Karen A Autio1,2, Robert Dreicer3, Justine Anderson1, Jorge A Garcia4, Ajjai Alva5, Lowell L Hart6, Matthew I Milowsky7, Edwin M Posadas8, Charles J Ryan9, Ryon P Graf10, Ryan Dittamore10, Nicole A Schreiber1, Jason M Summa11, Hagop Youssoufian11, Michael J Morris1,2, Howard I Scher1,2. 1. Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 2. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. 3. Department of Medicine and Urology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville. 4. Department of Solid Tumor Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 5. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor. 6. Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers. 7. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 8. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 9. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco. 10. Epic Sciences, Inc, San Diego, California. 11. Bind Therapeutics, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Preferential delivery of docetaxel to tumors by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted nanoparticles is clinically effective, and the selective reduction of PSMA-positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) after treatment has implications for patient selection and disease monitoring. Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of BIND-014, a PSMA-directed docetaxel-containing nanoparticle, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter open-label, phase 2 clinical trial of 42 chemotherapy-naive patients with progressing mCRPC after treatment with abiraterone acetate and/or enzalutamide was conducted from June 24, 2013, to June 10, 2016. Intervention: Treatment with BIND-014 at a dosage of 60 mg/m2 was given intravenously on day 1 of 21-day cycles in combination with prednisone until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was radiographic progression-free survival according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 recommendations and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary end points included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥50% reduction from baseline) and changes in CTC number (from ≥5 to <5 cells per 7.5 mL of blood) (CellSearch). Changes in CTC number based on PSMA expression levels on CTCs were also evaluated (Epic Sciences). Results: Among the 42 patients (81% white), the median age was 66 (range, 50-85) years, and median number of doses received was 6 (range, 1-21). A PSA response was observed in 12 of 40 patients (30%; 95% CI, 18%-45%), measurable disease response in 6 of 19 (32% [95% CI, 15%-54%]), and CTC conversions in 13 of 26 (50%; 95% CI, 32%-68%). Median radiographic progression-free survival was 9.9 (95% CI, 7.1-12.6) months. With use of the Epic Sciences non-EPCAM-based CTC detection platform, CTCs were detected in 16 of 18 patients (89%); 11 of 18 (61%) had CTCs with PSMA expression above the analytical threshold level (PSMA positive) at baseline (range, 0.4-72.4 CTCs/mL). After treatment, PSMA-positive CTCs were preferentially reduced. Treatment-related adverse events included grade 1 or 2 fatigue (29 of 42 patients [69%]), nausea (23 [55%]), neuropathy (14 [33%]), and neutropenic fever (1 [2%]). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that treatment with BIND-014 is active and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC. Antitumor activity may be related to PSMA expression levels on CTCs, which suggests that patients who are likely to benefit from this treatment can be identified before treatment is initiated. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01812746.
Importance: Preferential delivery of docetaxel to tumors by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted nanoparticles is clinically effective, and the selective reduction of PSMA-positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) after treatment has implications for patient selection and disease monitoring. Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of BIND-014, a PSMA-directed docetaxel-containing nanoparticle, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter open-label, phase 2 clinical trial of 42 chemotherapy-naive patients with progressing mCRPC after treatment with abiraterone acetate and/or enzalutamide was conducted from June 24, 2013, to June 10, 2016. Intervention: Treatment with BIND-014 at a dosage of 60 mg/m2 was given intravenously on day 1 of 21-day cycles in combination with prednisone until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was radiographic progression-free survival according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 recommendations and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary end points included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥50% reduction from baseline) and changes in CTC number (from ≥5 to <5 cells per 7.5 mL of blood) (CellSearch). Changes in CTC number based on PSMA expression levels on CTCs were also evaluated (Epic Sciences). Results: Among the 42 patients (81% white), the median age was 66 (range, 50-85) years, and median number of doses received was 6 (range, 1-21). A PSA response was observed in 12 of 40 patients (30%; 95% CI, 18%-45%), measurable disease response in 6 of 19 (32% [95% CI, 15%-54%]), and CTC conversions in 13 of 26 (50%; 95% CI, 32%-68%). Median radiographic progression-free survival was 9.9 (95% CI, 7.1-12.6) months. With use of the Epic Sciences non-EPCAM-based CTC detection platform, CTCs were detected in 16 of 18 patients (89%); 11 of 18 (61%) had CTCs with PSMA expression above the analytical threshold level (PSMA positive) at baseline (range, 0.4-72.4 CTCs/mL). After treatment, PSMA-positive CTCs were preferentially reduced. Treatment-related adverse events included grade 1 or 2 fatigue (29 of 42 patients [69%]), nausea (23 [55%]), neuropathy (14 [33%]), and neutropenic fever (1 [2%]). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that treatment with BIND-014 is active and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC. Antitumor activity may be related to PSMA expression levels on CTCs, which suggests that patients who are likely to benefit from this treatment can be identified before treatment is initiated. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01812746.
Authors: Sebastian Mannweiler; Peter Amersdorfer; Slave Trajanoski; Jonathan A Terrett; David King; Gabor Mehes Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2008-09-18 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Shankar Vallabhajosula; Anastasia Nikolopoulou; John W Babich; Joseph R Osborne; Scott T Tagawa; Irina Lipai; Lilja Solnes; Kevin P Maresca; Thomas Armor; John L Joyal; Robert Crummet; James B Stubbs; Stanley J Goldsmith Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jeffrey S Weber; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Marc S Ernstoff; Oscar B Goodman; Lee D Cranmer; John L Marshall; Sabrina Miles; Dar Rosario; David C Diamond; Zhiyong Qiu; Mihail Obrocea; Adrian Bot Journal: J Immunother Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.456
Authors: Jeffrey Hrkach; Daniel Von Hoff; Mir Mukkaram Ali; Elizaveta Andrianova; Jason Auer; Tarikh Campbell; David De Witt; Michael Figa; Maria Figueiredo; Allen Horhota; Susan Low; Kevin McDonnell; Erick Peeke; Beadle Retnarajan; Abhimanyu Sabnis; Edward Schnipper; Jeffrey J Song; Young Ho Song; Jason Summa; Douglas Tompsett; Greg Troiano; Tina Van Geen Hoven; Jim Wright; Patricia LoRusso; Philip W Kantoff; Neil H Bander; Christopher Sweeney; Omid C Farokhzad; Robert Langer; Stephen Zale Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2012-04-04 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel D Von Hoff; Monica M Mita; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Glen J Weiss; Alain C Mita; Patricia M LoRusso; Howard A Burris; Lowell L Hart; Susan C Low; Donald M Parsons; Stephen E Zale; Jason M Summa; Hagop Youssoufian; Jasgit C Sachdev Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Johann S de Bono; Howard I Scher; R Bruce Montgomery; Christopher Parker; M Craig Miller; Henk Tissing; Gerald V Doyle; Leon W W M Terstappen; Kenneth J Pienta; Derek Raghavan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Angel E Dago; Asya Stepansky; Anders Carlsson; Madelyn Luttgen; Jude Kendall; Timour Baslan; Anand Kolatkar; Michael Wigler; Kelly Bethel; Mitchell E Gross; James Hicks; Peter Kuhn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Frederik Soetaert; Preethi Korangath; David Serantes; Steven Fiering; Robert Ivkov Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2020-06-27 Impact factor: 15.470
Authors: Channing J Paller; Danilo Piana; James R Eshleman; Stacy Riel; Samuel R Denmeade; Pedro Isaacsson Velho; Steven P Rowe; Martin G Pomper; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Jun Luo; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: Prostate Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Lorenz C Hofbauer; Aline Bozec; Martina Rauner; Franz Jakob; Sven Perner; Klaus Pantel Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Roy van der Meel; Einar Sulheim; Yang Shi; Fabian Kiessling; Willem J M Mulder; Twan Lammers Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Paolo Decuzzi; Dan Peer; Daniele Di Mascolo; Anna Lisa Palange; Purnima Naresh Manghnani; S Moein Moghimi; Z Shadi Farhangrazi; Kenneth A Howard; Daniel Rosenblum; Tingxizi Liang; Zhaowei Chen; Zejun Wang; Jun-Jie Zhu; Zhen Gu; Netanel Korin; Didier Letourneur; Cédric Chauvierre; Roy van der Meel; Fabian Kiessling; Twan Lammers Journal: Nanotechnology Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 3.874