are important determinants of intravascular signal loss in MR images. Flow patterns in the large mediastinal arteries were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed in six healthy subjects and 14 patients with hemodynamic abnormalities using multiple electrocardiograph-gated image acquisition; ungated studies of 30 patients were analyzed for venous flow effects. Intraluminal signal was strongly dependent on the phase of the cardiac cycle and the echo number. Signal loss was found to occur along vessel walls, in vascular bends, and at bifurcations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2997836     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.157.3.2997836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Basic principles of magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  R R Edelman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Abdominal magnetic resonance venography.

Authors:  J P Finn; H E Longmaid
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Dissecting and fusiform aneurysms of vertebro-basilar systems. MR imaging.

Authors:  T Iwama; T Andoh; N Sakai; T Iwata; T Hirata; H Yamada
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  MRI in spontaneous dissection of vertebral and carotid arteries. 15 cases studied at 0.5 tesla.

Authors:  F Gelbert; E Assouline; J E Hodes; D Reizine; F Woimant; B George; M Hagueneau; J J Merland
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Giant aneurysm causing frontal lobe syndrome.

Authors:  C Bokemeyer; B Frank; A Brandis; W Weinrich
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Spontaneous aortic dissection in the presence of coexistent or previously repaired atherosclerotic aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  R P Cambria; D C Brewster; A C Moncure; F L Steinberg; W M Abbott
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Elevated Surfactant Protein Levels and Increased Flow of Cerebrospinal Fluid in Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Stefan Schob; Alexander Weiß; Alexey Surov; Julia Dieckow; Cindy Richter; Mandy Pirlich; Diana Horvath-Rizea; Wolfgang Härtig; Karl-Titus Hoffmann; Matthias Krause; Ulf Quäschling
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 5.590

8.  Flow Patterns in Carotid Webs: A Patient-Based Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.

Authors:  K C J Compagne; K Dilba; E J Postema; A C G M van Es; B J Emmer; C B L M Majoie; W H van Zwam; D W J Dippel; J J Wentzel; A van der Lugt; F J H Gijsen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  MRI assessment of unsuspected dural sinus thrombosis.

Authors:  P J Hulcelle; G C Dooms; P Mathurin; G Cornelis
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Intracranial aneurysms: MR imaging.

Authors:  A Biondi; G Scialfa; G Scotti
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.