Literature DB >> 29977376

Imide arylation with aryl(TMP)iodonium tosylates.

Souradeep Basu1, Alexander H Sandtorv1, David R Stuart1.   

Abstract

Herein, we describe the synthesis of N-aryl phthalimides by n class="Chemical">metal-free coupling of potassium phthalimide with unsymmetrical aryl(TMP)iodonium tosylate salts. The aryl transfer from the iodonium moiety occurs under electronic control with the electron-rich trimethoxyphenyl group acting as a competent dummy ligand. The yields of N-aryl phthalimides are moderate to high and the coupling reaction is compatible with electron-deficient and sterically encumbered aryl groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C–N coupling; arylation; diaryliodonium; hypercoordinate iodine; metal-free

Year:  2018        PMID: 29977376      PMCID: PMC6009222          DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.14.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem        ISSN: 1860-5397            Impact factor:   2.883


Introduction

Imides are important structural units in a range of approved pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals (Scheme 1a) [1]. Despite the general prevalence of imides, N-aryl imide derivatives are relatively rare in such compounds. We were surprised by this disparity, but found that a lack of methods to synthesize n class="Chemical">N-aryl imides may explain their scarcity; this is particularly true relative to other N-aryl compounds. The survey of methods revealed that the dominant approach to N-aryl imides is to employ aniline starting materials (Scheme 1b, left), as was done in the synthesis of pentoxazone and related herbicides [2]. The alternative aromatic substitution approach with imide anions (Scheme 1b, right) is hampered by their low nucleophilicity [3]. Therefore, transition metals feature prominently in such methods, but even recent examples employ stoichiometric metal mediators [4]. Metal-free methods by classic SNAr are also attractive, but only possible on very electron-deficient arene substrates [5]. Diaryliodonium salts are useful reagents for metal-free aryl transfer [6-10] and Muñiz and co-workers have recently reported an elegant study on sterically controlled C–N coupling of 2,6-disubstituted aryl(phenyl)iodonium salts and imides [11]. We have been investigating the generality of electronically controlled aryl transfer from aryl(trimethoxyphenyl)iodonium salts [12-14] and describe here the development of a C–N coupling of a phthalimide anion with non-sterically biased aryl groups. The protocol is compatible with ortho-, meta-, and para-substitution on the aryl group and the phthalimide moiety may also provide access to anilines.
Scheme 1

Imides as an important scaffold.

Imides as an important scaffold.

Results and Discussion

We initiated our optimization of the arylation of the potassium phthalimide nucleophile with n class="Chemical">diaryliodonium electrophiles by surveying several reaction conditions: dummy ligand (Aux), counter anion, solvent and volume, reaction temperature, and stoichiometry (Table 1). Consistent with an electronically controlled aryl transfer, the trimethoxyphenyl (TMP) auxiliary was superior to mesityl (Mes), phenyl (Ph), and anisyl (An) auxiliaries under several different reaction conditions (Table 1, entries 1–3; 11 and 12; 16 and 17). While the counter anion did not exert a dramatic influence on the reaction yield, using tosylate (OTs) produced the highest yield in both DCE and toluene as solvent (Table 1, entries 4–8). Given our ability to readily access aryl(TMP)iodonium tosylate salts [12] we continued our optimization with these reagents. We observed a very narrow operating temperature with a maximum yield at 100 °C when toluene was used as solvent (Table 1, entries 9, 10, and 12). We also observed that the reaction yield decreases with dilution (Table 1, entries 13–15). Finally, the yield increases with increasing stoichiometry of phthalimide (Table 1, entries 10, 13, and 17). It is also important to note that under “optimal” conditions (Table 1, entry 17) we did not observe a Phth–TMP adduct. Moreover, we did observe essentially quantitative formation of TMP–I and therefore complete consumption of 1a and high fidelity for aryl transfer selectivity. At this time we are unable to account for the remaining mass balance (≈25%) of the methyl benzoate moiety of 1a. We have employed the conditions of entry 17 (Table 1) as our standard conditions to evaluate the scope of this reaction.
Table 1

Discovery and optimization of reaction conditions.a


EntryX groupAux groupPhth. equivSolventTemp. (°C)1H NMR yield

1TFAMes2DCE (1 mL)7027%
2TFAPh2DCE (1 mL)7050%
3TFATMP2DCE (1 mL)7052%
4TFATMP3DCE (1 mL)8054%
5OTsTMP3DCE (1 mL)8062%
6TFATMP3toluene (0.42 mL)10050%
7OTfTMP3toluene (0.42 mL)10056%
8OTsTMP3toluene (0.42 mL)10068%
9OTsTMP3toluene (0.5 mL)9064%
10OTsTMP3toluene (0.5 mL)10070%
11OTsPh3toluene (0.5 mL)10023%
12OTsTMP3toluene (0.5 mL)11062%
13OTsTMP1.1toluene (0.5 mL)10039%
14OTsTMP1.1toluene (1 mL)10028%
15OTsTMP1.1toluene (1.5 mL)10016%
16OTsAn5toluene (0.5 mL)10046%
17OTsTMP5toluene (0.5 mL)10075%

aConditions: 1 (0.1 mmol, 1 equiv), potassium phthalimide (see table for equivalents), solvent (see table), temperature (see table), 24 hours.

Discovery and optimization of reaction conditions.a aConditions: 1 (0.1 mmol, 1 equiv), potassium phthalimide (see table for equivalents), solvent (see table), temperature (see table), 24 hours. We have assessed the scope of compatible aryl groups under our optimal conditions (Scheme 2). Under electronic control, strong electron-withdrawing groups on the aryl ring lead to high yield of N-aryl phthalimide products (Scheme 2, 2a–d, 66–90% yield). However, the n class="Chemical">TMP auxiliary also enables the coupling of phthalimide with moderately electron-deficient aryl groups. For instance the p-chlorophenyl moiety (2e) is coupled to phthalimide in moderate yield (42%). Additionally, we have observed that electronic and steric effects operate in concert to couple an o-tolyl (2f) moiety to phthalimide in high yield (67%). In this case, 2,6-disubstituted aryl groups are not required for a sterically controlled coupling. Finally, as an example two polysubstituted aryl groups are introduced in this coupling reaction, which are specifically enabled by the use of an unsymmetrical aryl(TMP)iodonium electrophile (Scheme 2, 2g and 2h, 42 and 99% yield, respectively).
Scheme 2

Scope of compatible aryl groups. Conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol, 1 equiv), potassium phthalimide (2.5 mmol, 5 equiv), toluene (2.5 mL), 100 °C, 24 hours. Isolated yields are reported.

Scope of compatible aryl groups. Conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol, 1 equiv), potassium phthalimide (2.5 mmol, 5 equiv), n class="Chemical">toluene (2.5 mL), 100 °C, 24 hours. Isolated yields are reported. The phthalimide moiety is well-recognized as an “NH3” surrogate, and the products depicted in Scheme 2 may be deprotected to yield n class="Chemical">aniline derivatives. In a specific example, 1a is reacted under modified conditions to yield 2a. In this one-pot procedure, hydrazine in aqueous ethanol is added directly to the reaction mixture and aniline 3 is isolated in 63% yield from 1a (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3

One-pot synthesis of anilines.

One-pot synthesis of anilines. We have previously described the coupling of aryl(TMP)iodonium tosylates with n class="Chemical">azide nucleophiles [14]. Azide is a notably stronger nucleophile than phthalimide and it is interesting to compare the reaction of these two nucleophiles with 1a under similar conditions (Table 2). The Mayr nucleophilicity constant of azide [15] is 20.5 and high yield (95%) is observed in a reaction with 1a under relatively mild temperature (65 °C) and short reaction time (2 hours, Table 2, entry 1). The Mayr nucleophilicity constant for phthalimide is five-orders of magnitude lower (15.5) [3] and under similar conditions leads to trace product (Table 2, entry 2). In order to obtain a high yield of 2a, albeit lower than given in entry 1, a higher temperature (100 °C) and a longer reaction time (24 hours) are required (Table 2, entry 3). This suggests that the contribution of nucleophilicity (via Mayr nucleophilicity constants) [16] may be useful in developing other coupling reactions with diaryliodonium electrophiles.
Table 2

Comparison of nucleophilicity.


EntryNucleophile (Nu)Mayr nucleophilicityTemperature (°C)TimeYield

1azide20.5652 hours95%
2phthalimide15.5652 hourstrace
3phthalimide15.510024 hours80%
Comparison of nucleophilicity.

Conclusion

The coupling of both electron-deficient and sterically encumbered aryl groups with a phthalimide anion is achievable with n class="Chemical">aryl(TMP)iodonium tosylate salts. This is an electronically controlled coupling reaction that is enabled by the TMP auxiliary and complementary to the sterically controlled coupling previously reported. We anticipate that this reaction will find use as a starting point for the synthesis of N-aryl imides in a range of applications. General experimental details, procedures, tabulated spectroscopic data, and 1H, 13C{1H}, and 19F NMR spectra of compounds 1g, 2a–i, and 3.
  11 in total

1.  Philicities, Fugalities, and Equilibrium Constants.

Authors:  Herbert Mayr; Armin R Ofial
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 22.384

2.  Nucleophilic reactivities of imide and amide anions.

Authors:  Martin Breugst; Takahiro Tokuyasu; Herbert Mayr
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 4.354

3.  An Admix Approach To Determine Counter Anion Effects on Metal-Free Arylation Reactions with Diaryliodonium Salts.

Authors:  Thomas L Seidl; David R Stuart
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.354

4.  Metal-free Synthesis of Aryl Amines: Beyond Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution.

Authors:  Alexander H Sandtorv; David R Stuart
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 5.  Aryl Transfer Selectivity in Metal-Free Reactions of Unsymmetrical Diaryliodonium Salts.

Authors:  David R Stuart
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.236

6.  Diaryliodonium salts: a journey from obscurity to fame.

Authors:  Eleanor A Merritt; Berit Olofsson
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Unsymmetrical Aryl(2,4,6-trimethoxyphenyl)iodonium Salts: One-Pot Synthesis, Scope, Stability, and Synthetic Studies.

Authors:  Thomas L Seidl; Sunil K Sundalam; Brennen McCullough; David R Stuart
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.354

8.  Reactions of hypervalent iodine reagents with palladium: mechanisms and applications in organic synthesis.

Authors:  Nicholas R Deprez; Melanie S Sanford
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 5.165

9.  DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018.

Authors:  David S Wishart; Yannick D Feunang; An C Guo; Elvis J Lo; Ana Marcu; Jason R Grant; Tanvir Sajed; Daniel Johnson; Carin Li; Zinat Sayeeda; Nazanin Assempour; Ithayavani Iynkkaran; Yifeng Liu; Adam Maciejewski; Nicola Gale; Alex Wilson; Lucy Chin; Ryan Cummings; Diana Le; Allison Pon; Craig Knox; Michael Wilson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Sterically Congested 2,6-Disubstituted Anilines from Direct C-N Bond Formation at an Iodine(III) Center.

Authors:  Nicola Lucchetti; Michelangelo Scalone; Serena Fantasia; Kilian Muñiz
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 15.336

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cu-catalyzed N-3-Arylation of Hydantoins Using Diaryliodonium Salts.

Authors:  Linn Neerbye Berntsen; Ainara Nova; David S Wragg; Alexander H Sandtorv
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.005

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.