Literature DB >> 29978275

Testing for center effects on survival and competing risks outcomes using pseudo-value regression.

Yanzhi Wang1, Brent R Logan2.   

Abstract

In multi-center studies, the presence of a cluster effect leads to correlation among outcomes within a center and requires different techniques to handle such correlation. Testing for a cluster effect can serve as a pre-screening step to help guide the researcher towards the appropriate analysis. With time to event data, score tests have been proposed which test for the presence of a center effect on the hazard function. However, sometimes researchers are interested in directly modeling other quantities such as survival probabilities or cumulative incidence at a fixed time. We propose a test for the presence of a center effect acting directly on the quantity of interest using pseudo-value regression, and derive the asymptotic properties of our proposed test statistic. We examine the performance of our proposed test through simulation studies in both survival and competing risks settings. The proposed test may be more powerful than tests based on the hazard function in settings where the center effect is time-varying. We illustrate the test using a multicenter registry study of survival and competing risks outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clustered time to event data; Cumulative incidence; Generalized linear mixed model; Pseudo-value regression

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29978275      PMCID: PMC6320737          DOI: 10.1007/s10985-018-9443-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  11 in total

1.  Regression modeling of competing risks data based on pseudovalues of the cumulative incidence function.

Authors:  John P Klein; Per Kragh Andersen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Regression analysis of restricted mean survival time based on pseudo-observations.

Authors:  Per Kragh Andersen; Mette Gerster Hansen; John P Klein
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time.

Authors:  John P Klein; Brent Logan; Mette Harhoff; Per Kragh Andersen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  On pseudo-values for regression analysis in competing risks models.

Authors:  Frederik Graw; Thomas A Gerds; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Score test of homogeneity for survival data.

Authors:  D Commenges; P K Andersen
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 6.  Comparison of stopped Cox regression with direct methods such as pseudo-values and binomial regression.

Authors:  Hans C van Houwelingen; Hein Putter
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Estimating and testing for center effects in competing risks.

Authors:  Sandrine Katsahian; Christian Boudreau
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  The Kaplan-Meier Estimator as an Inverse-Probability-of-Censoring Weighted Average.

Authors:  Glen A Satten; Somnath Datta
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 8.710

9.  Marginal models for clustered time-to-event data with competing risks using pseudovalues.

Authors:  Brent R Logan; Mei-Jie Zhang; John P Klein
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Dynamic predicting by landmarking as an alternative for multi-state modeling: an application to acute lymphoid leukemia data.

Authors:  Hans C van Houwelingen; Hein Putter
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 1.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.